Adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of NOSE-Perf questionnaire for septal perforations

{"title":"Adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of NOSE-Perf questionnaire for septal perforations","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.otoeng.2024.01.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><p>Septal perforation (SP) cause heterogeneous symptoms depending on the anatomical location, highlighting scabs, nasal obstruction and/or epistaxis. The use of questionnaires to determine the quality of life in different pathologies is increasing in sinonasal pathologies and in patients with SP the NOSE-Perf questionnaire was constructed, currently validated in English. The aim of this study is the translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the NOSE-Perf questionnaire into Spanish.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Prospective single-centre study of 81 patients (38 with SP and 43 controls), visited in the rhinology section of a tertiary hospital. Adaptation and translation NOSE-Perf into Spanish and validation using the NOSE and NOSE-Perf questionnaire in Spanish.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Significant differences were found in the mean NOSE-Perf score and in the mean NOSE score (IC95% = 21.2–26.9; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001 and IC95% = 53.8–70.5; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) between SP group and control group. Pearson's correlation between the two questionnaires NOSE-Perf and NOSE in the SP group was 0.74 (95% CI = 0.56−0.86; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). In the control group it was <em>r</em> = 0.85 (95%CI = 0.73−0.91; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the NOSE-Perf was 0.95 (IC 95% = 0.93−0.96) for internal consistency. The reliability evaluation was carried out by test-retest, and a strong Pearson correlation was obtained between the questionnaires <em>r</em> = 0.94 (CI95% = 0.85−0.97; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and <em>r</em> = 0.89 (95%CI = 0.77−0.95; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The Spanish version of the NOSE-Perf is as reliable and valid as the English version, which makes it possible to assess the impact on quality of life that it causes in patients with perforations in the Spanish-speaking population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93855,"journal":{"name":"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola","volume":"75 4","pages":"Pages 231-237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173573524000437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective

Septal perforation (SP) cause heterogeneous symptoms depending on the anatomical location, highlighting scabs, nasal obstruction and/or epistaxis. The use of questionnaires to determine the quality of life in different pathologies is increasing in sinonasal pathologies and in patients with SP the NOSE-Perf questionnaire was constructed, currently validated in English. The aim of this study is the translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the NOSE-Perf questionnaire into Spanish.

Material and methods

Prospective single-centre study of 81 patients (38 with SP and 43 controls), visited in the rhinology section of a tertiary hospital. Adaptation and translation NOSE-Perf into Spanish and validation using the NOSE and NOSE-Perf questionnaire in Spanish.

Results

Significant differences were found in the mean NOSE-Perf score and in the mean NOSE score (IC95% = 21.2–26.9; p < 0.001 and IC95% = 53.8–70.5; p < 0.001) between SP group and control group. Pearson's correlation between the two questionnaires NOSE-Perf and NOSE in the SP group was 0.74 (95% CI = 0.56−0.86; p < 0.001). In the control group it was r = 0.85 (95%CI = 0.73−0.91; p < 0.001). Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the NOSE-Perf was 0.95 (IC 95% = 0.93−0.96) for internal consistency. The reliability evaluation was carried out by test-retest, and a strong Pearson correlation was obtained between the questionnaires r = 0.94 (CI95% = 0.85−0.97; p < 0.001) and r = 0.89 (95%CI = 0.77−0.95; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The Spanish version of the NOSE-Perf is as reliable and valid as the English version, which makes it possible to assess the impact on quality of life that it causes in patients with perforations in the Spanish-speaking population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对房间隔穿孔的 NOSE-Perf 问卷西班牙文版的改编和验证。
背景和目的:鼻中隔穿孔(SP)会因解剖位置不同而导致不同的症状,突出表现为结痂、鼻塞和/或鼻衄。在鼻窦病变中,越来越多地使用调查问卷来确定不同病变的生活质量,并针对鼻中隔穿孔患者设计了 NOSE-Perf 问卷,该问卷目前已通过英语验证。本研究的目的是将 NOSE-Perf 问卷翻译成西班牙语,并进行跨文化调整和验证:材料和方法:对一家三级医院鼻科就诊的 81 名患者(38 名 SP 患者和 43 名对照组患者)进行前瞻性单中心研究。将 NOSE-Perf 改编和翻译成西班牙语,并使用西班牙语 NOSE 和 NOSE-Perf 问卷进行验证:结果:NOSE-Perf 的平均得分与 NOSE 的平均得分存在显著差异(IC95% = 21,2-26,9;P西班牙语版本的 NOSE-Perf 与英语版本一样可靠有效,因此可以评估其对西班牙语人群中穿孔患者生活质量的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of the Impact of Post-COVID-19 Olfactory Dysfunction on Quality of Life: Comparison of Specific Questionnaires. Spanish multidisciplinary consensus on the diagnosis and management of laryngopharyngeal reflux (ReFaL Consensus). Comment on "Results of the Spanish versions of the Chronic Otitis Media Questionnaire-12 (COMQ-12) and the Chronic Otitis Media Benefits Inventory (COMBI) in patients and controls in our setting". Laryngeal involvement in a patient with indolent T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder of the gastrointestinal tract. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Spanish version of the Nasal Polyposis Quality of Life Questionnaire (NPQ).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1