The FDA's Proposed Rule on Laboratory-Developed Tests: Impacts on Clinical Laboratories and Patient Care

Leslie Smith, Lisa A Carricaburu, Jonathan R Genzen
{"title":"The FDA's Proposed Rule on Laboratory-Developed Tests: Impacts on Clinical Laboratories and Patient Care","authors":"Leslie Smith, Lisa A Carricaburu, Jonathan R Genzen","doi":"10.1101/2024.02.28.24303459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In October 2023, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a proposed rule to regulate laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) as medical devices. While approximately 6,700 public comments were submitted during the open comment period, there is not a reliable mechanism to quantify how clinical laboratorians as a sector perceive the proposed rule. To solicit quantifiable feedback on the FDA's proposed rule, a ten-item questionnaire was developed and submitted to clinical laboratory customers of ARUP Laboratories, a national nonprofit clinical laboratory of the University of Utah Department of Pathology. Of 503 clinical laboratory respondents, only 41 (8.2%) support the FDA's proposed rule. 66.9% of respondents work in laboratories that perform LDTs and were therefore asked additional questions regarding the proposed rule. 83.9% of these respondents believe that the proposed rule will negatively impact their laboratories, while only 3.0% believe that they have the financial resources to pay for FDA user fees. 60.9% of respondents anticipate removing tests from their laboratory menus if the proposed rule is enacted, while an additional 33.2% indicated that they do not yet know. Only 11.2% of respondents believe that they would pursue FDA submissions for all of their existing LDTs if the final rule is enacted. The vast majority of respondents (>80%) were either 'extremely concerned' or 'very concerned' about the impact of the proposed rule on patient access to essential testing, financial and personnel resources to comply, innovation, the FDA's ability to implement the proposed rule, and send-out costs and test prices. Respondents indicated that they would rely heavily on reference laboratory partners for advocacy against the proposed rule, testing options, education, and consultation if the rule was enacted. Thematic analysis of open comments revealed strong opposition to the proposed rule and significant concern regarding negative impacts to patient care across clinical laboratory settings.","PeriodicalId":501386,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.28.24303459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In October 2023, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a proposed rule to regulate laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) as medical devices. While approximately 6,700 public comments were submitted during the open comment period, there is not a reliable mechanism to quantify how clinical laboratorians as a sector perceive the proposed rule. To solicit quantifiable feedback on the FDA's proposed rule, a ten-item questionnaire was developed and submitted to clinical laboratory customers of ARUP Laboratories, a national nonprofit clinical laboratory of the University of Utah Department of Pathology. Of 503 clinical laboratory respondents, only 41 (8.2%) support the FDA's proposed rule. 66.9% of respondents work in laboratories that perform LDTs and were therefore asked additional questions regarding the proposed rule. 83.9% of these respondents believe that the proposed rule will negatively impact their laboratories, while only 3.0% believe that they have the financial resources to pay for FDA user fees. 60.9% of respondents anticipate removing tests from their laboratory menus if the proposed rule is enacted, while an additional 33.2% indicated that they do not yet know. Only 11.2% of respondents believe that they would pursue FDA submissions for all of their existing LDTs if the final rule is enacted. The vast majority of respondents (>80%) were either 'extremely concerned' or 'very concerned' about the impact of the proposed rule on patient access to essential testing, financial and personnel resources to comply, innovation, the FDA's ability to implement the proposed rule, and send-out costs and test prices. Respondents indicated that they would rely heavily on reference laboratory partners for advocacy against the proposed rule, testing options, education, and consultation if the rule was enacted. Thematic analysis of open comments revealed strong opposition to the proposed rule and significant concern regarding negative impacts to patient care across clinical laboratory settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)关于实验室开发检验的拟议规则:对临床实验室和患者护理的影响
2023 年 10 月,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)发布了一项将实验室开发的检验项目(LDT)作为医疗器械进行监管的拟议规则。虽然在公开征求意见期间,公众提交了约 6700 条意见,但并没有一个可靠的机制来量化临床实验室作为一个部门对该拟议规则的看法。为了征求对 FDA 拟议规则的量化反馈意见,我们编制了一份包含十个项目的调查问卷,并提交给 ARUP 实验室(犹他大学病理学系的一家全国性非营利临床实验室)的临床实验室客户。在 503 个临床实验室受访者中,只有 41 个(8.2%)支持食品药物管理局的拟议规则。66.9% 的受访者所在的实验室从事 LDT 工作,因此他们被问到了有关拟议规则的其他问题。其中 83.9% 的受访者认为拟议的规则会对他们的实验室产生负面影响,而只有 3.0% 的受访者认为他们有财力支付 FDA 的使用费。60.9% 的受访者预计,如果拟议规则颁布,他们将从实验室菜单中删除检测项目,另有 33.2% 的受访者表示尚不清楚。只有 11.2% 的受访者认为,如果最终规则颁布,他们会为现有的所有 LDT 向 FDA 递交申请。绝大多数受访者(80%)"极为关注 "或 "非常关注 "拟议规则对患者获得基本检测、遵守规则所需的财力和人力资源、创新、FDA 执行拟议规则的能力以及发送成本和检测价格的影响。受访者表示,如果该规则颁布实施,他们将在很大程度上依赖参考实验室合作伙伴对拟议规则的宣传、检测选择、教育和咨询。对公开意见的专题分析表明,受访者强烈反对该拟议规则,并对该规则对临床实验室的患者护理产生的负面影响表示严重关切。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"WE CAN ALL CONTRIBUTE IN OUR OWN WAY" : KNOWLEDGE MOBILIZATION TOOLS TO PROMOTE BEST PRACTICES IN UNIVERSAL ACCESSIBILITY Geospatial Analysis of the Association between Medicaid Ex-pansion, Minimum Wage Policies, and Alzheimer's Disease Dementia Prevalence in the United States The clinical and cost-effectiveness of interventions for preventing continence issues resulting from birth trauma: a rapid review Supporting women, girls and people who menstruate to participate in physical activity - Rapid evidence summary Performance of the Washington Group Questions in Measuring Blindness and Deafness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1