Validación del Cuestionario de Experiencia de Curso para un programa de educación médica en línea de Perú

Q2 Social Sciences Educacion Medica Pub Date : 2024-03-02 DOI:10.1016/j.edumed.2024.100898
Javier A. Flores-Cohaila , Cesar A. Copaja-Corzo , Brayan Miranda-Chavez , Marco Rivarola-Hidalgo
{"title":"Validación del Cuestionario de Experiencia de Curso para un programa de educación médica en línea de Perú","authors":"Javier A. Flores-Cohaila ,&nbsp;Cesar A. Copaja-Corzo ,&nbsp;Brayan Miranda-Chavez ,&nbsp;Marco Rivarola-Hidalgo","doi":"10.1016/j.edumed.2024.100898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The growing number of online medical education programs demands rigorous evaluation. Previous studies have emphasized the importance of student perception in the effectiveness of these programs. Therefore, we aimed to adapt and validate the Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) for use in online medical education programs in Peru.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>An adaptation and validation study of the CEQ was conducted at a preparatory academy for the national medical examination in Peru. The questionnaire items were modified to suit our context and administered to 127 participants anonymously. Exploratory Factor Analysis with oblique rotation and reliability calculations with Cronbach's and McDonald's coefficients were performed. Then, the correlation of the CEQ and its domains with satisfaction and the program's impact was assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>83 participants responded, mainly sixth-year medical students. The analysis showed the suitability of the CEQ for factor analysis, with three factors identified that explained 59% of the total variance. The CEQ's reliability indices were high, indicating its consistency. The three domains identified were Adequate Teaching, Support, and Negative Program Experiences. Significant positive correlations were found between the total CEQ score, satisfaction measures, and perception of the program's impact.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The adapted CEQ showed evidence of validity for evaluating online medical education programs in Peru.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35317,"journal":{"name":"Educacion Medica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1575181324000135/pdfft?md5=9d5fb1c5a967b117ce6ff694a9d91948&pid=1-s2.0-S1575181324000135-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacion Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1575181324000135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The growing number of online medical education programs demands rigorous evaluation. Previous studies have emphasized the importance of student perception in the effectiveness of these programs. Therefore, we aimed to adapt and validate the Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) for use in online medical education programs in Peru.

Material and methods

An adaptation and validation study of the CEQ was conducted at a preparatory academy for the national medical examination in Peru. The questionnaire items were modified to suit our context and administered to 127 participants anonymously. Exploratory Factor Analysis with oblique rotation and reliability calculations with Cronbach's and McDonald's coefficients were performed. Then, the correlation of the CEQ and its domains with satisfaction and the program's impact was assessed.

Results

83 participants responded, mainly sixth-year medical students. The analysis showed the suitability of the CEQ for factor analysis, with three factors identified that explained 59% of the total variance. The CEQ's reliability indices were high, indicating its consistency. The three domains identified were Adequate Teaching, Support, and Negative Program Experiences. Significant positive correlations were found between the total CEQ score, satisfaction measures, and perception of the program's impact.

Conclusion

The adapted CEQ showed evidence of validity for evaluating online medical education programs in Peru.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
秘鲁在线医学教育项目课程体验问卷验证
导言:在线医学教育项目的数量越来越多,需要进行严格的评估。以往的研究强调了学生感知对这些项目有效性的重要性。因此,我们旨在对课程体验问卷(Course Experience Questionnaire,CEQ)进行改编和验证,以便在秘鲁的在线医学教育项目中使用。根据我们的情况对问卷项目进行了修改,并对 127 名参与者进行了匿名问卷调查。研究人员对问卷进行了探索性因子分析和斜向旋转,并用克朗巴赫系数和麦克唐纳系数计算了信度。然后,评估了 CEQ 及其领域与满意度和项目影响的相关性。结果 83 名参与者做出了回应,主要是六年级医学生。分析表明 CEQ 适合进行因子分析,确定了三个因子,解释了 59% 的总方差。CEQ 的可靠性指数很高,表明其具有一致性。确定的三个领域分别是充足的教学、支持和消极的项目经历。CEQ总分、满意度测量和对项目影响的感知之间存在显著的正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Educacion Medica
Educacion Medica Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Educación Médica, revista trimestral que se viene publicando desde 1998 es editada desde enero de 2003 por la Fundación Educación Médica. Pretende contribuir a la difusión de los estudios y trabajos que en este campo se están llevando a cabo en todo el mundo, pero de una manera especial en nuestro entorno. Los artículos de Educación Médica tratarán tanto sobre aspectos prácticos de la docencia en su día a día como sobre cuestiones más teóricas de la educación médica. Así mismo, la revista intentará proporcionar análisis y opiniones de expertos de reconocido prestigio internacional.
期刊最新文献
Una breve precisión acerca de las implicaciones educativas del concepto zona de desarrollo próximo Evaluación de un curso en línea de telemedicina a través de Facebook: un ensayo controlado aleatorizado Determinantes sociales de la salud y sociología de la salud: importancia de la formación sociosanitaria en las carreras de Medicina Cutting through the noise: unravelling the web of misinformation in surgical social networks Experiencia de uso de una herramienta para evaluar el realismo en simulaciones clínicas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1