Multi-way Analysis of the Gender Dimension of the Sustainable Development Goals

IF 2.8 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Social Indicators Research Pub Date : 2024-02-27 DOI:10.1007/s11205-023-03273-9
Edith Johana Medina-Hernández, María José Fernández-Gómez
{"title":"Multi-way Analysis of the Gender Dimension of the Sustainable Development Goals","authors":"Edith Johana Medina-Hernández, María José Fernández-Gómez","doi":"10.1007/s11205-023-03273-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The gender dimension of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) is integral to the goals established to foster the development of nations, as it is intertwined with other goals and enhances their attainability. Thus, this study examines 28 indicators belonging to the goals of the sustainable development objectives, distinguishing between the gender SDGs (6 indicators) and other SDGs (22 indicators), all of which were reported by 110 countries in the year 2023. The assessment considers four regions: the African continent (28 countries), the Americas region (21 countries), Asia-Oceania (29 countries), and Europe (32 countries). The STATICO multivariate technique is used (consisting of four Co-inertia analyses and one Partial Triadic Analysis) to study the interactions among the indicators. The goal is to determine whether differences or similarities exist between these indicators within each region and to make a comparative assessment across countries. The study’s findings show the existing covariances between the various targets of the 2030 Agenda and indicate that in Europe, the gender dimension is more closely integrated with the other SDGs than in the other regions. In Africa, substantial variations between countries are observed, while Asia, Oceania, and the Americas face challenges in specific indicators and countries in terms of achieving sustainable development.</p>","PeriodicalId":21943,"journal":{"name":"Social Indicators Research","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Indicators Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-023-03273-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The gender dimension of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) is integral to the goals established to foster the development of nations, as it is intertwined with other goals and enhances their attainability. Thus, this study examines 28 indicators belonging to the goals of the sustainable development objectives, distinguishing between the gender SDGs (6 indicators) and other SDGs (22 indicators), all of which were reported by 110 countries in the year 2023. The assessment considers four regions: the African continent (28 countries), the Americas region (21 countries), Asia-Oceania (29 countries), and Europe (32 countries). The STATICO multivariate technique is used (consisting of four Co-inertia analyses and one Partial Triadic Analysis) to study the interactions among the indicators. The goal is to determine whether differences or similarities exist between these indicators within each region and to make a comparative assessment across countries. The study’s findings show the existing covariances between the various targets of the 2030 Agenda and indicate that in Europe, the gender dimension is more closely integrated with the other SDGs than in the other regions. In Africa, substantial variations between countries are observed, while Asia, Oceania, and the Americas face challenges in specific indicators and countries in terms of achieving sustainable development.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对可持续发展目标性别层面的多向分析
可持续发展目标(SDG)的性别维度是为促进国家发展而制定的目标的组成部分,因为它与其他目标相互交织,增强了这些目标的可实现性。因此,本研究审查了属于可持续发展目标的 28 项指标,区分了性别可持续发展目标(6 项指标)和其他可持续发展目标(22 项指标),所有这些指标均由 110 个国家在 2023 年进行报告。评估考虑了四个地区:非洲大陆(28 个国家)、美洲地区(21 个国家)、亚洲-大洋洲(29 个国家)和欧洲(32 个国家)。采用 STATICO 多变量技术(包括四个共惯性分析和一个部分三元分析)来研究指标之间的相互影响。目的是确定每个地区内这些指标之间是否存在差异或相似之处,并对各国进行比较评估。研究结果显示了 2030 年议程各项目标之间存在的共变关系,并表明在欧洲,性别维度与其他可持续发展目标的结合比其他地区更为紧密。在非洲,各国之间存在很大差异,而亚洲、大洋洲和美洲在实现可持续发展方面面临着特定指标和国家的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.50%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: Since its foundation in 1974, Social Indicators Research has become the leading journal on problems related to the measurement of all aspects of the quality of life. The journal continues to publish results of research on all aspects of the quality of life and includes studies that reflect developments in the field. It devotes special attention to studies on such topics as sustainability of quality of life, sustainable development, and the relationship between quality of life and sustainability. The topics represented in the journal cover and involve a variety of segmentations, such as social groups, spatial and temporal coordinates, population composition, and life domains. The journal presents empirical, philosophical and methodological studies that cover the entire spectrum of society and are devoted to giving evidences through indicators. It considers indicators in their different typologies, and gives special attention to indicators that are able to meet the need of understanding social realities and phenomena that are increasingly more complex, interrelated, interacted and dynamical. In addition, it presents studies aimed at defining new approaches in constructing indicators.
期刊最新文献
How to Assess Livelihoods? Critical Reflections on the Use of Common Indicators to Capture Socioeconomic Outcomes for Ecological Restoration workers in South Africa Quantifying Turbulence: Introducing a Multi-crises Impact Index for Lebanon A Machine Learning Approach to Well-Being in Late Childhood and Early Adolescence: The Children’s Worlds Data Case Where You Sit Is Where You Stand: Perceived (In)Equality and Demand for Democracy in Africa An Evaluation of the Impact of the Pension System on Income Inequality: USA, UK, Netherlands, Italy and Türkiye
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1