How still? Parent–infant interaction during the still-face and later infant attachment

IF 2.8 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Infant and Child Development Pub Date : 2024-03-03 DOI:10.1002/icd.2492
Yeojin A. Ahn, Katherine Martin, Emily B. Prince, Sy-Miin Chow, Jeffrey F. Cohn, Jue Wang, Elizabeth A. Simpson, Daniel S. Messinger
{"title":"How still? Parent–infant interaction during the still-face and later infant attachment","authors":"Yeojin A. Ahn,&nbsp;Katherine Martin,&nbsp;Emily B. Prince,&nbsp;Sy-Miin Chow,&nbsp;Jeffrey F. Cohn,&nbsp;Jue Wang,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Simpson,&nbsp;Daniel S. Messinger","doi":"10.1002/icd.2492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the still-face episode of the Face-to-Face/Still-Face (FFSF), parents are asked to become unresponsive. However, infant–parent interaction may be irrepressible, and there is some evidence that interaction during the still-face is associated with attachment outcome. To explore these questions, we independently coded the continuous affective valence (negative to positive) of seventy-three 6-month-old infants (45 males; 36 Hispanic/Latinx; 38 White, 3 Black/African-American, 2 Asian, 30 multiracial) and their parents (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 36 years; 5 males; 30 Hispanic/Latinx; 65 White, 3 Black/African-American, 2 Asian, 2 unknown) during the FFSF and assessed attachment at 15 months with the Strange Situation Procedure (<i>n</i> = 66). There was a mean positive correlation between moment-to-moment parent and infant affective valence, indicating synchronous affective interaction during the still-face (<i>d</i> = 0.63). Higher levels of affect interaction during the still-face episode were detected in infants later classified as disorganised compared to securely attached (<i>d</i> = 0.97). Findings underscore the importance of testing for still-face interaction and suggest that this interaction may be an unappreciated predictor of infant attachment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47820,"journal":{"name":"Infant and Child Development","volume":"33 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infant and Child Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/icd.2492","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the still-face episode of the Face-to-Face/Still-Face (FFSF), parents are asked to become unresponsive. However, infant–parent interaction may be irrepressible, and there is some evidence that interaction during the still-face is associated with attachment outcome. To explore these questions, we independently coded the continuous affective valence (negative to positive) of seventy-three 6-month-old infants (45 males; 36 Hispanic/Latinx; 38 White, 3 Black/African-American, 2 Asian, 30 multiracial) and their parents (Mage = 36 years; 5 males; 30 Hispanic/Latinx; 65 White, 3 Black/African-American, 2 Asian, 2 unknown) during the FFSF and assessed attachment at 15 months with the Strange Situation Procedure (n = 66). There was a mean positive correlation between moment-to-moment parent and infant affective valence, indicating synchronous affective interaction during the still-face (d = 0.63). Higher levels of affect interaction during the still-face episode were detected in infants later classified as disorganised compared to securely attached (d = 0.97). Findings underscore the importance of testing for still-face interaction and suggest that this interaction may be an unappreciated predictor of infant attachment outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何静止?静止时父母与婴儿的互动与婴儿日后的依恋关系
在 "面对面/静止面对面"(FFSF)的 "静止面对面 "环节中,父母被要求变得毫无反应。然而,婴儿与父母之间的互动可能是不可抑制的,而且有证据表明,静止时的互动与依恋结果有关。为了探讨这些问题,我们对73名6个月大的婴儿(45名男性;36名西班牙裔/拉丁裔;38名白人、3名黑人/非裔美国人、2名亚裔、30名多种族)和他们的父母(年龄=36岁;5名男性;30名西班牙裔/拉丁裔;65名白人、3名黑人/非裔美国人、2名亚裔、2名未知)在静止面对面过程中的连续情感价位(从消极到积极)进行了独立编码,并在婴儿15个月时用陌生情境程序(n = 66)对依恋进行了评估。父母和婴儿的情感价位在瞬间之间存在平均正相关,表明在静止面孔期间存在同步情感互动(d = 0.63)。与安全依恋的婴儿相比,后来被归类为无组织依恋的婴儿在静止表情过程中的情感互动水平更高(d = 0.97)。研究结果强调了测试静止面互动的重要性,并表明这种互动可能是预测婴儿依恋结果的一个未被重视的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Infant and Child Development
Infant and Child Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Infant and Child Development publishes high quality empirical, theoretical and methodological papers addressing psychological development from the antenatal period through to adolescence. The journal brings together research on: - social and emotional development - perceptual and motor development - cognitive development - language development atypical development (including conduct problems, anxiety and depressive conditions, language impairments, autistic spectrum disorders, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders)
期刊最新文献
Brain Morphometry of Toddlers With Language Delay: An Exploratory Study Feasibility and Acceptability of the Mazi Umntanakho Digital Tool in South African Settings: A Qualitative Evaluation Defining Parent Responsiveness: A Systematic Review‐Based Theoretical Model Strengthening Developmental Science With Psychometric Evaluations: An Examination of the Spatial Arrangement Method as a Measure of Semantic Structure in Children A Comparison of Sleep and Settle Behaviours Across Twins and Singletons at 5 Months of Age
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1