Gossip is a crucial social cognitive skill that individuals encounter from early childhood and continues to play a significant role in daily life throughout different stages of development. While gossip is often associated with negative connotations, it is defined as the sharing of information about a third party who is not present. As a result, the valence of gossip—whether positive or negative—depends on the content being shared. Additionally, the behaviour of the person sharing the gossip can influence our judgement of the situation. In light of this, the present study explored how the content of gossip and the prosocial or antisocial behaviours of the gossiper affect the evaluations of children. The study involved 93 children, 50 of whom were girls, with ages ranging from 4 to 6 years ( M age = 5.01 years). The participants were initially presented with vignettes using picture cards, in which the gossiper displayed either prosocial or antisocial behaviour. Following this, they were introduced to additional vignettes in which the gossiper shared information with either positive or negative content. In total, four distinct conditions were created: prosocial behaviour with negative gossip, prosocial behaviour with positive gossip, antisocial behaviour with negative gossip, and antisocial behaviour with positive gossip. The findings of the study revealed that children aged 4 to 6 tend to focus on the positive content of the gossip in their evaluations. However, when considering the behaviour of the gossiper, the prosocial or antisocial nature of the gossiper's actions had a greater influence on their judgement than the content of the gossip itself. The results are discussed in terms of how the impact of gossip content and the gossiper's behaviour varies with age.
{"title":"Is It the Content or the Gossiper's Behaviour While Evaluating Gossip for Children?","authors":"Muhammed Sukru Aydin","doi":"10.1002/icd.70086","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.70086","url":null,"abstract":"Gossip is a crucial social cognitive skill that individuals encounter from early childhood and continues to play a significant role in daily life throughout different stages of development. While gossip is often associated with negative connotations, it is defined as the sharing of information about a third party who is not present. As a result, the valence of gossip—whether positive or negative—depends on the content being shared. Additionally, the behaviour of the person sharing the gossip can influence our judgement of the situation. In light of this, the present study explored how the content of gossip and the prosocial or antisocial behaviours of the gossiper affect the evaluations of children. The study involved 93 children, 50 of whom were girls, with ages ranging from 4 to 6 years ( <jats:italic>M</jats:italic> age = 5.01 years). The participants were initially presented with vignettes using picture cards, in which the gossiper displayed either prosocial or antisocial behaviour. Following this, they were introduced to additional vignettes in which the gossiper shared information with either positive or negative content. In total, four distinct conditions were created: prosocial behaviour with negative gossip, prosocial behaviour with positive gossip, antisocial behaviour with negative gossip, and antisocial behaviour with positive gossip. The findings of the study revealed that children aged 4 to 6 tend to focus on the positive content of the gossip in their evaluations. However, when considering the behaviour of the gossiper, the prosocial or antisocial nature of the gossiper's actions had a greater influence on their judgement than the content of the gossip itself. The results are discussed in terms of how the impact of gossip content and the gossiper's behaviour varies with age.","PeriodicalId":47820,"journal":{"name":"Infant and Child Development","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146134348","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) has been validated across many cultural settings, yet evidence from Taiwan is scarce and derives mainly from metropolitan populations. No data are available from Changhua County, central Taiwan—an area with a strong agricultural profile and socio-demographic characteristics distinct from the more urbanised north and south. After exclusions, valid data from 1008 elementary school students (ages 7–12) were analysed. Parents and teachers completed questionnaires for all children, and students in grades 5–6 provided self-reports. Normative data and percentile-based cutoff scores were established. Reliability was generally satisfactory, though weaker for peer and conduct problem subscales, particularly in self-reports. Inter-rater correlations were modest (r = 0.15–0.48), with especially low agreement between teachers and other informants on emotional symptoms. Exploratory factor analysis partially supported the intended structure. These findings demonstrate that while the SDQ is a practical tool for school-based screening in Taiwan, peer and conduct domains require cautious interpretation and socio-demographic context should be considered when applying the instrument across different regions.
{"title":"Psychometric Evaluation of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in Central Taiwan: Assessing Mental Health in School Children","authors":"Jing-Jung Yang, Hsi-chu Yang, Jhih-Yuan Lu, Fei-Hung Hung","doi":"10.1002/icd.70088","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.70088","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) has been validated across many cultural settings, yet evidence from Taiwan is scarce and derives mainly from metropolitan populations. No data are available from Changhua County, central Taiwan—an area with a strong agricultural profile and socio-demographic characteristics distinct from the more urbanised north and south. After exclusions, valid data from 1008 elementary school students (ages 7–12) were analysed. Parents and teachers completed questionnaires for all children, and students in grades 5–6 provided self-reports. Normative data and percentile-based cutoff scores were established. Reliability was generally satisfactory, though weaker for peer and conduct problem subscales, particularly in self-reports. Inter-rater correlations were modest (<i>r</i> = 0.15–0.48), with especially low agreement between teachers and other informants on emotional symptoms. Exploratory factor analysis partially supported the intended structure. These findings demonstrate that while the SDQ is a practical tool for school-based screening in Taiwan, peer and conduct domains require cautious interpretation and socio-demographic context should be considered when applying the instrument across different regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47820,"journal":{"name":"Infant and Child Development","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/icd.70088","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146139225","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rebecca A. Dore, Daniela Avelar, Britt Singletary, Kammi Schmeer, Laura M. Justice
Children's early print and screen media experiences at home shape language and literacy development, but screen media can displace reading and vary by socioeconomic status (SES). This study examines how family stressors (economic strain, parent psychological distress, inter-relational stress) and protective factors (parent activity involvement, parenting self-efficacy, perceived parental impact, social support and external childcare) influence children's print and screen media experiences in lower-SES families. This study uses data from 222 mothers to child dyads (46% Black, 38% White) from the longitudinal SMALL Talk project, focusing on families experiencing poverty. Data were collected at children's age 40–44 months via interviews and online surveys. Findings will inform how family contexts can promote or hinder positive print and screen media engagement to support child development and school readiness.
{"title":"Print and Screen Media in Families Experiencing Low Income: The Impact of Stressors and Protective Factors","authors":"Rebecca A. Dore, Daniela Avelar, Britt Singletary, Kammi Schmeer, Laura M. Justice","doi":"10.1002/icd.70084","DOIUrl":"10.1002/icd.70084","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Children's early print and screen media experiences at home shape language and literacy development, but screen media can displace reading and vary by socioeconomic status (SES). This study examines how family stressors (economic strain, parent psychological distress, inter-relational stress) and protective factors (parent activity involvement, parenting self-efficacy, perceived parental impact, social support and external childcare) influence children's print and screen media experiences in lower-SES families. This study uses data from 222 mothers to child dyads (46% Black, 38% White) from the longitudinal SMALL Talk project, focusing on families experiencing poverty. Data were collected at children's age 40–44 months via interviews and online surveys. Findings will inform how family contexts can promote or hinder positive print and screen media engagement to support child development and school readiness.</p>","PeriodicalId":47820,"journal":{"name":"Infant and Child Development","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/icd.70084","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146122060","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
There is a vital need to conduct age‐appropriate programs that are suited to a child's stage of development in which the child, the parents, the school, and the community can work together to prevent sexual abuse. The ‘My Body is Safe’ program for parents and children seeks to provide children with the skills of self‐protection. The participants in the study were 70 preschool children of the ages 4–6. The data for the study, which was conducted over the period March–May 2022, were collected with a Parent and Child Information Form and the ‘What If Situation Test’. Following a pretest administered to the experimental and control groups, the experimental group was offered six 20‐min ‘My Body is Safe’ program sessions. To evaluate the effectiveness of the program, a posttest was administered at the end of the sixth session and a follow‐up test 2 months later. The mean age of the children participating in the study was 5.58 ± 0.52. It was observed following the program that the scores of the experimental group on all the subscales of the What If Test had increased significantly ( p < 0.05). No change was seen in the scores of the control group ( p > 0.05). The ‘My Body is Safe’ program is an effective program for developing children's self‐protection skills. It is recommended that nurse‐led body safety training is included in school curriculums and widely provided to preschool children.
有一个至关重要的需要,就是开展适合儿童发展阶段的适龄计划,使儿童、家长、学校和社区能够共同努力防止性虐待。针对父母和孩子的“我的身体是安全的”项目旨在为孩子们提供自我保护的技能。这项研究的参与者是70名4-6岁的学龄前儿童。这项研究的数据是在2022年3月至5月期间进行的,通过父母和孩子信息表和“如果情况测试”收集的。在对实验组和对照组进行预试后,实验组接受了6个20分钟的“我的身体是安全的”节目。为了评估该计划的有效性,在第六期结束时进行后测,并在2个月后进行随访测试。参与研究的儿童平均年龄为5.58±0.52岁。程序编制后观察到,实验组What If Test各分量表得分均显著提高(p < 0.05)。对照组两组评分差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。“我的身体是安全的”计划是一个有效的计划,以发展儿童的自我保护技能。建议将护士主导的身体安全培训纳入学校课程,并广泛提供给学龄前儿童。
{"title":"The Impact of the ‘My Body Is Safe’ Animated Film Program on Children's Skills in Self‐Protection Against Sexual Abuse: A Randomised Controlled Study","authors":"Seda Dulcek, Fatma Nevin Sisman","doi":"10.1002/icd.70079","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.70079","url":null,"abstract":"There is a vital need to conduct age‐appropriate programs that are suited to a child's stage of development in which the child, the parents, the school, and the community can work together to prevent sexual abuse. The ‘My Body is Safe’ program for parents and children seeks to provide children with the skills of self‐protection. The participants in the study were 70 preschool children of the ages 4–6. The data for the study, which was conducted over the period March–May 2022, were collected with a Parent and Child Information Form and the ‘What If Situation Test’. Following a pretest administered to the experimental and control groups, the experimental group was offered six 20‐min ‘My Body is Safe’ program sessions. To evaluate the effectiveness of the program, a posttest was administered at the end of the sixth session and a follow‐up test 2 months later. The mean age of the children participating in the study was 5.58 ± 0.52. It was observed following the program that the scores of the experimental group on all the subscales of the What If Test had increased significantly ( <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.05). No change was seen in the scores of the control group ( <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> > 0.05). The ‘My Body is Safe’ program is an effective program for developing children's self‐protection skills. It is recommended that nurse‐led body safety training is included in school curriculums and widely provided to preschool children.","PeriodicalId":47820,"journal":{"name":"Infant and Child Development","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146089532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}