Peter Sheldon, Edoardo Della Torre, Luca Carollo, Raoul Nacamulli
{"title":"Employer associations, adaptive innovation and common goods: An integrated framework","authors":"Peter Sheldon, Edoardo Della Torre, Luca Carollo, Raoul Nacamulli","doi":"10.1111/bjir.12796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article proposes a new theoretical framework of employer association (EA) adaptive innovation, a strategic organizational response to challenging environments facing EAs and/or relevant firms. Through adaptive innovation, EAs can enlarge their span of service offerings beyond collective, selective and elective goods, services typically explained by Olson-inspired, market-transactional theorizing. We identify, explain and conceptualize EA shifts into <i>also</i> offering common goods as community-building, relational types of collective action. Territorial ecosystems are one prominent new domain for this type of strategic adaptive intervention. In our illustrative case, this involves collectively organizing an open innovation ecosystem beyond an EA's own walls. Ostrom's theorizing on the governance of the commons better explains these initiatives than Olson's. Our new framework, therefore, integrates Ostrom's with Olson's theories. In broadening the field's understanding of EA strategic opportunities, this article also opens prominent lines of inquiry for future EA research.</p>","PeriodicalId":47846,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Industrial Relations","volume":"62 3","pages":"674-698"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjir.12796","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Industrial Relations","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjir.12796","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article proposes a new theoretical framework of employer association (EA) adaptive innovation, a strategic organizational response to challenging environments facing EAs and/or relevant firms. Through adaptive innovation, EAs can enlarge their span of service offerings beyond collective, selective and elective goods, services typically explained by Olson-inspired, market-transactional theorizing. We identify, explain and conceptualize EA shifts into also offering common goods as community-building, relational types of collective action. Territorial ecosystems are one prominent new domain for this type of strategic adaptive intervention. In our illustrative case, this involves collectively organizing an open innovation ecosystem beyond an EA's own walls. Ostrom's theorizing on the governance of the commons better explains these initiatives than Olson's. Our new framework, therefore, integrates Ostrom's with Olson's theories. In broadening the field's understanding of EA strategic opportunities, this article also opens prominent lines of inquiry for future EA research.
本文提出了雇主协会适应性创新的新理论框架,这是雇主协会和/或相关企业对所面临的挑战性环境做出的战略性组织回应。通过适应性创新,雇主协会可以扩大其提供的服务范围,而不仅仅局限于集体性、选择性和选择性产品,这些服务通常由奥尔森启发的市场交易理论来解释。我们确定、解释并概念化了经济活动机构的转变,使其也能提供作为社区建设、关系型集体行动的共同产品。领土生态系统是这种战略适应性干预的一个突出的新领域。在我们的示例中,这涉及在 EA 自身围墙之外集体组织一个开放式创新生态系统。与奥尔森的理论相比,奥斯特罗姆的公地治理理论能更好地解释这些举措。因此,我们的新框架整合了奥斯特罗姆和奥尔森的理论。本文拓宽了该领域对 EA 战略机遇的理解,也为未来的 EA 研究开辟了重要的探索方向。
期刊介绍:
BJIR (British Journal of Industrial Relations) is an influential and authoritative journal which is essential reading for all academics and practitioners interested in work and employment relations. It is the highest ranked European journal in the Industrial Relations & Labour category of the Social Sciences Citation Index. BJIR aims to present the latest research on developments on employment and work from across the globe that appeal to an international readership. Contributions are drawn from all of the main social science disciplines, deal with a broad range of employment topics and express a range of viewpoints.