Experimental measurements and characterization models of caprock breakthrough pressure for CO2 geological storage

IF 10.8 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Earth-Science Reviews Pub Date : 2024-03-02 DOI:10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104732
Bowen Chen , Qi Li , Yongsheng Tan , Tao Yu , Xiaying Li , Xiaochun Li
{"title":"Experimental measurements and characterization models of caprock breakthrough pressure for CO2 geological storage","authors":"Bowen Chen ,&nbsp;Qi Li ,&nbsp;Yongsheng Tan ,&nbsp;Tao Yu ,&nbsp;Xiaying Li ,&nbsp;Xiaochun Li","doi":"10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Caprock plays a critical role in the long-term safety of CO<sub>2</sub> geological storage, and breakthrough pressure serves as a key indicator for evaluating caprock sealing. The purpose of this review is to discuss the latest research progress in experimental testing and characterization models of caprock breakthrough pressure. First, this review provides a summary of the definitions and classifications of caprock sealing and breakthrough pressure. Comprehensive reviews of the measurement apparatuses, methods, influencing factors, characterization models, and caprock sealing thresholds related to breakthrough pressure are provided. In this article, we first review the measurement apparatuses, which include a static-state testing apparatus, triaxial-state testing apparatus, online computed tomography scanning apparatus, and micro/nanofluidic testing apparatus. Static-state and triaxial-state testing apparatuses are suitable for obtaining measurements of breakthrough pressure under in situ conditions. The step-by-step pressure method and residual pressure method are the most widely used measurement methods, but the results of the residual pressure method are 20% to 50% of those obtained by the step-by-step pressure method. We then found that the impact order of lithology on breakthrough pressure is gypsum or saltstone &gt; mudstone or shale &gt; limestone &gt; argillaceous mudstone &gt; muddy siltstone &gt; igneous rock &gt; sandstone, with a minimum threshold value of 2 MPa for caprock breakthrough pressure. For shale and gypsum, the breakthrough pressure of CO<sub>2</sub> is 50% to 80% that of CH<sub>4</sub> and 55% to 85% that of N<sub>2</sub>. The breakthrough pressure of rock saturated with water is 2.3 to 6.5 times that of rock saturated with oil and 8.2 to 31.1 times that of rock saturated with air. Moreover, we review classical theoretical models and experimental empirical models for characterizing breakthrough pressure. Empirical models are more accurate than theoretical models for characterizing the actual breakthrough pressure, especially models relating to breakthrough pressure and permeability, which have been widely applied. We finally conclude that the Tarim Basin, Junggar Basin, Ordos Basin, Songliao Basin, and central Sichuan Basin have high caprock sealing capacities. Future research trends include rapid and accurate measurements of breakthrough pressure, characterization and application of breakthrough pressure across multiple scales, and development of models and standards for evaluating caprock sealing capacity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11483,"journal":{"name":"Earth-Science Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth-Science Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001282522400059X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Caprock plays a critical role in the long-term safety of CO2 geological storage, and breakthrough pressure serves as a key indicator for evaluating caprock sealing. The purpose of this review is to discuss the latest research progress in experimental testing and characterization models of caprock breakthrough pressure. First, this review provides a summary of the definitions and classifications of caprock sealing and breakthrough pressure. Comprehensive reviews of the measurement apparatuses, methods, influencing factors, characterization models, and caprock sealing thresholds related to breakthrough pressure are provided. In this article, we first review the measurement apparatuses, which include a static-state testing apparatus, triaxial-state testing apparatus, online computed tomography scanning apparatus, and micro/nanofluidic testing apparatus. Static-state and triaxial-state testing apparatuses are suitable for obtaining measurements of breakthrough pressure under in situ conditions. The step-by-step pressure method and residual pressure method are the most widely used measurement methods, but the results of the residual pressure method are 20% to 50% of those obtained by the step-by-step pressure method. We then found that the impact order of lithology on breakthrough pressure is gypsum or saltstone > mudstone or shale > limestone > argillaceous mudstone > muddy siltstone > igneous rock > sandstone, with a minimum threshold value of 2 MPa for caprock breakthrough pressure. For shale and gypsum, the breakthrough pressure of CO2 is 50% to 80% that of CH4 and 55% to 85% that of N2. The breakthrough pressure of rock saturated with water is 2.3 to 6.5 times that of rock saturated with oil and 8.2 to 31.1 times that of rock saturated with air. Moreover, we review classical theoretical models and experimental empirical models for characterizing breakthrough pressure. Empirical models are more accurate than theoretical models for characterizing the actual breakthrough pressure, especially models relating to breakthrough pressure and permeability, which have been widely applied. We finally conclude that the Tarim Basin, Junggar Basin, Ordos Basin, Songliao Basin, and central Sichuan Basin have high caprock sealing capacities. Future research trends include rapid and accurate measurements of breakthrough pressure, characterization and application of breakthrough pressure across multiple scales, and development of models and standards for evaluating caprock sealing capacity.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二氧化碳地质封存顶岩突破压力的实验测量和表征模型
毛岩对一氧化碳地质封存的长期安全起着至关重要的作用,而突破压力是评价毛岩密封性的关键指标。本综述旨在讨论毛岩突破压力实验测试和表征模型的最新研究进展。首先,本综述概述了毛岩封闭性和突破压力的定义和分类。全面回顾了与突破压力相关的测量仪器、方法、影响因素、表征模型和毛岩密封阈值。本文首先评述了测量仪器,包括静态测试仪器、三轴状态测试仪器、在线 CT 扫描仪器和微/纳流体测试仪器。静态和三轴测试仪器适用于在原位条件下测量突破压力。逐级压力法和残余压力法是最广泛使用的测量方法,但残余压力法的结果是逐级压力法的 20% 至 50%。我们随后发现,岩性对突破压力的影响顺序为石膏盐岩 > 泥岩或页岩 > 石灰岩 > 霰质泥岩 > 泥质粉砂岩 > 火成岩 > 砂岩,盖岩突破压力的最小临界值为 2 兆帕。在页岩和石膏中,CO 的突破压力是 CH 的 50%至 80%,N 的 55%至 85%。含水饱和岩石的突破压力是含油饱和岩石的 2.3 至 6.5 倍,是含气饱和岩石的 8.2 至 31.1 倍。此外,我们还回顾了表征突破压力的经典理论模型和实验经验模型。在表征实际突破压力方面,经验模型比理论模型更准确,尤其是与突破压力和渗透率有关的模型,已得到广泛应用。最后,我们得出结论:塔里木盆地、准噶尔盆地、鄂尔多斯盆地、松辽盆地和四川盆地中部具有较高的盖层密封能力。未来的研究趋势包括:快速、准确地测量突破压力,在多种尺度上描述和应用突破压力,以及开发用于评估盖层密封能力的模型和标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Earth-Science Reviews
Earth-Science Reviews 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
21.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
294
审稿时长
15.1 weeks
期刊介绍: Covering a much wider field than the usual specialist journals, Earth Science Reviews publishes review articles dealing with all aspects of Earth Sciences, and is an important vehicle for allowing readers to see their particular interest related to the Earth Sciences as a whole.
期刊最新文献
Peat fires and legacy toxic metal release: An integrative biogeochemical and ecohydrological conceptual framework Microplastics Aloft: A comprehensive exploration of sources, transport, variations, interactions and their implications on human health in the atmospheric realm Degradation and local growth of “Xing'an-Baikal” permafrost responding to climate warming and the consequences Deposition and termination of Neoproterozoic iron formations (NIFs): New insights from NIFs in China Mantle-rooted fluid pathways and world-class gold mineralization in the giant Jiaodong gold province: Insights from integrated deep seismic reflection and tectonics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1