“We Are Bulletproof”: The Transcultural Power of Fandom in #StopAsianHate1

IF 2.2 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Sociological Inquiry Pub Date : 2024-02-27 DOI:10.1111/soin.12590
Amy Zhang, Christina Ong
{"title":"“We Are Bulletproof”: The Transcultural Power of Fandom in #StopAsianHate1","authors":"Amy Zhang, Christina Ong","doi":"10.1111/soin.12590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fears of COVID‐19, alongside existing anti‐Asian sentiment, resulted in 11,467 documented hate incidents against Asians/Asian Americans in the United States between March 2020 and March 2022, per the Stop AAPI Hate Reporting Center. In response, #StopAsianHate and #StopAAPIHate were used on Twitter to increase public awareness. Considering anti‐Asian racism transcends geographic boundaries, we interrogate: how does engagement with these hashtags reflect the transculturality of responses to anti‐Asian racism in a digital environment? We analyzed 920,271 tweets between March 19, 2020, and May 31, 2022, containing either hashtag, defining a “spike” in engagement as any day with >5,000 tweets, and found that of 25 spikes, 11 immediately followed the 2021 Atlanta‐area shootings—however, another 12 spikes were related to South Korean megagroup BTS. We further compare the results of two topic modeling methods, LDA and NMF, to examine how the use of and engagement with these hashtags shift over time primarily due to BTS fans (“ARMY”). This work joins emerging scholarship on race, fandom, and activism through cultural production in order to advance our collective understanding of modern digital activism and racial politics. Overall, we interrogate fandom's contributions to combating anti‐Asian sentiment, build on existing literature exploring the potential for fandoms to advocate for social justice, and argue that the transculturality of BTS, ARMY, and their affective ties represent an opportunity for accessible global discourse about anti‐Asian racism.","PeriodicalId":47699,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Inquiry","volume":"92 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12590","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fears of COVID‐19, alongside existing anti‐Asian sentiment, resulted in 11,467 documented hate incidents against Asians/Asian Americans in the United States between March 2020 and March 2022, per the Stop AAPI Hate Reporting Center. In response, #StopAsianHate and #StopAAPIHate were used on Twitter to increase public awareness. Considering anti‐Asian racism transcends geographic boundaries, we interrogate: how does engagement with these hashtags reflect the transculturality of responses to anti‐Asian racism in a digital environment? We analyzed 920,271 tweets between March 19, 2020, and May 31, 2022, containing either hashtag, defining a “spike” in engagement as any day with >5,000 tweets, and found that of 25 spikes, 11 immediately followed the 2021 Atlanta‐area shootings—however, another 12 spikes were related to South Korean megagroup BTS. We further compare the results of two topic modeling methods, LDA and NMF, to examine how the use of and engagement with these hashtags shift over time primarily due to BTS fans (“ARMY”). This work joins emerging scholarship on race, fandom, and activism through cultural production in order to advance our collective understanding of modern digital activism and racial politics. Overall, we interrogate fandom's contributions to combating anti‐Asian sentiment, build on existing literature exploring the potential for fandoms to advocate for social justice, and argue that the transculturality of BTS, ARMY, and their affective ties represent an opportunity for accessible global discourse about anti‐Asian racism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"我们刀枪不入粉丝在 #StopAsianHate1 中的跨文化力量
对 COVID-19 的恐惧,加上现有的反亚裔情绪,导致在 2020 年 3 月至 2022 年 3 月期间,根据 "停止亚裔美国人仇恨报告中心"(Stop AAPI Hate Reporting Center)的记录,美国发生了 11,467 起针对亚裔/亚裔美国人的仇恨事件。为此,推特上出现了 #StopAsianHate 和 #StopAAPIHate 以提高公众意识。考虑到反亚裔种族主义超越了地域界限,我们提出了以下问题:在数字环境中,与这些标签的互动如何反映出反亚裔种族主义对策的跨文化性?我们分析了 2020 年 3 月 19 日至 2022 年 5 月 31 日期间 920,271 条包含其中任一标签的推文,并将参与度 "峰值 "定义为推文数量达到 5,000 条的任何一天,结果发现,在 25 个峰值中,有 11 个紧随 2021 年亚特兰大地区枪击案之后--不过,另有 12 个峰值与韩国超人气组合 BTS 有关。我们进一步比较了 LDA 和 NMF 两种主题建模方法的结果,以研究这些标签的使用和参与如何随着时间的推移而变化,这主要是由于 BTS 的粉丝("ARMY")造成的。这项研究通过文化生产,加入了有关种族、粉丝和行动主义的新兴学术研究,以促进我们对现代数字行动主义和种族政治的集体理解。总之,我们审视了粉丝对打击反亚裔情绪的贡献,在现有文献的基础上探讨了粉丝倡导社会正义的潜力,并认为 BTS、ARMY 的跨文化性及其情感纽带代表了一种机会,可借以开展有关反亚裔种族主义的全球讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Sociological Inquiry (SI) is committed to the exploration of the human condition in all of its social and cultural complexity. Its papers challenge us to look anew at traditional areas or identify novel areas for investigation. SI publishes both theoretical and empirical work as well as varied research methods in the study of social and cultural life.
期刊最新文献
Anticipatory Race‐Related Stress and Depressive Symptoms Among U.S. Black Women Attending a Historically Black University: Are Psychosocial Resources Stress Buffers? Working Time, Income Inequality, and Life Expectancy: A Longitudinal Analysis of US States, 2005–2018 “We May Look Like Cream‐of‐the‐Crop Kids, but it's Tough Here”: Elite Identity, Emotional Burden, and Ethical Transgressions Among Students at an Elite High School “Don't Touch!”: The Role of Cultural Knowledge in Low‐SES Parents' Perceptions of Museums Does Social Trust Travel? Comparing Resident and Non‐resident Citizens from a High‐Trusting Country
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1