Patent protection, externalities, and income inequality

IF 0.7 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Manchester School Pub Date : 2024-03-02 DOI:10.1111/manc.12475
Heng-Chuan Kao, Hsiao-Wen Hung
{"title":"Patent protection, externalities, and income inequality","authors":"Heng-Chuan Kao,&nbsp;Hsiao-Wen Hung","doi":"10.1111/manc.12475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper develops a Schumpeterian growth model with considering consumption and leisure externalities. The main purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of patent protection policy on growth and inequality, as well as the interaction between policy effect and externalities. According to the log form utility function specification, this means that the elasticity of intertemporal substitution is unity. The following are the key findings of this paper. Patent protection policy encourages innovation and increases employment in the R&amp;D industry, which enhances economic growth while increasing income inequality. In regard to externalities, an increase in the degree of consumption (leisure) externalities results in a higher (lower) growth rate and more (smaller) income inequality. When consumption (leisure) externality is greater intensity, the growth effect of patent protection policy becomes stronger (weaker), while its influence on expanding income inequality lessens (enhances). Finally, both the Pareto optimal patent protection policy and the optimal patent policy under the maximization of social welfare positively correlate with consumption externalities, but negatively correlate with leisure externalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":47546,"journal":{"name":"Manchester School","volume":"92 5","pages":"466-493"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manchester School","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/manc.12475","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper develops a Schumpeterian growth model with considering consumption and leisure externalities. The main purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of patent protection policy on growth and inequality, as well as the interaction between policy effect and externalities. According to the log form utility function specification, this means that the elasticity of intertemporal substitution is unity. The following are the key findings of this paper. Patent protection policy encourages innovation and increases employment in the R&D industry, which enhances economic growth while increasing income inequality. In regard to externalities, an increase in the degree of consumption (leisure) externalities results in a higher (lower) growth rate and more (smaller) income inequality. When consumption (leisure) externality is greater intensity, the growth effect of patent protection policy becomes stronger (weaker), while its influence on expanding income inequality lessens (enhances). Finally, both the Pareto optimal patent protection policy and the optimal patent policy under the maximization of social welfare positively correlate with consumption externalities, but negatively correlate with leisure externalities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专利保护、外部因素和收入不平等
本文建立了一个考虑消费和闲暇外部性的熊彼特增长模型。本研究的主要目的是探讨专利保护政策对经济增长和不平等的影响,以及政策效应与外部性之间的相互作用。根据对数形式效用函数规范,这意味着跨期替代弹性为统一。本文的主要结论如下。专利保护政策鼓励创新,增加研发产业的就业,从而促进经济增长,同时加剧收入不平等。在外部性方面,消费(闲暇)外部性程度的增加会导致经济增长率提高(降低)和收入不平等加剧(缩小)。当消费(闲暇)外部性越强时,专利保护政策的增长效应就越强(越弱),而其对扩大收入不平等的影响就越小(越大)。最后,帕累托最优专利保护政策和社会福利最大化下的最优专利政策都与消费外部性正相关,但与闲暇外部性负相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Manchester School
Manchester School ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The Manchester School was first published more than seventy years ago and has become a distinguished, internationally recognised, general economics journal. The Manchester School publishes high-quality research covering all areas of the economics discipline, although the editors particularly encourage original contributions, or authoritative surveys, in the fields of microeconomics (including industrial organisation and game theory), macroeconomics, econometrics (both theory and applied) and labour economics.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Robots at work: New evidence with recent data Issue Information Strategic advertising in the aftermath of a corporate scandal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1