Pub Date : 2025-12-09DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2025.2596227
Slavko Budinski, Dragan Nikolić, Janko Pasternak, Sanja Stojanović, Vladimir Manojlović, Nikola Batinić, Katarina Petrović
Background and aims: New ischemic brain lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) occur frequently after carotid revascularization, yet their predictors and clinical significance remain incompletely characterized. This study aimed to determine the incidence, risk factors, and prognostic implications of diffusion-weighted imaging lesions (DWILs) following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS), with particular emphasis on cerebral oximetry monitoring.
Methods: This prospective, single-center cohort study enrolled 195 consecutive patients undergoing carotid revascularization between 2018 and 2021. All patients underwent pre- and post-procedural DW-MRI within 24 hours. Regional cerebral oxygen saturation was continuously monitored using INVOS™ cerebral oximetry. The primary outcome was new DWIL incidence. Secondary outcomes included 30-day stroke/death and 36-month mortality.
Results: DWILs occurred in 68 patients, with higher incidence after CAS than CEA. Independent predictors included symptomatic stenosis, diabetes mellitus, intraprocedural hypotension, unstable plaque morphology, and INVOS desaturation >20%. The 30-day stroke/death rate was 2.1% with no difference between procedures. At 36 months, patients with DWILs showed a trend toward higher mortality.
Conclusions: DWILs occur in one-third of carotid revascularization patients, more frequently after CAS. Cerebral oxygen desaturation >20% represents a potentially modifiable risk factor. While predominantly asymptomatic acutely, DWILs associate with long-term mortality.
{"title":"Cerebral oximetry and predictors of diffusion-weighted lesions after carotid endarterectomy and stenting.","authors":"Slavko Budinski, Dragan Nikolić, Janko Pasternak, Sanja Stojanović, Vladimir Manojlović, Nikola Batinić, Katarina Petrović","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2025.2596227","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2025.2596227","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>New ischemic brain lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) occur frequently after carotid revascularization, yet their predictors and clinical significance remain incompletely characterized. This study aimed to determine the incidence, risk factors, and prognostic implications of diffusion-weighted imaging lesions (DWILs) following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS), with particular emphasis on cerebral oximetry monitoring.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, single-center cohort study enrolled 195 consecutive patients undergoing carotid revascularization between 2018 and 2021. All patients underwent pre- and post-procedural DW-MRI within 24 hours. Regional cerebral oxygen saturation was continuously monitored using INVOS™ cerebral oximetry. The primary outcome was new DWIL incidence. Secondary outcomes included 30-day stroke/death and 36-month mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DWILs occurred in 68 patients, with higher incidence after CAS than CEA. Independent predictors included symptomatic stenosis, diabetes mellitus, intraprocedural hypotension, unstable plaque morphology, and INVOS desaturation >20%. The 30-day stroke/death rate was 2.1% with no difference between procedures. At 36 months, patients with DWILs showed a trend toward higher mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DWILs occur in one-third of carotid revascularization patients, more frequently after CAS. Cerebral oxygen desaturation >20% represents a potentially modifiable risk factor. While predominantly asymptomatic acutely, DWILs associate with long-term mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145707246","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-05DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2025.2595095
Gordon J Horn, Frank D Lewis, Myriam Lacerte, Mel B Glenn
Background: Research shows that 11-34% of patients continue with agitation following acquired neurological injury after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation.
Objective: Study objectives included 1) determining the efficacy of post hospital brain injury specialty programs, 2) determining outcomes by program type, and 3) focusing on the chronic phase of injury recovery (9-60 months post injury).
Methods: Subjects (N = 437) were selected from 854 neurologically impaired adults with consecutive discharges from post-hospital networked rehabilitation programs in 24 states from 2011 to 2021. The sample included TBI, CVA, and Mixed neurological groups with at least mild behavioral impairment measured by the Mayo Portland Adaptability Inventory-4 Irritability score. The Participation Index was used for admission and discharge comparisons.
Results: A significant main effect from admission to discharge was found, F (1,433) = 72.90 p < 0.001, Pillai's Trace = 0.144, partial eta2 = 0.144, and power to detect = 1.00. Paired sample t-tests revealed participants in the neurorehabilitation and neurobehavioral programs realized a significant reduction in disability and disruptive behavior. Supported living programs achieved similar findings.
Conclusion: Each group demonstrated reduced disability from admission to discharge, replicating prior research. This research provided evidence that post-hospital care provides behavioral improvement to neurologically impaired individuals.
{"title":"Neurobehavioral disorders: efficacy of post-hospital specialty programs.","authors":"Gordon J Horn, Frank D Lewis, Myriam Lacerte, Mel B Glenn","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2025.2595095","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2025.2595095","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research shows that 11-34% of patients continue with agitation following acquired neurological injury after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Study objectives included 1) determining the efficacy of post hospital brain injury specialty programs, 2) determining outcomes by program type, and 3) focusing on the chronic phase of injury recovery (9-60 months post injury).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects (<i>N</i> = 437) were selected from 854 neurologically impaired adults with consecutive discharges from post-hospital networked rehabilitation programs in 24 states from 2011 to 2021. The sample included TBI, CVA, and Mixed neurological groups with at least mild behavioral impairment measured by the Mayo Portland Adaptability Inventory-4 Irritability score. The Participation Index was used for admission and discharge comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant main effect from admission to discharge was found, F (1,433) = 72.90 <i>p</i> < 0.001, Pillai's Trace = 0.144, partial eta<sup>2</sup> = 0.144, and power to detect = 1.00. Paired sample t-tests revealed participants in the neurorehabilitation and neurobehavioral programs realized a significant reduction in disability and disruptive behavior. Supported living programs achieved similar findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Each group demonstrated reduced disability from admission to discharge, replicating prior research. This research provided evidence that post-hospital care provides behavioral improvement to neurologically impaired individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145676413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-03DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2025.2591870
Quanyong Wang, Wenjing Zhou, Lei Liu, Lifang Dong, Linchun Wen
Objective: Stroke continues to be a significant global health concern, ranking as the second leading cause of death worldwide. This study aimed to investigate the potential neuroprotective effects of Litebamine (Lite), an alkaloid from Litsea cubeba, on blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity and neurological function in ischemic stroke models.
Methods: Using a MCAO/R mouse model, we assessed the effects of Lite on neurological deficits, cerebral blood flow, and infarct volume. BBB integrity was evaluated using Evans blue staining and Western blot analysis of tight junction proteins and pyroptosis-associated protein levels. Additionally, in vitro studies with bEnd.3 cells under OGD/R conditions were conducted to evaluate cell viability, matrix metalloproteinases expression, and pyroptosis-associated protein levels.
Results: Lite treatment significantly reduced neurological deficit scores and infarct volume in MCAO/R mice. Lite also restored cerebral blood flow and improved BBB integrity by upregulating ZO-1 and Occludin while downregulating MMP-2 and MMP-9. In vitro studies indicated that Lite exhibited protective effects on bEnd.3 cells under OGD/R conditions. Additionally, Lite inhibited NLRP3 inflammasome activation and pyroptosis-associated proteins (ASC, C-GSDMD, C-caspase1), reducing IL-1β and IL-18 levels both in vivo and in vitro.
Conclusion: Lite ameliorates cerebral ischemia-induced blood-brain barrier damage by inhibiting NLRP3-mediated pyroptosis in endothelial cells.
{"title":"Litebamine ameliorates cerebral ischemia-induced blood-brain barrier damage by inhibiting pyroptosis.","authors":"Quanyong Wang, Wenjing Zhou, Lei Liu, Lifang Dong, Linchun Wen","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2025.2591870","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2025.2591870","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Stroke continues to be a significant global health concern, ranking as the second leading cause of death worldwide. This study aimed to investigate the potential neuroprotective effects of Litebamine (Lite), an alkaloid from Litsea cubeba, on blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity and neurological function in ischemic stroke models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a MCAO/R mouse model, we assessed the effects of Lite on neurological deficits, cerebral blood flow, and infarct volume. BBB integrity was evaluated using Evans blue staining and Western blot analysis of tight junction proteins and pyroptosis-associated protein levels. Additionally, in vitro studies with bEnd.3 cells under OGD/R conditions were conducted to evaluate cell viability, matrix metalloproteinases expression, and pyroptosis-associated protein levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lite treatment significantly reduced neurological deficit scores and infarct volume in MCAO/R mice. Lite also restored cerebral blood flow and improved BBB integrity by upregulating ZO-1 and Occludin while downregulating MMP-2 and MMP-9. In vitro studies indicated that Lite exhibited protective effects on bEnd.3 cells under OGD/R conditions. Additionally, Lite inhibited NLRP3 inflammasome activation and pyroptosis-associated proteins (ASC, C-GSDMD, C-caspase1), reducing IL-1β and IL-18 levels both in vivo and in vitro.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lite ameliorates cerebral ischemia-induced blood-brain barrier damage by inhibiting NLRP3-mediated pyroptosis in endothelial cells.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145667065","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-09-10DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2025.2558954
Adam Mckay, Courtney Spiteri, Victoria Armao, Penny Analytis, James Stribling, Jennie Ponsford
Background: Nurses are at the forefront of managing agitation after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (msTBI), but little is known about their experiences. This study aimed to explore how nurses understand, experience, and manage agitation after msTBI in an inpatient rehabilitation setting.
Methods: A qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured interviews was used to understand the experiences of agitation after msTBI for 15 nurses (aged 20-61 years, 80% female) on an inpatient brain injury rehabilitation unit. Reflexive thematic analysis was completed on interview transcripts.
Results: Nursing experiences were characterized into four key themes relating to: 1) what nurses considered to be core features and causes of agitation; 2) factors they considered important in shaping agitation; 3) strategies they used to manage agitation; and 4) the challenges and rewards of working with patients at an early stage of recovery after TBI.
Conclusions: Nurses had a detailed understanding of agitation after msTBI and its management. Managing agitation and PTA more broadly was experienced as physically, cognitively, and emotionally draining, yet it was seen as vital for supporting recovery and was personally meaningful for nurses. A lack of formal training and organizational support was a barrier to feeling competent and confident in the role.
{"title":"The experiences of nurses working with patients who are agitated following moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: a qualitative study.","authors":"Adam Mckay, Courtney Spiteri, Victoria Armao, Penny Analytis, James Stribling, Jennie Ponsford","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2025.2558954","DOIUrl":"10.1080/02699052.2025.2558954","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nurses are at the forefront of managing agitation after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (msTBI), but little is known about their experiences. This study aimed to explore how nurses understand, experience, and manage agitation after msTBI in an inpatient rehabilitation setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured interviews was used to understand the experiences of agitation after msTBI for 15 nurses (aged 20-61 years, 80% female) on an inpatient brain injury rehabilitation unit. Reflexive thematic analysis was completed on interview transcripts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nursing experiences were characterized into four key themes relating to: 1) what nurses considered to be core features and causes of agitation; 2) factors they considered important in shaping agitation; 3) strategies they used to manage agitation; and 4) the challenges and rewards of working with patients at an early stage of recovery after TBI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nurses had a detailed understanding of agitation after msTBI and its management. Managing agitation and PTA more broadly was experienced as physically, cognitively, and emotionally draining, yet it was seen as vital for supporting recovery and was personally meaningful for nurses. A lack of formal training and organizational support was a barrier to feeling competent and confident in the role.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"1311-1320"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145028925","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-09-22DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2025.2554248
Eliyas Jeffay, Sanghamithra Ramani, Konstantine K Zakzanis
Background: A growing concern in neuropsychology is whether neuropsychological test measures (NTMs) can predict functional outcome (i.e. ecological validity). The relationship between neuropsychological tests and return to work (RTW) outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) found that the majority of tests were either weakly or completely unrelated. As such, many have opined that clinical neuropsychology should adopt new tests that relate test performance to real-world functioning, such as the Behavioural Assessment of Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS). Further investigation into the BADS sensitivity to employment status in a mTBI sample is needed.
Present study: We aimed to investigate if the BADS is better at differentiating between employment status compared to traditional pen-and-paper neuropsychological test measures in a sample of patients in the post-acute period of recovery after mTBI.
Results: Following correction of family-wise error, neither the BADS nor traditional tests could differentiate employment status in patients with mTBI who were in the post-acute period of recovery.
Conclusions: The lack of significant findings in the majority of the tests highlights the importance of other facets of a complete neuropsychological assessment. Furthermore, researchers may benefit from investigating other forms of assessment that could prove to be more ecologically valid.
{"title":"On the ecological validity of the behavioural assessment of dysexecutive syndrome measure in mild traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Eliyas Jeffay, Sanghamithra Ramani, Konstantine K Zakzanis","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2025.2554248","DOIUrl":"10.1080/02699052.2025.2554248","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A growing concern in neuropsychology is whether neuropsychological test measures (NTMs) can predict functional outcome (i.e. ecological validity). The relationship between neuropsychological tests and return to work (RTW) outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) found that the majority of tests were either weakly or completely unrelated. As such, many have opined that clinical neuropsychology should adopt new tests that relate test performance to real-world functioning, such as the Behavioural Assessment of Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS). Further investigation into the BADS sensitivity to employment status in a mTBI sample is needed.</p><p><strong>Present study: </strong>We aimed to investigate if the BADS is better at differentiating between employment status compared to traditional pen-and-paper neuropsychological test measures in a sample of patients in the post-acute period of recovery after mTBI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following correction of family-wise error, neither the BADS nor traditional tests could differentiate employment status in patients with mTBI who were in the post-acute period of recovery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The lack of significant findings in the majority of the tests highlights the importance of other facets of a complete neuropsychological assessment. Furthermore, researchers may benefit from investigating other forms of assessment that could prove to be more ecologically valid.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"1283-1294"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145123873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-08-26DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2025.2552336
Varun Mishra, Kimberly Rosenthal, Emily Hillaker, Melissa Martinez, Jennifer Bath, William Ide, Joshua Stodghill, Tonja Locklear, Justin Weppner
Objective: This study assessed the relationship between insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) level and symptom severity in adolescents with traumatic brain injury (TBI), focusing on correlation with post-injury symptom severity, depression, and anxiety.
Design: This retrospective observational study included adolescents aged 13-17 years (n = 52) with mild TBI (mTBI, n = 30) or moderate/severe TBI (msTBI, n = 22), based on best Glasgow Coma Scale score recorded in the first 24 h post-injury. Participants were 3-12 months post-TBI with available IGF-1 values and complete Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ-13), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) responses. Outcome measures were correlated with IGF-1 z-scores with Kendall's Tau analysis.
Results: RPQ-13 and GAD-7 scores were significantly higher in msTBI (p = 0.0472 and p = 0.0085, respectively). IGF-1 z-scores negatively correlated with RPQ-13 scores in mTBI (tau = -0.65, p < 0.0001) and msTBI (tau = -0.85, p < 0.0001), and with GAD-7 scores in mTBI (tau = -0.30, p = 0.0302) and msTBI (tau = -0.39, p = 0.0144). Only msTBI demonstrated a significant negative correlation between IGF-1 z-score and PHQ-9 scores (tau = -0.82, p < 0.0001).
Conclusions: Adolescents with msTBI experienced greater post-injury symptom severity and anxiety than those with mTBI. Low IGF-1 levels correlated with greater post-injury symptom severity, anxiety, and depression (msTBI only), supporting IGF-1 as a potential biomarker in adolescent TBI.
目的:探讨青少年创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者胰岛素样生长因子1 (IGF-1)水平与症状严重程度的关系,重点探讨其与伤后症状严重程度、抑郁、焦虑的关系。设计:这项回顾性观察性研究包括13-17岁的青少年(n = 52),轻度TBI (mTBI, n = 30)或中/重度TBI (msTBI, n = 22),基于损伤后24小时记录的最佳格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分。参与者在脑外伤后3-12个月具有可用的IGF-1值,并完成了Rivermead脑震荡后症状问卷(RPQ-13)、广泛性焦虑障碍-7 (GAD-7)和患者健康问卷-9 (PHQ-9)的回答。通过Kendall's Tau分析,结果测量与IGF-1 z分数相关。结果:msTBI患者RPQ-13、GAD-7评分显著高于对照组(p = 0.0472、p = 0.0085)。mTBI (tau = -0.65, p p = 0.0302)和msTBI (tau = -0.39, p = 0.0144)中IGF-1 z-得分与RPQ-13得分呈负相关。只有msTBI的IGF-1 z-score与PHQ-9评分呈显著负相关(tau = -0.82, p)。结论:msTBI的青少年损伤后症状严重程度和焦虑程度高于mTBI。低IGF-1水平与更严重的损伤后症状严重程度、焦虑和抑郁(仅限msTBI)相关,支持IGF-1作为青少年TBI的潜在生物标志物。
{"title":"IGF-1 as a biomarker for symptom severity in adolescents with traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Varun Mishra, Kimberly Rosenthal, Emily Hillaker, Melissa Martinez, Jennifer Bath, William Ide, Joshua Stodghill, Tonja Locklear, Justin Weppner","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2025.2552336","DOIUrl":"10.1080/02699052.2025.2552336","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study assessed the relationship between insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) level and symptom severity in adolescents with traumatic brain injury (TBI), focusing on correlation with post-injury symptom severity, depression, and anxiety.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This retrospective observational study included adolescents aged 13-17 years (<i>n</i> = 52) with mild TBI (mTBI, <i>n</i> = 30) or moderate/severe TBI (msTBI, <i>n</i> = 22), based on best Glasgow Coma Scale score recorded in the first 24 h post-injury. Participants were 3-12 months post-TBI with available IGF-1 values and complete Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ-13), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) responses. Outcome measures were correlated with IGF-1 z-scores with Kendall's Tau analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RPQ-13 and GAD-7 scores were significantly higher in msTBI (<i>p</i> = 0.0472 and <i>p</i> = 0.0085, respectively). IGF-1 z-scores negatively correlated with RPQ-13 scores in mTBI (tau = -0.65, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and msTBI (tau = -0.85, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), and with GAD-7 scores in mTBI (tau = -0.30, <i>p</i> = 0.0302) and msTBI (tau = -0.39, <i>p</i> = 0.0144). Only msTBI demonstrated a significant negative correlation between IGF-1 z-score and PHQ-9 scores (tau = -0.82, <i>p</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adolescents with msTBI experienced greater post-injury symptom severity and anxiety than those with mTBI. Low IGF-1 levels correlated with greater post-injury symptom severity, anxiety, and depression (msTBI only), supporting IGF-1 as a potential biomarker in adolescent TBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"1268-1273"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144942560","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-10-05DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2025.2561200
April Smith, Dawn Neumann, Devan Parrott
Objectives: To compare interoceptive sensibility in participants with and without traumatic brain injury (TBI+ and TBI-, respectively); and explore the relations of interoceptive sensibility domains with alexithymia, psychological distress, and post-traumatic stress outcomes, as well as whether relations were stronger in TBI+ versus TBI- group.
Method: Cross-sectional survey study conducted in adults with TBI+ and TBI-. The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA-2) evaluated eight dimensions of interoceptive sensibility, and validated scales assessed alexithymia, psychological distress.
Results: Relative to TBI-, participants with TBI scored lower on three MAIA subscales - Not Distracting, Self-Regulation, and Body Listening. Facets of interoceptive sensibility were associated with alexithymia, psychological distress, and posttraumatic stress symptoms. For two subscales (Attention Regulation, Not Worrying), lower interoceptive sensibility was related to higher psychological symptoms (alexithymia and posttraumatic stress symptoms, respectively) in the TBI+ group relative to the TBI- group.
Conclusion: Individuals with TBI demonstrated lower interoceptive sensibility across multiple domains compared to those without TBI. Lower Attention Regulation and Not Worrying were more strongly associated with alexithymia and posttraumatic stress symptoms, respectively, in those with TBI. Interventions targeting interoceptive sensibility - such as mindfulness-based or somatic-focused therapies - may be beneficial for individuals with TBI to improve psychological well-being.
{"title":"Interoceptive awareness and alexithymia in people with and without traumatic brain injury.","authors":"April Smith, Dawn Neumann, Devan Parrott","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2025.2561200","DOIUrl":"10.1080/02699052.2025.2561200","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare interoceptive sensibility in participants with and without traumatic brain injury (TBI+ and TBI-, respectively); and explore the relations of interoceptive sensibility domains with alexithymia, psychological distress, and post-traumatic stress outcomes, as well as whether relations were stronger in TBI+ versus TBI- group.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Cross-sectional survey study conducted in adults with TBI+ and TBI-. The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA-2) evaluated eight dimensions of interoceptive sensibility, and validated scales assessed alexithymia, psychological distress.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Relative to TBI-, participants with TBI scored lower on three MAIA subscales - Not Distracting, Self-Regulation, and Body Listening. Facets of interoceptive sensibility were associated with alexithymia, psychological distress, and posttraumatic stress symptoms. For two subscales (Attention Regulation, Not Worrying), lower interoceptive sensibility was related to higher psychological symptoms (alexithymia and posttraumatic stress symptoms, respectively) in the TBI+ group relative to the TBI- group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individuals with TBI demonstrated lower interoceptive sensibility across multiple domains compared to those without TBI. Lower Attention Regulation and Not Worrying were more strongly associated with alexithymia and posttraumatic stress symptoms, respectively, in those with TBI. Interventions targeting interoceptive sensibility - such as mindfulness-based or somatic-focused therapies - may be beneficial for individuals with TBI to improve psychological well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"1357-1365"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145231467","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-09-21DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2025.2551162
Erin David Bigler, Steven Allder, Benjamin T Dunkley, Jeff Victoroff
Primary objective: This is Part I of a four-part review that examines traditional neuropsychological assessment methods and techniques in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Absence of neuropsychological findings has been used to argue no residual neuropathological effects from mTBI. However, given the current potential that advanced multimodality and quantitative neuroimaging can now demonstrate about underlying neurobiology of brain-behavior relations, this review shows that traditional neuropsychological test as standalone findings cannot directly address the underlying complexities of detecting mTBI neuropathology.
Research design: This is a review.
Methods and procedures: Traditional neuropsychological tests, their development, methods and conclusions over the past 50+ years are the centerpiece of this review juxtaposed with 21st century advanced neuroimaging and improved understanding of the neurobiology and potential neuropathology of mTBI.
Main outcome and results: Traditional neuropsychological methods were never developed for detecting subtle changes in neurocognitive or neurobehavioral functioning as a standalone procedure and likewise, never designed to address the multifaceted issues related to symptom burden from having sustained a mTBI, especially after three-months post-injury. Advanced neuroimaging methods have the potential to inform the clinician and researcher about potential neurobiological factors to best understand relevant neuropsychological outcome factors associated with mTBI outcome. A model is presented that helps explain how adaptation and accommodation may occur after mTBI within the context of 'normal' traditional neuropsychological test findings.
Conclusions: The limitations of traditional neuropsychological testing in mTBI outlined within the context of how advanced neuroimaging improves our understanding of mTBI outcome.
{"title":"What traditional neuropsychological assessment got wrong about mild traumatic brain injury. I: historical perspective, contemporary neuroimaging overview and neuropathology update.","authors":"Erin David Bigler, Steven Allder, Benjamin T Dunkley, Jeff Victoroff","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2025.2551162","DOIUrl":"10.1080/02699052.2025.2551162","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Primary objective: </strong>This is Part I of a four-part review that examines traditional neuropsychological assessment methods and techniques in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Absence of neuropsychological findings has been used to argue no residual neuropathological effects from mTBI. However, given the current potential that advanced multimodality and quantitative neuroimaging can now demonstrate about underlying neurobiology of brain-behavior relations, this review shows that traditional neuropsychological test as standalone findings cannot directly address the underlying complexities of detecting mTBI neuropathology.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>This is a review.</p><p><strong>Methods and procedures: </strong>Traditional neuropsychological tests, their development, methods and conclusions over the past 50+ years are the centerpiece of this review juxtaposed with 21<sup>st</sup> century advanced neuroimaging and improved understanding of the neurobiology and potential neuropathology of mTBI.</p><p><strong>Main outcome and results: </strong>Traditional neuropsychological methods were never developed for detecting subtle changes in neurocognitive or neurobehavioral functioning as a standalone procedure and likewise, never designed to address the multifaceted issues related to symptom burden from having sustained a mTBI, especially after three-months post-injury. Advanced neuroimaging methods have the potential to inform the clinician and researcher about potential neurobiological factors to best understand relevant neuropsychological outcome factors associated with mTBI outcome. A model is presented that helps explain how adaptation and accommodation may occur after mTBI within the context of 'normal' traditional neuropsychological test findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The limitations of traditional neuropsychological testing in mTBI outlined within the context of how advanced neuroimaging improves our understanding of mTBI outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"1161-1183"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145111676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Memantine is thought to function as a neuroprotective agent because of its impact on the progression of various neurodegenerative diseases. This study examines memantine's neuroprotective effects in reducing complications resulting from brain injuries.
Methods: The keywords were searched in the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Human studies were excluded. SYRCLE's RoB was utilized to assess the quality of the studies.
Results: Of 1543 articles reviewed up to November 20, 2024, 51 met the established inclusion and exclusion criteria. The results indicated a strong association between memantine administration and: 1) decreased infarct size, reduced number of apoptotic cells, less brain edema, lower oxidative stress index, and diminished inflammatory responses, alongside improved neurobehavioral outcomes in ischemic stroke models; 2) less hematoma expansion, reduced brain edema and damage, decreased inflammation, and notable enhancement in neurobehavioral function and survival in hemorrhagic stroke models, coupled with the prevention of delayed cerebral vasospasm in subarachnoid hemorrhage cases; and 3) diminished brain injury, reduced infarct volume, less oxidative stress, and marked improvement in neurofunctional recovery in traumatic brain injury models.
Conclusions: Memantine's potential neuroprotective properties could improve neurofunctional outcomes for patients with acute brain injuries.
背景:美金刚被认为是一种神经保护剂,因为它对各种神经退行性疾病的进展有影响。本研究探讨美金刚在减少脑损伤并发症方面的神经保护作用。方法:检索PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science数据库中的关键词。排除了人体研究。使用sycle的RoB来评估研究的质量。结果:截至2024年11月20日,在1543篇文献中,51篇符合纳入和排除标准。结果表明,美金刚给药与:1)缺血性卒中模型中梗死面积减小、凋亡细胞数量减少、脑水肿减轻、氧化应激指数降低、炎症反应减轻以及神经行为预后改善之间存在密切关联;2)出血性脑卒中模型血肿扩张少,脑水肿和脑损伤减轻,炎症减轻,神经行为功能和生存率显著提高,蛛网膜下腔出血患者迟发性脑血管痉挛的预防作用显著;3)创伤性脑损伤模型脑损伤减轻,梗死体积减小,氧化应激减轻,神经功能恢复明显改善。结论:美金刚的潜在神经保护特性可以改善急性脑损伤患者的神经功能预后。
{"title":"Can the neuroprotective effects of memantine prevent the complications of brain injuries? A systematic review of animal models.","authors":"Mojtaba Mojtahedzadeh, Rezvan Hassanpour, Omid Moradi Moghaddam, Reza Bahman, Ehsan Emami, Elham Pourheidar","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2025.2561785","DOIUrl":"10.1080/02699052.2025.2561785","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Memantine is thought to function as a neuroprotective agent because of its impact on the progression of various neurodegenerative diseases. This study examines memantine's neuroprotective effects in reducing complications resulting from brain injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The keywords were searched in the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Human studies were excluded. SYRCLE's RoB was utilized to assess the quality of the studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1543 articles reviewed up to November 20, 2024, 51 met the established inclusion and exclusion criteria. The results indicated a strong association between memantine administration and: 1) decreased infarct size, reduced number of apoptotic cells, less brain edema, lower oxidative stress index, and diminished inflammatory responses, alongside improved neurobehavioral outcomes in ischemic stroke models; 2) less hematoma expansion, reduced brain edema and damage, decreased inflammation, and notable enhancement in neurobehavioral function and survival in hemorrhagic stroke models, coupled with the prevention of delayed cerebral vasospasm in subarachnoid hemorrhage cases; and 3) diminished brain injury, reduced infarct volume, less oxidative stress, and marked improvement in neurofunctional recovery in traumatic brain injury models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Memantine's potential neuroprotective properties could improve neurofunctional outcomes for patients with acute brain injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"1210-1222"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145190929","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}