Improving post-concussion discharge education for families seeking emergency department care: intervention development.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Brain injury Pub Date : 2024-05-11 Epub Date: 2024-03-05 DOI:10.1080/02699052.2024.2318595
Emily Kroshus, Mary Kathleen Steiner, Sara P D Chrisman, K Casey Lion, Frederick Rivara, Sarah J Lowry, Bonnie Strelitz, Eileen J Klein
{"title":"Improving post-concussion discharge education for families seeking emergency department care: intervention development.","authors":"Emily Kroshus, Mary Kathleen Steiner, Sara P D Chrisman, K Casey Lion, Frederick Rivara, Sarah J Lowry, Bonnie Strelitz, Eileen J Klein","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2318595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pediatric emergency departments (ED) are where many families receive post-concussion medical care and thus an important context for helping parents build skills to support their child after discharge.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Develop a strategy for increasing parent provision of emotional and instrumental support to their child after discharge and conduct a pilot test of this strategy's acceptability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a large pediatric ED in the United States, we partnered with parents (<i>n</i> = 15) and clinicians (<i>n</i> = 15) to understand needs and constraints related to discharge education and to operationalize a strategy to feasibly address these needs. This produced a brief daily text message intervention for parents for 10 days post-discharge. We used a sequential cohort design to assess the acceptability this intervention and its efficacy in changing parenting practices in the 2-weeks post-discharge (<i>n</i> = 98 parents).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Parents who received the messaging intervention rated it as highly acceptable and had meaningfully higher scores for emotionally supportive communication with their child in the two weeks post-discharge than parents in the control condition (Cohen's d = 0.65, <i>p</i> = 0.021).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This brief messaging intervention is a promising strategy for enhancing discharge education post-concussion that warrants further evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"479-488"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11283255/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain injury","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2024.2318595","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pediatric emergency departments (ED) are where many families receive post-concussion medical care and thus an important context for helping parents build skills to support their child after discharge.

Objective: Develop a strategy for increasing parent provision of emotional and instrumental support to their child after discharge and conduct a pilot test of this strategy's acceptability.

Methods: In a large pediatric ED in the United States, we partnered with parents (n = 15) and clinicians (n = 15) to understand needs and constraints related to discharge education and to operationalize a strategy to feasibly address these needs. This produced a brief daily text message intervention for parents for 10 days post-discharge. We used a sequential cohort design to assess the acceptability this intervention and its efficacy in changing parenting practices in the 2-weeks post-discharge (n = 98 parents).

Results: Parents who received the messaging intervention rated it as highly acceptable and had meaningfully higher scores for emotionally supportive communication with their child in the two weeks post-discharge than parents in the control condition (Cohen's d = 0.65, p = 0.021).

Conclusions: This brief messaging intervention is a promising strategy for enhancing discharge education post-concussion that warrants further evaluation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善针对急诊科就诊家庭的脑震荡后出院教育:干预措施的开发。
背景:儿科急诊室(ED)是许多家庭接受脑震荡后医疗护理的地方,因此也是帮助家长培养在孩子出院后为其提供支持的技能的重要场所:目标:制定一项策略,让家长在孩子出院后为其提供更多情感和工具支持,并对该策略的可接受性进行试点测试:方法:在美国的一家大型儿科急诊室,我们与家长(15 人)和临床医生(15 人)合作,了解与出院教育相关的需求和限制因素,并制定可行的策略来满足这些需求。这就产生了出院后 10 天内针对家长的每日简短短信干预。我们采用了连续队列设计来评估这一干预措施的可接受性及其在出院后两周内改变育儿方式的效果(n = 98 名家长):结果:与对照组相比,接受信息干预的家长对干预的接受度很高,出院后两周内与孩子进行情感支持性沟通的得分也明显较高(Cohen's d = 0.65, p = 0.021):这种简短的信息干预是加强脑震荡后出院教育的一种有前途的策略,值得进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brain injury
Brain injury 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
148
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Brain Injury publishes critical information relating to research and clinical practice, adult and pediatric populations. The journal covers a full range of relevant topics relating to clinical, translational, and basic science research. Manuscripts address emergency and acute medical care, acute and post-acute rehabilitation, family and vocational issues, and long-term supports. Coverage includes assessment and interventions for functional, communication, neurological and psychological disorders.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of concordance and predictive validity of head injuries from parental reports and medical records. Leaving on a Jet Plane: reflections on working with a patient with complex acquired brain injury secondary to attempted suicide. Barriers and enablers to physical activity for individuals living with traumatic brain injury: a mixed methods systematic review. Approach to adult Moyamoya disease presenting as bilateral anterior circulation infarcts: a case report. The correlation between the severity of paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity and plasma catecholamine levels in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1