White blood cells scattergram as a valuable tool for COVID-19 screening: A multicentric study

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY International Journal of Laboratory Hematology Pub Date : 2024-03-04 DOI:10.1111/ijlh.14257
Jennifer Osman, Cécile Gonnin, Jérome Lambert, Céline Behier, Nicolas Chapuis, Simon Chevalier, Jérôme Debus, Anne Delaval, Maxime Depoorter, Cécile Dumas, Amély Dumesges, Pascale Dussert, Corinne Ferrero Vacher, Frédérique Dubois-Galopin, Delphine Gerard, Pauline Gravière Bollotte, Geoffroy Guignedoux, Caroline Mayeur-Rousse, Delphine Mercier-Bataille, Emily Ronez, Catherine Trichet, Margaux Wiber, Victoria Raggueneau
{"title":"White blood cells scattergram as a valuable tool for COVID-19 screening: A multicentric study","authors":"Jennifer Osman,&nbsp;Cécile Gonnin,&nbsp;Jérome Lambert,&nbsp;Céline Behier,&nbsp;Nicolas Chapuis,&nbsp;Simon Chevalier,&nbsp;Jérôme Debus,&nbsp;Anne Delaval,&nbsp;Maxime Depoorter,&nbsp;Cécile Dumas,&nbsp;Amély Dumesges,&nbsp;Pascale Dussert,&nbsp;Corinne Ferrero Vacher,&nbsp;Frédérique Dubois-Galopin,&nbsp;Delphine Gerard,&nbsp;Pauline Gravière Bollotte,&nbsp;Geoffroy Guignedoux,&nbsp;Caroline Mayeur-Rousse,&nbsp;Delphine Mercier-Bataille,&nbsp;Emily Ronez,&nbsp;Catherine Trichet,&nbsp;Margaux Wiber,&nbsp;Victoria Raggueneau","doi":"10.1111/ijlh.14257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>New tools have been developed to distinguish the COVID-19 diagnosis from other viral infections presenting similar symptomatology and mitigate the lack of sensitivity of molecular testing. We previously identified a specific “sandglass” aspect on the white blood cells (WBC) scattergram of COVID-19 patients, as a highly reliable COVID-19 screening test (sensitivity: 85.9%, specificity: 83.5% and positive predictive value: 94.3%). We then decided to validate our previous data in a multicentric study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective study involved 817 patients with flu-like illness, among 20 centers, using the same CBC instrument (XN analyzer, SYSMEX, Japan). After training, one specialist per center independently evaluated, under the same conditions, the presence of the “sandglass” aspect of the WDF scattergram, likely representing plasmacytoid lymphocytes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, this approach showed sensitivity: 59.0%, specificity: 72.9% and positive predictive value: 77.7%. Sensitivity improved with subgroup analysis, including in patients with lymphopenia (65.2%), patients presenting symptoms for more than 5 days (72.3%) and in patients with ARDS (70.1%). COVID-19 patients with larger plasmacytoid lymphocyte cluster (&gt;15 cells) more often have severe outcomes (70% vs. 15% in the control group).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings confirm that the WBC scattergram analysis could be added to a diagnostic algorithm for screening and quickly categorizing symptomatic patients as either COVID-19 probable or improbable, especially during COVID-19 resurgence and overlapping with future influenza epidemics. The observed large size of the plasmacytoid lymphocytes cluster appear<b>s</b> to be a hallmark of COVID-19 patients and was indicative of a severe outcome. Furthers studies are ongoing to evaluate the value of the new hematological parameters in combination with WDF analysis.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14120,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology","volume":"46 4","pages":"613-619"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijlh.14257","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

New tools have been developed to distinguish the COVID-19 diagnosis from other viral infections presenting similar symptomatology and mitigate the lack of sensitivity of molecular testing. We previously identified a specific “sandglass” aspect on the white blood cells (WBC) scattergram of COVID-19 patients, as a highly reliable COVID-19 screening test (sensitivity: 85.9%, specificity: 83.5% and positive predictive value: 94.3%). We then decided to validate our previous data in a multicentric study.

Methods

This retrospective study involved 817 patients with flu-like illness, among 20 centers, using the same CBC instrument (XN analyzer, SYSMEX, Japan). After training, one specialist per center independently evaluated, under the same conditions, the presence of the “sandglass” aspect of the WDF scattergram, likely representing plasmacytoid lymphocytes.

Results

Overall, this approach showed sensitivity: 59.0%, specificity: 72.9% and positive predictive value: 77.7%. Sensitivity improved with subgroup analysis, including in patients with lymphopenia (65.2%), patients presenting symptoms for more than 5 days (72.3%) and in patients with ARDS (70.1%). COVID-19 patients with larger plasmacytoid lymphocyte cluster (>15 cells) more often have severe outcomes (70% vs. 15% in the control group).

Conclusion

Our findings confirm that the WBC scattergram analysis could be added to a diagnostic algorithm for screening and quickly categorizing symptomatic patients as either COVID-19 probable or improbable, especially during COVID-19 resurgence and overlapping with future influenza epidemics. The observed large size of the plasmacytoid lymphocytes cluster appears to be a hallmark of COVID-19 patients and was indicative of a severe outcome. Furthers studies are ongoing to evaluate the value of the new hematological parameters in combination with WDF analysis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
白细胞散点图作为 COVID-19 筛查的重要工具:一项多中心研究
导言:为了将 COVID-19 诊断与症状相似的其他病毒感染区分开来,并缓解分子检测灵敏度不足的问题,我们开发了新的工具。我们曾发现,COVID-19 患者白细胞散点图上的特异性 "沙镜 "是一种高度可靠的 COVID-19 筛查测试(灵敏度:85.9%,特异性:83.5%,阳性预测值:94.3%)。因此,我们决定在一项多中心研究中验证我们之前的数据:这项回顾性研究涉及 20 个中心的 817 名流感样疾病患者,使用相同的 CBC 仪器(XN 分析仪,日本 SYSMEX 公司)。经过培训后,每个中心由一名专家在相同的条件下独立评估 WDF 散点图中是否存在 "沙镜"(可能代表浆细胞淋巴细胞):总体而言,该方法的灵敏度为 59.0%,特异性为 72.9%,阳性预测值为 77.7%。通过亚组分析,包括淋巴细胞减少症患者(65.2%)、出现症状超过 5 天的患者(72.3%)和 ARDS 患者(70.1%)的灵敏度有所提高。COVID-19患者中浆细胞淋巴细胞群较大(>15个细胞)的患者更容易出现严重后果(70%对对照组的15%):我们的研究结果证实,白细胞散点图分析可添加到诊断算法中,用于筛查和快速将有症状的患者归类为可能感染 COVID-19 或不可能感染 COVID-19 的患者,尤其是在 COVID-19 复发期间以及与未来流感流行重叠期间。观察到的大体积浆细胞淋巴细胞簇似乎是 COVID-19 患者的特征,并预示着严重后果。目前正在进行进一步研究,以评估新血液学参数与 WDF 分析相结合的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
211
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Laboratory Hematology provides a forum for the communication of new developments, research topics and the practice of laboratory haematology. The journal publishes invited reviews, full length original articles, and correspondence. The International Journal of Laboratory Hematology is the official journal of the International Society for Laboratory Hematology, which addresses the following sub-disciplines: cellular analysis, flow cytometry, haemostasis and thrombosis, molecular diagnostics, haematology informatics, haemoglobinopathies, point of care testing, standards and guidelines. The journal was launched in 2006 as the successor to Clinical and Laboratory Hematology, which was first published in 1979. An active and positive editorial policy ensures that work of a high scientific standard is reported, in order to bridge the gap between practical and academic aspects of laboratory haematology.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Supplement Article Issue Information Cover Image Increased Platelet Size and Elevated P2Y12 mRNA Expression Levels in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1