Compendium of dyadic intervention techniques (DITs) to change health behaviours: a systematic review.

IF 6.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Health Psychology Review Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-04 DOI:10.1080/17437199.2024.2307534
Sally Di Maio, Karoline Villinger, Nina Knoll, Urte Scholz, Gertraud Stadler, Caterina Gawrilow, Corina Berli
{"title":"Compendium of dyadic intervention techniques (DITs) to change health behaviours: a systematic review.","authors":"Sally Di Maio, Karoline Villinger, Nina Knoll, Urte Scholz, Gertraud Stadler, Caterina Gawrilow, Corina Berli","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2024.2307534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dyadic interventions for health behaviour change involving the romantic partner are promising. However, it often remains unclear how exactly the partner is involved in dyadic interventions. We propose a novel compendium of dyadic intervention techniques (DITs) that facilitates systematic description of dyadic interventions in terms of who performs what for whom during intervention delivery and subsequent implementation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to systematically characterise dyadic interventions along their degree of partner involvement and to provide a comprehensive list of DITs used in dyadic interventions with romantic partners.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically reviewed dyadic health behaviour change interventions with controlled designs. We included 165 studies describing 122 distinct dyadic interventions with romantic partners. Interventions were classified along their degree of partner involvement, 160 DITs were extracted, and their frequencies of use counted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of interventions (<i>n </i>= 90, 74%) explicitly instructed partners to interact. Half of the DITs were performed jointly by the couple and also targeted the couple. Mostly, couples were instructed to jointly practice communication skills and to jointly perform problem solving for the couple.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The present review contributes to the development of a shared and systematic way of describing dyadic interventions to facilitate cumulation of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2024.2307534","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dyadic interventions for health behaviour change involving the romantic partner are promising. However, it often remains unclear how exactly the partner is involved in dyadic interventions. We propose a novel compendium of dyadic intervention techniques (DITs) that facilitates systematic description of dyadic interventions in terms of who performs what for whom during intervention delivery and subsequent implementation.

Objective: We aimed to systematically characterise dyadic interventions along their degree of partner involvement and to provide a comprehensive list of DITs used in dyadic interventions with romantic partners.

Methods: We systematically reviewed dyadic health behaviour change interventions with controlled designs. We included 165 studies describing 122 distinct dyadic interventions with romantic partners. Interventions were classified along their degree of partner involvement, 160 DITs were extracted, and their frequencies of use counted.

Results: The majority of interventions (n = 90, 74%) explicitly instructed partners to interact. Half of the DITs were performed jointly by the couple and also targeted the couple. Mostly, couples were instructed to jointly practice communication skills and to jointly perform problem solving for the couple.

Discussion: The present review contributes to the development of a shared and systematic way of describing dyadic interventions to facilitate cumulation of evidence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改变健康行为的干群干预技术(DIT)汇编:系统综述。
背景:有恋爱伴侣参与的改变健康行为的双向干预很有前景。然而,人们往往仍不清楚伴侣究竟是如何参与伴侣干预的。我们提出了一个新颖的伴侣干预技术(DITs)汇编,该汇编有助于系统地描述伴侣干预,即在干预实施和后续实施过程中,谁为谁做什么:我们的目的是根据伴侣参与的程度系统地描述伴侣干预的特点,并提供一份在与恋爱伴侣进行伴侣干预时使用的 DIT 的综合清单:我们系统回顾了采用对照设计的伴侣健康行为改变干预措施。我们纳入了 165 项研究,这些研究描述了 122 种不同的恋爱伴侣双向干预措施。根据伴侣的参与程度对干预措施进行了分类,提取了 160 项 DIT,并统计了其使用频率:大多数干预措施(n = 90,74%)都明确指示伴侣进行互动。有一半的 DIT 是由夫妻共同完成的,也是针对夫妻的。大多数情况下,夫妻被指导共同练习沟通技巧,并共同为夫妻解决问题:本综述有助于发展一种共同的、系统的方法来描述夫妻干预,以促进证据的积累。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Psychology Review
Health Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The publication of Health Psychology Review (HPR) marks a significant milestone in the field of health psychology, as it is the first review journal dedicated to this important and rapidly growing discipline. Edited by a highly respected team, HPR provides a critical platform for the review, development of theories, and conceptual advancements in health psychology. This prestigious international forum not only contributes to the progress of health psychology but also fosters its connection with the broader field of psychology and other related academic and professional domains. With its vital insights, HPR is a must-read for those involved in the study, teaching, and practice of health psychology, behavioral medicine, and related areas.
期刊最新文献
Components of multiple health behaviour change interventions for patients with chronic conditions: a systematic review and meta-regression of randomized trials. Identifying the psychosocial barriers and facilitators associated with the uptake of genetic services for hereditary cancer syndromes: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Protection motivation theory and health behaviour: conceptual review, discussion of limitations, and recommendations for best practice and future research. Inhibitory control training to reduce appetitive behaviour: a meta-analytic investigation of effectiveness, potential moderators, and underlying mechanisms of change. Psychosocial determinants of alternative protein choices: a meta-review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1