Accuracy of a Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitor in Pediatric Diabetic Ketoacidosis Admissions.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes technology & therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-20 DOI:10.1089/dia.2023.0542
Lauren A Waterman, Laura Pyle, Gregory P Forlenza, Lindsey Towers, Angela J Karami, Emily Jost, Cari Berget, R Paul Wadwa, Erin C Cobry
{"title":"Accuracy of a Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitor in Pediatric Diabetic Ketoacidosis Admissions.","authors":"Lauren A Waterman, Laura Pyle, Gregory P Forlenza, Lindsey Towers, Angela J Karami, Emily Jost, Cari Berget, R Paul Wadwa, Erin C Cobry","doi":"10.1089/dia.2023.0542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices are integral in the outpatient care of people with type 1 diabetes, although they lack inpatient labeling. Food and Drug Administration began allowing inpatient use during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, with some accuracy data now available, primarily from adult hospitals. Pediatric inpatient data remain limited, particularly during diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) admissions and for patients receiving intravenous (IV) insulin. <b><i>Design and Methods:</i></b> This retrospective chart review compared point-of-care glucose values to personal Dexcom G6 sensor data during pediatric hospitalizations. Accuracy was assessed using mean absolute relative difference (MARD), Clarke Error Grids, and the percentage of values within 15/20/30% if glucose value >100 mg/dL and 15/20/30 mg/dL if glucose value ≤100 mg/dL. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Matched paired glucose values (<i>N</i> = 612) from 36 patients (median age 14 years, 58.3% non-Hispanic White, 47.2% male) and 42 inpatient encounters were included in this subanalysis of DKA admissions. The MARDs for DKA and non-DKA admissions (<i>N</i> = 503) were 11.8% and 11.7%, with 97.6% and 98.6% of pairs falling within A and B zones of the Clarke Error Grid, respectively. Severe DKA admissions (pH <7.15 and/or bicarbonate <5 mmol/L) had a MARD of 8.9% compared to 14.3% for nonsevere DKA admissions. The MARD during administration of IV insulin (<i>N</i> = 266) was 13.4%. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> CGM accuracy is similar between DKA and non-DKA admissions and is maintained in severe DKA and during IV insulin administration, suggesting potential usability in pediatric hospitalizations. Further study on the feasibility of implementation of CGM in the hospital is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2023.0542","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices are integral in the outpatient care of people with type 1 diabetes, although they lack inpatient labeling. Food and Drug Administration began allowing inpatient use during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, with some accuracy data now available, primarily from adult hospitals. Pediatric inpatient data remain limited, particularly during diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) admissions and for patients receiving intravenous (IV) insulin. Design and Methods: This retrospective chart review compared point-of-care glucose values to personal Dexcom G6 sensor data during pediatric hospitalizations. Accuracy was assessed using mean absolute relative difference (MARD), Clarke Error Grids, and the percentage of values within 15/20/30% if glucose value >100 mg/dL and 15/20/30 mg/dL if glucose value ≤100 mg/dL. Results: Matched paired glucose values (N = 612) from 36 patients (median age 14 years, 58.3% non-Hispanic White, 47.2% male) and 42 inpatient encounters were included in this subanalysis of DKA admissions. The MARDs for DKA and non-DKA admissions (N = 503) were 11.8% and 11.7%, with 97.6% and 98.6% of pairs falling within A and B zones of the Clarke Error Grid, respectively. Severe DKA admissions (pH <7.15 and/or bicarbonate <5 mmol/L) had a MARD of 8.9% compared to 14.3% for nonsevere DKA admissions. The MARD during administration of IV insulin (N = 266) was 13.4%. Conclusions: CGM accuracy is similar between DKA and non-DKA admissions and is maintained in severe DKA and during IV insulin administration, suggesting potential usability in pediatric hospitalizations. Further study on the feasibility of implementation of CGM in the hospital is needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实时连续血糖监测仪在小儿糖尿病酮症酸中毒入院治疗中的准确性。
目的 连续血糖监测 (CGM) 设备是 1 型糖尿病 (T1D) 患者门诊治疗中不可或缺的设备,但它们没有住院患者标签。FDA 在 COVID-19 大流行期间开始允许在住院患者中使用,目前已有一些准确性数据,主要来自成人医院。儿科住院患者的数据仍然有限,尤其是在 DKA 住院期间和接受静脉注射胰岛素的患者。设计与方法 本回顾性病历审查比较了儿科住院期间的护理点 (POC) 血糖值和个人 Dexcom G6 传感器数据。使用平均绝对相对差值 (MARD)、克拉克误差格栅以及血糖值 >100mg/dL 时 15/20/30% 和血糖值 ≤100mg/dL 时 15/20/30mg/dL 的百分比来评估准确性。结果 36 名患者(中位年龄 14 岁,58.3% 为非西班牙裔白人,47.2% 为男性)和 42 次住院病例的配对血糖值(N=612)被纳入本次 DKA 入院病例子分析。DKA 和非 DKA 入院患者(N=503)的 MARDs 分别为 11.8% 和 11.7%,其中分别有 97.6% 和 98.6% 的患者属于克拉克误差网格的 A 区和 B 区。严重 DKA 患者(pH 值< 7.15 和/或碳酸氢盐< 5 mmol/L)的 MARD 为 8.9%,而非严重 DKA 患者的 MARD 为 14.3%。静脉注射胰岛素期间的 MARD(N=266)为 13.4%。结论 CGM 的准确性在 DKA 和非 DKA 住院患者中相似,在重度 DKA 和静脉注射胰岛素期间仍能保持准确性,这表明 CGM 在儿科住院患者中具有潜在的可用性。需要进一步研究在医院实施 CGM 的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes technology & therapeutics
Diabetes technology & therapeutics 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
14.80%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.
期刊最新文献
Safety of Options to "Boost" (Enhancing Insulin Infusion Rates) and "Ease-Off" (Reducing Insulin Infusion Rates) in CamAPS FX Hybrid Closed-Loop System: A Real-World Analysis. Clinical Utility of Serum C-peptide Concentration for Hospitalized Patients with Hyperglycemia. An Automated Insulin Delivery System with Automatic Meal Bolus Based on a Hand-Gesturing Algorithm. Noninvasive Real-Time Glucose Monitoring Is in the Near Future. Accuracy of a Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitor in Pediatric Diabetic Ketoacidosis Admissions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1