The Perceived Influence Model of Trust: Toward a Multi-Trustee Theory

IF 4 2区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Group & Organization Management Pub Date : 2024-02-27 DOI:10.1177/10596011241235248
Lisa M. PytlikZillig, Ashley M. Votruba, Michelle M. Fleig-Palmer, Jooho Lee, Mariska Kappmeier
{"title":"The Perceived Influence Model of Trust: Toward a Multi-Trustee Theory","authors":"Lisa M. PytlikZillig, Ashley M. Votruba, Michelle M. Fleig-Palmer, Jooho Lee, Mariska Kappmeier","doi":"10.1177/10596011241235248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prior research investigating situations involving one trustor and multiple trustees often examines how a trustor’s trust in one party affects their amount of trust in another party. This paper fills a gap by predicting the effects of trust. The Perceived Influence (PI) Model of Trust is an individual-level model focused on the perceptions of a trustor. It builds upon the Mayer et al. (1995) model by integrating insights from literature on task interdependence and expanding to two trustees. The PI model describes and explains three possibilities for how a trustor’s trust in two trustees may combine to form a sense of aggregate multi-trustee trust via: (1) additive effects, such that the trustor’s trust in each of the trustees has independent effects on the aggregate; (2) compulsory effects, such that increasing the amount of trust in one trustee increases the effect of trust in the other trustee; and (3) compensatory effects, such that increasing trust in one trustee decreases the effect of trust in the other trustee. We propose that the theoretical mechanism explaining which of these three possibilities takes place is the trustor’s perceived influence of the trustees, which is tightly linked to perceptions of task requirements necessary to attenuate the trustor’s risk. The PI model begins to fill an important gap in the literature pertaining to pervasive, but rarely considered, multi-trustee situations, and proposes the importance of trustor perceptions of trustee influence and task requirements for future models of trust.","PeriodicalId":48143,"journal":{"name":"Group & Organization Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Group & Organization Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011241235248","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prior research investigating situations involving one trustor and multiple trustees often examines how a trustor’s trust in one party affects their amount of trust in another party. This paper fills a gap by predicting the effects of trust. The Perceived Influence (PI) Model of Trust is an individual-level model focused on the perceptions of a trustor. It builds upon the Mayer et al. (1995) model by integrating insights from literature on task interdependence and expanding to two trustees. The PI model describes and explains three possibilities for how a trustor’s trust in two trustees may combine to form a sense of aggregate multi-trustee trust via: (1) additive effects, such that the trustor’s trust in each of the trustees has independent effects on the aggregate; (2) compulsory effects, such that increasing the amount of trust in one trustee increases the effect of trust in the other trustee; and (3) compensatory effects, such that increasing trust in one trustee decreases the effect of trust in the other trustee. We propose that the theoretical mechanism explaining which of these three possibilities takes place is the trustor’s perceived influence of the trustees, which is tightly linked to perceptions of task requirements necessary to attenuate the trustor’s risk. The PI model begins to fill an important gap in the literature pertaining to pervasive, but rarely considered, multi-trustee situations, and proposes the importance of trustor perceptions of trustee influence and task requirements for future models of trust.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信任的感知影响模型:建立多受托人理论
以往的研究在调查涉及一个受托人和多个受托人的情况时,通常会研究受托人对一方的信任如何影响其对另一方的信任程度。本文通过预测信任的影响来填补这一空白。信任的感知影响(PI)模型是一个个人层面的模型,侧重于信任者的感知。它以 Mayer 等人(1995 年)的模型为基础,整合了任务相互依赖文献中的见解,并扩展到两个受托人。PI 模型描述并解释了受托人对两个受托人的信任如何通过以下三种可能性结合在一起,形成对多受托人的总体信任感:(1) 叠加效应,即受托人对每个受托人的信任都会对总体产生独立影响;(2) 强制效应,即增加对一个受托人的信任会增加对另一个受托人的信任;(3) 补偿效应,即增加对一个受托人的信任会减少对另一个受托人的信任。我们提出,解释这三种可能性的理论机制是受托人对受托人影响力的感知,这种感知与减轻受托人风险所必需的任务要求的感知紧密相关。PI 模型开始填补文献中关于普遍存在但很少被考虑的多受托人情况的重要空白,并提出了受托人对受托人影响和任务要求的感知对未来信任模型的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Group & Organization Management (GOM) publishes the work of scholars and professionals who extend management and organization theory and address the implications of this for practitioners. Innovation, conceptual sophistication, methodological rigor, and cutting-edge scholarship are the driving principles. Topics include teams, group processes, leadership, organizational behavior, organizational theory, strategic management, organizational communication, gender and diversity, cross-cultural analysis, and organizational development and change, but all articles dealing with individual, group, organizational and/or environmental dimensions are appropriate.
期刊最新文献
Drivers for Nominating First Women Executives: Empirical Evidence From Japanese Firms The Value of Small Samples to Groups and Teams Research: Accumulating Knowledge across Philosophies of Science It’s About Time! Understanding the Dynamic Team Process-Performance Relationship Using Micro- and Macroscale Time Lenses Women’s Double Penalty During Telework: A Mixed Method Investigation of the Gender Effect of Interruptions Between Work and Childcare When Does Entrepreneurs’ Impression Management Enhance Their Networking Performance? The Cross-Level Moderating Role of Collective Altruism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1