Understanding visitor attitudes towards the timed-entry reservation system in Rocky Mountain National Park: Contemporary managed access as a social-ecological system

IF 3.6 3区 管理学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism-Research Planning and Management Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jort.2024.100736
Noah Creany , Christopher A. Monz , Scott M. Esser
{"title":"Understanding visitor attitudes towards the timed-entry reservation system in Rocky Mountain National Park: Contemporary managed access as a social-ecological system","authors":"Noah Creany ,&nbsp;Christopher A. Monz ,&nbsp;Scott M. Esser","doi":"10.1016/j.jort.2024.100736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Park and protected area (PPAs) management is often characterized by tightly interdependent social, ecological, and managerial dimensions that have increasingly been conceptualized as social-ecological systems (SES) to understand the complex interrelationships between these dimensions. Current trends of increasing visitation in U.S. National Parks have accentuated the complex interactions between the amount of recreation use, the quality of the visitor experience, ecological resource conditions, and the burden on management and the capacity of the setting. In order to manage visitor use in balance with desired social and ecological conditions and allocate opportunities for use in an equitable manner, several U.S. National Parks including Acadia (ME), Arches (UT), Glacier (MT), Rocky Mountain (CO), Shenandoah (VA), Yosemite (CA), and Zion (UT) are using advance-reservation or managed-access reservation systems. Rocky Mountain National Park (RMNP) implemented a Timed-Entry Reservation System (TEPS) which required visitors to place an online reservation for park access and allocated a fixed number of reservations per daily time period. RMNP managers employed the park's transportation system to target desired conditions and consequently moderate the flow of vehicles entering the park. We developed an email-based survey instrument to understand visitors' evaluations of their experience under the TEPS system and elicited their attitudes towards use-limiting strategies like TEPS. Our analysis found 78% of respondents reflected favorably on the TEPS managed-access park experience, although these attitudes are often value-laden and involve expectations about the conditions they experience. Our results provide a contemporary perspective on the assumptions in the rationing and allocation literature regarding the barriers and acceptability of these techniques for managing visitor use. Finally, we offer some insights and considerations from this analysis for managers considering similar managed-access strategies.</p></div><div><h3>Management implications</h3><p></p><ul><li><span>•</span><span><p>Conceptualizing a national park and associated managed-access process social-ecological systems illustrates connections between the visitor use and ecological dimensions of protected areas.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Managed-access reservations systems are a tool for management to balance recreation use alongside the resource conservation and management goals for the setting.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>This research reveals that Rocky Mountain National Park visitors are generally supportive of managed-access strategies, particularly for the safety of their experience and the sustainable management of ecological resource conditions for future generations' enjoyment.</p></span></li></ul></div>","PeriodicalId":46931,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism-Research Planning and Management","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 100736"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213078024000045/pdfft?md5=2643175ee0eb12b5f4c1edeeb6e6dd68&pid=1-s2.0-S2213078024000045-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism-Research Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213078024000045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Park and protected area (PPAs) management is often characterized by tightly interdependent social, ecological, and managerial dimensions that have increasingly been conceptualized as social-ecological systems (SES) to understand the complex interrelationships between these dimensions. Current trends of increasing visitation in U.S. National Parks have accentuated the complex interactions between the amount of recreation use, the quality of the visitor experience, ecological resource conditions, and the burden on management and the capacity of the setting. In order to manage visitor use in balance with desired social and ecological conditions and allocate opportunities for use in an equitable manner, several U.S. National Parks including Acadia (ME), Arches (UT), Glacier (MT), Rocky Mountain (CO), Shenandoah (VA), Yosemite (CA), and Zion (UT) are using advance-reservation or managed-access reservation systems. Rocky Mountain National Park (RMNP) implemented a Timed-Entry Reservation System (TEPS) which required visitors to place an online reservation for park access and allocated a fixed number of reservations per daily time period. RMNP managers employed the park's transportation system to target desired conditions and consequently moderate the flow of vehicles entering the park. We developed an email-based survey instrument to understand visitors' evaluations of their experience under the TEPS system and elicited their attitudes towards use-limiting strategies like TEPS. Our analysis found 78% of respondents reflected favorably on the TEPS managed-access park experience, although these attitudes are often value-laden and involve expectations about the conditions they experience. Our results provide a contemporary perspective on the assumptions in the rationing and allocation literature regarding the barriers and acceptability of these techniques for managing visitor use. Finally, we offer some insights and considerations from this analysis for managers considering similar managed-access strategies.

Management implications

  • Conceptualizing a national park and associated managed-access process social-ecological systems illustrates connections between the visitor use and ecological dimensions of protected areas.

  • Managed-access reservations systems are a tool for management to balance recreation use alongside the resource conservation and management goals for the setting.

  • This research reveals that Rocky Mountain National Park visitors are generally supportive of managed-access strategies, particularly for the safety of their experience and the sustainable management of ecological resource conditions for future generations' enjoyment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解游客对落基山国家公园定时进入预约系统的态度:作为一种社会生态系统的当代有管理的入口
公园和保护区 (PPA) 管理的特点通常是社会、生态和管理方面紧密相互依存,人们越来越多地将其概念化为社会生态系统 (SES),以理解这些方面之间复杂的相互关系。目前,美国国家公园的游客量呈上升趋势,这突出了娱乐使用量、游客体验质量、生态资源条件以及管理负担和环境容量之间的复杂互动关系。为了管理游客的使用,使其与理想的社会和生态条件保持平衡,并以公平的方式分配使用机会,包括阿卡迪亚(密歇根州)、拱门(犹他州)、冰川(山地州)、落基山(科罗拉多州)、雪兰多(弗吉尼亚州)、优胜美地(加利福尼亚州)和锡安(犹他州)在内的几个美国国家公园正在使用提前预约或管理进入预约系统。落基山国家公园 (RMNP) 实施了定时进入预约系统 (TEPS),要求游客在线预约进入公园,并在每天的时间段内分配固定数量的预约。RMNP 管理人员利用公园的交通系统,针对所需的条件,对进入公园的车辆流量进行调节。我们开发了一种基于电子邮件的调查工具,以了解游客对 TEPS 系统使用体验的评价,并激发他们对 TEPS 等限制使用策略的态度。我们的分析发现,78% 的受访者对 TEPS 系统管理下的公园游览体验给予了好评,尽管这些态度往往带有价值色彩,并涉及对游览条件的期望。我们的研究结果为配给和分配文献中关于游客使用管理技术的障碍和可接受性的假设提供了一个现代视角。管理意义-将国家公园和相关的可管理进入过程的社会-生态系统概念化,说明了游客使用和保护区生态层面之间的联系。-可管理进入保留系统是一种管理工具,用于平衡娱乐使用与资源保护和环境管理目标之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism offers a dedicated outlet for research relevant to social sciences and natural resources. The journal publishes peer reviewed original research on all aspects of outdoor recreation planning and management, covering the entire spectrum of settings from wilderness to urban outdoor recreation opportunities. It also focuses on new products and findings in nature based tourism and park management. JORT is an interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary journal, articles may focus on any aspect of theory, method, or concept of outdoor recreation research, planning or management, and interdisciplinary work is especially welcome, and may be of a theoretical and/or a case study nature. Depending on the topic of investigation, articles may be positioned within one academic discipline, or draw from several disciplines in an integrative manner, with overarching relevance to social sciences and natural resources. JORT is international in scope and attracts scholars from all reaches of the world to facilitate the exchange of ideas. As such, the journal enhances understanding of scientific knowledge, empirical results, and practitioners'' needs. Therefore in JORT each article is accompanied by an executive summary, written by the editors or authors, highlighting the planning and management relevant aspects of the article.
期刊最新文献
Dual trust, emotional bond, and tourists’ on-site pro-environmental behavior at nature-based destinations: Extending norm-activation theory from the perspective of social dilemma Navigating complexities in forest visitation modelling: Intersecting environmental, social, and public health factors during the COVID-19 pandemic Walking on sunshine: Application of a choice experiment to understand impacts of climate change on tourism attractions Towards a digital ranger: Using data from outdoor platforms to detect rule violations in protected areas and improve visitor management The influence of trekkers’ personal and subjective norms on their pro-environmental behaviors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1