Policy Responses To Fake News On Social Media Platforms: A Law And Economics Analysis

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW Statute Law Review Pub Date : 2024-02-27 DOI:10.1093/slr/hmae013
Devansh Kaushik
{"title":"Policy Responses To Fake News On Social Media Platforms: A Law And Economics Analysis","authors":"Devansh Kaushik","doi":"10.1093/slr/hmae013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fake News is one of the major techno-policy challenges faced by modern societies. As popular discourse shifts to social media platforms, Fake News on the internet has increased drastically, generating significant costs for society. Consequently, there is a regulatory movement across the globe to mitigate fake news on these platforms. A law and economics analysis offers valuable insights towards devising an appropriate regulatory approach to tackling this issue. In economic terms, Fake News can be conceptualized as a negative externality, while Fact-Checking and Content Moderation Services may be defined as public goods. There exists a misplaced individual incentive to create fake news on social media platforms. A clear case of market failure and thus a need for state intervention can be made out. While direct state regulation of platforms is the preferred approach by regulators for mitigating fake news, this paper cautions against over-reliance on such a ‘negative state’ regime, due to censorship risks and enforcement costs. This paper recommends adoption of a multi-pronged strategy, including a statutory Pigouvian tax to internalize social costs of fake news on social media platforms within the market, by channelling resources towards promoting positive state measures to mitigate the broader effects of fake news on these platforms. This paper’s analysis is largely located in the Indian context, with references to other jurisdictions.","PeriodicalId":43737,"journal":{"name":"Statute Law Review","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statute Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmae013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fake News is one of the major techno-policy challenges faced by modern societies. As popular discourse shifts to social media platforms, Fake News on the internet has increased drastically, generating significant costs for society. Consequently, there is a regulatory movement across the globe to mitigate fake news on these platforms. A law and economics analysis offers valuable insights towards devising an appropriate regulatory approach to tackling this issue. In economic terms, Fake News can be conceptualized as a negative externality, while Fact-Checking and Content Moderation Services may be defined as public goods. There exists a misplaced individual incentive to create fake news on social media platforms. A clear case of market failure and thus a need for state intervention can be made out. While direct state regulation of platforms is the preferred approach by regulators for mitigating fake news, this paper cautions against over-reliance on such a ‘negative state’ regime, due to censorship risks and enforcement costs. This paper recommends adoption of a multi-pronged strategy, including a statutory Pigouvian tax to internalize social costs of fake news on social media platforms within the market, by channelling resources towards promoting positive state measures to mitigate the broader effects of fake news on these platforms. This paper’s analysis is largely located in the Indian context, with references to other jurisdictions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社交媒体平台上假新闻的对策:法律与经济学分析
假新闻是现代社会面临的主要技术政策挑战之一。随着大众言论向社交媒体平台转移,互联网上的假新闻急剧增加,给社会造成了巨大损失。因此,全球各地都在开展监管运动,以减少这些平台上的假新闻。法律和经济学分析为制定适当的监管方法解决这一问题提供了宝贵的见解。从经济学角度看,假新闻可被视为一种负外部性,而事实核查和内容审核服务则可被定义为公共产品。在社交媒体平台上制造假新闻的个人动机是错位的。这显然是市场失灵,因此需要国家干预。虽然国家对平台的直接监管是监管机构减少假新闻的首选方法,但本文提醒不要过度依赖这种 "消极国家 "制度,因为这存在审查风险和执法成本。本文建议采取多管齐下的策略,包括征收法定的皮格夫税,将社交媒体平台上虚假新闻的社会成本内化到市场中,将资源用于促进积极的国家措施,以减轻这些平台上虚假新闻的广泛影响。本文的分析主要以印度为背景,同时参考了其他司法管辖区的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: The principal objectives of the Review are to provide a vehicle for the consideration of the legislative process, the use of legislation as an instrument of public policy and of the drafting and interpretation of legislation. The Review, which was first established in 1980, is the only journal of its kind within the Commonwealth. It is of particular value to lawyers in both private practice and in public service, and to academics, both lawyers and political scientists, who write and teach within the field of legislation.
期刊最新文献
Revisiting Criminal Law Bills: An In-Depth Critical Analysis of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Bill and Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Bill Four Years of Anti-COVID-19 Regulations in Greece: Overview of the Legislative and Regulatory Process and of an Exemplary Administrative Codification Two Uses of Purpose in Statutory Interpretation Climate Volatility, Foundational Freedoms, and the Environment Act 2021: The Transformative Potential of the Principle of Legality Protection of Athletes’ Rights in International Sports Organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1