International constitutional advising: Introducing a new dataset

Hanna Lerner, David Futscher Pereira, Nina Schlager
{"title":"International constitutional advising: Introducing a new dataset","authors":"Hanna Lerner, David Futscher Pereira, Nina Schlager","doi":"10.1007/s11558-024-09530-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The article presents the first systematic comparative study on the growing involvement of international organizations in national constitution making around the world. Over the past three decades, the emerging field of international constitutional advising has undergone an intense process of institutionalization and professionalization, mirroring the increasing role constitution making is playing in both national and international politics. Despite the vast scope of the phenomenon, the involvement of foreign constitutional advisors in domestic constitution-drafting or constitutional reforms has received little scholarly attention. This article takes the first steps towards addressing this lacuna empirically, by introducing a new dataset on 46 international organizations involved in 730 constitutional advising projects in 145 countries between 1989 and 2017. We classified the organizations based on their type, their headquarters’ location, the countries they target, the kind of advising activities they perform and the level of directness of the advising intervention. While generally, we find a significant correlation between more direct constitutional advising activities and larger relative changes in the quality of democracy and larger numbers of constitutional systems in a country, the article suggests avenues for more nuanced research to better understand constitutional advising’s impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":75182,"journal":{"name":"The review of international organizations","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The review of international organizations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-024-09530-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article presents the first systematic comparative study on the growing involvement of international organizations in national constitution making around the world. Over the past three decades, the emerging field of international constitutional advising has undergone an intense process of institutionalization and professionalization, mirroring the increasing role constitution making is playing in both national and international politics. Despite the vast scope of the phenomenon, the involvement of foreign constitutional advisors in domestic constitution-drafting or constitutional reforms has received little scholarly attention. This article takes the first steps towards addressing this lacuna empirically, by introducing a new dataset on 46 international organizations involved in 730 constitutional advising projects in 145 countries between 1989 and 2017. We classified the organizations based on their type, their headquarters’ location, the countries they target, the kind of advising activities they perform and the level of directness of the advising intervention. While generally, we find a significant correlation between more direct constitutional advising activities and larger relative changes in the quality of democracy and larger numbers of constitutional systems in a country, the article suggests avenues for more nuanced research to better understand constitutional advising’s impact.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际宪法咨询:引入新的数据集
文章首次对国际组织越来越多地参与世界各地的国家宪法制定进行了系统的比较研究。在过去的三十年里,国际宪法顾问这一新兴领域经历了紧张的制度化和专业化进程,反映出制宪在国家和国际政治中发挥着越来越重要的作用。尽管这一现象范围广泛,但外国宪法顾问对国内宪法起草或宪法改革的参与却很少受到学术界的关注。本文引入了一个新的数据集,涉及 1989 年至 2017 年间参与 145 个国家 730 个宪法咨询项目的 46 个国际组织,从而迈出了实证解决这一空白的第一步。我们根据组织类型、总部所在地、目标国家、咨询活动类型以及咨询干预的直接程度对组织进行了分类。总体而言,我们发现更直接的宪法咨询活动与一个国家民主质量的较大相对变化和宪政制度的较多数量之间存在明显的相关性,但文章提出了进行更细致研究的途径,以更好地了解宪法咨询的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The brothers Karamazov go abroad: A dataset of Russian leaders’ foreign visits Global value chains and the design of trade agreements Locking in democracy? Transitions, returning autocratic elites, and human rights treaty commitment Power by Proxy: Participation as a Resource in Global Governance Less is more: Property rights and dictators’ demand for foreign direct investment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1