Early radiological outcomes of a fully porous bridging collar in lower-limb endoprosthetic reconstructions: a case-matched retrospective series to assess osseointegration.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Arthroplasty Pub Date : 2024-03-02 DOI:10.1186/s42836-023-00230-2
Jonathan Stevenson, M Ather Siddiqi, Vicky Sheehy, Ben Kendrick, Duncan Whitwell, Adrian Taylor, Gordon Blunn, Hasan R Mohammad, Atul F Kamath, Sofia Thoma
{"title":"Early radiological outcomes of a fully porous bridging collar in lower-limb endoprosthetic reconstructions: a case-matched retrospective series to assess osseointegration.","authors":"Jonathan Stevenson, M Ather Siddiqi, Vicky Sheehy, Ben Kendrick, Duncan Whitwell, Adrian Taylor, Gordon Blunn, Hasan R Mohammad, Atul F Kamath, Sofia Thoma","doi":"10.1186/s42836-023-00230-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limb-salvage surgery involving the utilization of endoprosthetic replacements is commonly employed following segmental bone resection for primary and secondary bone tumors. This study aimed to evaluate whether a fully porous bridging collar promotes early osseous integration in endoprosthetic replacements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We undertook a retrospective review of all lower-limb endoprostheses utilizing a fully porous endosteal bridging collar design. We matched this cohort with a conventional extra-osteal non-porous fully hydroxyapatite-coated grooved collar cohort according to surgical indication, implant type, resection length, age, and follow-up time. At 6, 12, and 24 months post-implantation, radiographs were assessed for the number of cortices with or without osseointegration on orthogonal radiographs. Each radiograph was scored on a scale of -4 to + 4 for the number of cortices bridging the ongrowth between the bone and the collar of the prosthesis. Implant survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the mean number of osseointegrated cortices at each time point between the collar designs was compared using a paired t-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety patients were retrospectively identified and analyzed. After exclusion, 40 patients with porous bridging collars matched with 40 patients with conventional extra-osteal non-porous collars were included in the study (n = 80). The mean age was 63.4 years (range 16-91 years); there were 37 males and 43 females. The groups showed no difference in implant survival (P = 0.54). The mean number of cortices with radiographic ongrowth for the porous bridging collar and non-porous collar groups was 2.1 and 0.3, respectively, at 6-month (P < 0.0001), 2.4 and 0.5, respectively, at 12-month (P = 0.044), and 3.2 and -0.2, respectively, at 24-month (P = 0.18) radiological follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings indicate that fully porous bridging collars increased the number of cortices, with evidence of bone ongrowth between 6 and 24 months post-implantation. By contrast, extra-osteal collars exhibited reduced evidence of ongrowth between 6 and 24 months post-implantation. In the medium term, the use of a fully porous bridging collar may translate to a reduced incidence of aseptic loosening.</p>","PeriodicalId":52831,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty","volume":"6 1","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10908216/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-023-00230-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Limb-salvage surgery involving the utilization of endoprosthetic replacements is commonly employed following segmental bone resection for primary and secondary bone tumors. This study aimed to evaluate whether a fully porous bridging collar promotes early osseous integration in endoprosthetic replacements.

Methods: We undertook a retrospective review of all lower-limb endoprostheses utilizing a fully porous endosteal bridging collar design. We matched this cohort with a conventional extra-osteal non-porous fully hydroxyapatite-coated grooved collar cohort according to surgical indication, implant type, resection length, age, and follow-up time. At 6, 12, and 24 months post-implantation, radiographs were assessed for the number of cortices with or without osseointegration on orthogonal radiographs. Each radiograph was scored on a scale of -4 to + 4 for the number of cortices bridging the ongrowth between the bone and the collar of the prosthesis. Implant survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the mean number of osseointegrated cortices at each time point between the collar designs was compared using a paired t-test.

Results: Ninety patients were retrospectively identified and analyzed. After exclusion, 40 patients with porous bridging collars matched with 40 patients with conventional extra-osteal non-porous collars were included in the study (n = 80). The mean age was 63.4 years (range 16-91 years); there were 37 males and 43 females. The groups showed no difference in implant survival (P = 0.54). The mean number of cortices with radiographic ongrowth for the porous bridging collar and non-porous collar groups was 2.1 and 0.3, respectively, at 6-month (P < 0.0001), 2.4 and 0.5, respectively, at 12-month (P = 0.044), and 3.2 and -0.2, respectively, at 24-month (P = 0.18) radiological follow-up.

Conclusion: These findings indicate that fully porous bridging collars increased the number of cortices, with evidence of bone ongrowth between 6 and 24 months post-implantation. By contrast, extra-osteal collars exhibited reduced evidence of ongrowth between 6 and 24 months post-implantation. In the medium term, the use of a fully porous bridging collar may translate to a reduced incidence of aseptic loosening.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全多孔桥接环在下肢假体重建中的早期放射学效果:评估骨整合的病例匹配回顾性系列研究。
背景:在对原发性和继发性骨肿瘤进行节段性骨切除后,通常会使用假体置换进行肢体修复手术。本研究旨在评估全多孔桥接环是否能促进假体置换的早期骨整合:我们对所有采用全多孔骨膜桥接环设计的下肢假体进行了回顾性研究。根据手术适应症、植入物类型、切除长度、年龄和随访时间,我们将这一队列与传统的骨膜外非多孔全羟基磷灰石涂层槽袢队列进行了比对。植入后 6 个月、12 个月和 24 个月,对正交放射线照片上有无骨结合的皮质数量进行评估。每张X光片上的骨皮质数量从-4到+4不等,用于衡量骨与假体颈圈之间的骨皮质桥接情况。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法估算种植体的存活率,并采用配对 t 检验比较不同领圈设计在每个时间点上骨结合皮质的平均数量:对90名患者进行了回顾性鉴定和分析。经过排除,40 名使用多孔桥接环的患者和 40 名使用传统骨膜外无孔桥接环的患者被纳入研究(n = 80)。患者平均年龄为 63.4 岁(16-91 岁不等),其中男性 37 人,女性 43 人。两组的种植体存活率没有差异(P = 0.54)。6个月时,多孔桥接环组和无孔桥接环组影像学上生长的骨皮质平均数量分别为2.1个和0.3个(P 结论:多孔桥接环组和无孔桥接环组的骨皮质平均数量在6个月时没有差异:这些研究结果表明,全多孔桥接环增加了骨皮质的数量,并在植入后6至24个月期间有骨继续生长的迹象。相比之下,骨膜外骨袢在植入后 6 至 24 个月期间显示出的骨继续生长证据有所减少。从中期来看,使用全多孔桥接环可能会降低无菌性松动的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arthroplasty
Arthroplasty ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Conference Proceedings for the 10th Annual Meeting of Arthroplasty Society in Asia (ASIA), 26th Annual Meeting of the Thai Hip and Knee Society (THKS), and the 16th Annual Meeting of the ASEAN Arthroplasty Association (AAA). DAIR for periprosthetic joint infections-One week to save the joint? The distribution of Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) phenotypes in the Malaysian population and their correlation with demographic variables. What is the clinical utility of acoustic and vibrational analyses in uncemented total hip arthroplasty? Nanoparticle ultrasonication: a promising approach for reducing bacterial biofilm in total joint infection-an in vivo rat model investigation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1