A comparison study on self-regulation and sense of presence in online learning: a meta-analytic review

IF 2.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Asia Pacific Education Review Pub Date : 2024-03-05 DOI:10.1007/s12564-024-09937-6
Ahrong Beik
{"title":"A comparison study on self-regulation and sense of presence in online learning: a meta-analytic review","authors":"Ahrong Beik","doi":"10.1007/s12564-024-09937-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aims to compare the influence of learners’ self-regulation and sense of presence on online learning. Due to the increasing influence of online learning, self-regulation has received considerable attention. However, it is also claimed that an increased sense of presence can enhance online learning effects. For comparison, a meta-analysis was conducted on correlation studies. A total of 47 studies from 2000 to 2022 that investigated self-regulation or sense of presence in the context of online learning were analyzed. Average effect sizes were used to compare the influence of self-regulation and sense of presence on the levels of satisfaction with online learning. The moderating effects of self-regulation and sense of presence were also analyzed and compared. The results indicate that the average effect sizes of self-regulation and sense of presence were significant. Regarding the relationship between sense of presence and satisfaction with online learning, the type of sense of presence had no moderating effect. In addition, the average effect size of sense of presence was slightly greater than that of self-regulation. Based on these results, we conclude that sense of presence had a stronger influence on satisfaction with online learning. The importance of sense of presence and various ways to increase it in the context of online learning are also discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47344,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Education Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-024-09937-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to compare the influence of learners’ self-regulation and sense of presence on online learning. Due to the increasing influence of online learning, self-regulation has received considerable attention. However, it is also claimed that an increased sense of presence can enhance online learning effects. For comparison, a meta-analysis was conducted on correlation studies. A total of 47 studies from 2000 to 2022 that investigated self-regulation or sense of presence in the context of online learning were analyzed. Average effect sizes were used to compare the influence of self-regulation and sense of presence on the levels of satisfaction with online learning. The moderating effects of self-regulation and sense of presence were also analyzed and compared. The results indicate that the average effect sizes of self-regulation and sense of presence were significant. Regarding the relationship between sense of presence and satisfaction with online learning, the type of sense of presence had no moderating effect. In addition, the average effect size of sense of presence was slightly greater than that of self-regulation. Based on these results, we conclude that sense of presence had a stronger influence on satisfaction with online learning. The importance of sense of presence and various ways to increase it in the context of online learning are also discussed.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线学习中的自我调节和临场感比较研究:元分析综述
本研究旨在比较学习者的自我调节和存在感对在线学习的影响。由于在线学习的影响越来越大,自我调节受到了广泛关注。然而,也有人声称,增强存在感可以提高在线学习效果。为了进行比较,我们对相关研究进行了元分析。我们分析了 2000 年至 2022 年期间调查在线学习中自我调节或临场感的 47 项研究。平均效应大小用于比较自我调节和存在感对在线学习满意度的影响。此外,还对自我调节和临场感的调节作用进行了分析和比较。结果表明,自我调节和临场感的平均效应大小显著。关于临场感与在线学习满意度之间的关系,临场感类型没有调节作用。此外,临场感的平均效应大小略大于自我调节。基于这些结果,我们得出结论:临场感对在线学习满意度的影响更大。我们还讨论了在线学习中存在感的重要性以及提高存在感的各种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asia Pacific Education Review
Asia Pacific Education Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The Asia Pacific Education Review (APER) aims to stimulate research, encourage academic exchange, and enhance the professional development of scholars and other researchers who are interested in educational and cultural issues in the Asia Pacific region. APER covers all areas of educational research, with a focus on cross-cultural, comparative and other studies with a broad Asia-Pacific context. APER is a peer reviewed journal produced by the Education Research Institute at Seoul National University. It was founded by the Institute of Asia Pacific Education Development, Seoul National University in 2000, which is owned and operated by Education Research Institute at Seoul National University since 2003. APER requires all submitted manuscripts to follow the seventh edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA; http://www.apastyle.org/index.aspx).
期刊最新文献
Development of instructional design principles for using ICT in resource-limited learning environments: a case of Bangladesh Teacher’s views on professional learning and development in primary schools in Fiji Effects of the English language intervention as a foreign language for struggling elementary readers in South Korea: a meta-analysis Foreign higher education and corruption: is host country knowledge a blessing or a curse? Empirical evidence from MENA countries The trajectory of teachers’ multicultural transformation: an analysis of teachers’ beliefs about mathematics as a school subject
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1