An empirical study on traditional offline retailer’s switching intention towards community-based group buying program: A push–pull-mooring model

IF 7.1 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Electronic Markets Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1007/s12525-024-00702-6
Zihan Guan, Xiaoran Shi, Huajing Ying, Ruhui Xue, Xiaojiao Qiao
{"title":"An empirical study on traditional offline retailer’s switching intention towards community-based group buying program: A push–pull-mooring model","authors":"Zihan Guan, Xiaoran Shi, Huajing Ying, Ruhui Xue, Xiaojiao Qiao","doi":"10.1007/s12525-024-00702-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To enter the offline channel, the community-based group buying (CGB) platform usually recruits group leaders to perform corresponding tasks (i.e., creating new customers, information disseminating, marketing, and goods delivering). A major type of group leader is the traditional offline retailer, who runs a convenience store in the community and is considered as the core bond among three parties, namely, platforms, merchants, and consumers. Drawing upon the PPM theory and TAM model, this study aims to investigate the switching intention of traditional offline retailers to embrace platform’s recruitment and undertake group leader roles towards the CGB program. With primary data collected from 365 respondents, we establish a structural equation model and conduct the empirical analysis. Results suggest that both push and pull factors exert positive effects on convenience storekeepers’ switching intention, while the perceived risk (i.e., one of the mooring factors) hinders the switching intention. However, switching cost, as another mooring factor, does not significantly predict the switching intention. These additional constructs in the push–pull-mooring (PPM) model are considerably helpful for improving the understanding of traditional offline retailer’s switching intention towards community-based group buying and could offer several managerial implications for group buying platforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":47719,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Markets","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Markets","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-024-00702-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To enter the offline channel, the community-based group buying (CGB) platform usually recruits group leaders to perform corresponding tasks (i.e., creating new customers, information disseminating, marketing, and goods delivering). A major type of group leader is the traditional offline retailer, who runs a convenience store in the community and is considered as the core bond among three parties, namely, platforms, merchants, and consumers. Drawing upon the PPM theory and TAM model, this study aims to investigate the switching intention of traditional offline retailers to embrace platform’s recruitment and undertake group leader roles towards the CGB program. With primary data collected from 365 respondents, we establish a structural equation model and conduct the empirical analysis. Results suggest that both push and pull factors exert positive effects on convenience storekeepers’ switching intention, while the perceived risk (i.e., one of the mooring factors) hinders the switching intention. However, switching cost, as another mooring factor, does not significantly predict the switching intention. These additional constructs in the push–pull-mooring (PPM) model are considerably helpful for improving the understanding of traditional offline retailer’s switching intention towards community-based group buying and could offer several managerial implications for group buying platforms.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
传统线下零售商转向社区团购计划意向的实证研究:推拉移动模型
为了进入线下渠道,社区团购(CGB)平台通常会招募团长来完成相应的任务(即创造新客户、信息传播、市场营销和商品交付)。团长的主要类型是传统的线下零售商,他们在社区中经营便利店,被视为平台、商家和消费者三方之间的核心纽带。本研究借鉴 PPM 理论和 TAM 模型,旨在探究传统线下零售商接受平台招募并承担 CGB 项目群主角色的转换意向。通过收集 365 名受访者的原始数据,我们建立了一个结构方程模型并进行了实证分析。结果表明,推力和拉力因素都对便利店店主的转换意向产生了积极影响,而感知风险(即停泊因素之一)则阻碍了转换意向的产生。然而,转换成本作为另一个锚定因素,对转换意向的预测并不显著。推-拉-锚定(PPM)模型中的这些附加构念大大有助于加深对传统线下零售商转向社区团购意向的理解,并可为团购平台提供一些管理启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Electronic Markets
Electronic Markets Multiple-
CiteScore
14.80
自引率
15.30%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: Electronic Markets (EM) stands as a premier academic journal providing a dynamic platform for research into various forms of networked business. Recognizing the pivotal role of information and communication technology (ICT), EM delves into how ICT transforms the interactions between organizations and customers across diverse domains such as social networks, electronic commerce, supply chain management, and customer relationship management. Electronic markets, in essence, encompass the realms of networked business where multiple suppliers and customers engage in economic transactions within single or multiple tiers of economic value chains. This broad concept encompasses various forms, including allocation platforms with dynamic price discovery mechanisms, fostering atomistic relationships. Notable examples originate from financial markets (e.g., CBOT, XETRA) and energy markets (e.g., EEX, ICE). Join us in exploring the multifaceted landscape of electronic markets and their transformative impact on business interactions and dynamics.
期刊最新文献
Digital Business as a Field for Research and Education Certified data chats for future used car markets How online exposure to nature affects customer engagement: Evidence from Sina Weibo Critical success factors of users’ continuous intention of adopting cryptocurrency exchanges: LAS-VICT principle On the influence of conventional and automated market makers on market quality in cryptoeconomic systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1