Ocular radiation exposure is negligible in normal volume endourological practice.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-06 DOI:10.1308/rcsann.2024.0004
J Peacock, J Henderson
{"title":"Ocular radiation exposure is negligible in normal volume endourological practice.","authors":"J Peacock, J Henderson","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The annual dose limit for radiation exposure to the eye has been reduced recently; the eye is widely recognised as one of the most radiosensitive tissues in the body. There is minimal good quality research as to the radiation dose that the eye receives during endourological surgery and this study aimed to address this.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study was performed over an 8-month period at a single large teaching hospital in the UK. Three index procedures were included: ureteric stent insertion, ureteroscopy (URS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Surgeons wore a dosimeter on the glabella with fluoroscopy time (FT) and dose area product (DAP) recorded for each case.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 404 procedures were included (247 URSs, 150 ureteric stent insertions and 7 PCNLs). Dosimeters were worn by ten surgeons. Mean FTs (URS 20.56s; ureteric stent 18.96s; PCNL 360.67s) and mean DAP (URS 100.82cGy/m<sup>2</sup>, ureteric stent 119.82cGy/m<sup>2</sup> and PCNL 1121.62cGy/m<sup>2</sup>) were identified with significant intersurgeon variability. No surgeon had a total dosimeter dose >0.00mSv.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The International Commission on Radiological Protection recently reduced the yearly eye dose limit from 150 to 20mSv. Cataractogenesis is no longer considered a typical deterministic effect, with a threshold level below which no effect occurs. Even in higher volume centres, these annual limits are unlikely to be reached. Lead glasses may be considered for surgeons and radiologists with the highest exposure but, for the majority, ocular radiation exposure is negligible.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":"141-145"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11785437/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2024.0004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The annual dose limit for radiation exposure to the eye has been reduced recently; the eye is widely recognised as one of the most radiosensitive tissues in the body. There is minimal good quality research as to the radiation dose that the eye receives during endourological surgery and this study aimed to address this.

Methods: A prospective study was performed over an 8-month period at a single large teaching hospital in the UK. Three index procedures were included: ureteric stent insertion, ureteroscopy (URS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Surgeons wore a dosimeter on the glabella with fluoroscopy time (FT) and dose area product (DAP) recorded for each case.

Results: A total of 404 procedures were included (247 URSs, 150 ureteric stent insertions and 7 PCNLs). Dosimeters were worn by ten surgeons. Mean FTs (URS 20.56s; ureteric stent 18.96s; PCNL 360.67s) and mean DAP (URS 100.82cGy/m2, ureteric stent 119.82cGy/m2 and PCNL 1121.62cGy/m2) were identified with significant intersurgeon variability. No surgeon had a total dosimeter dose >0.00mSv.

Conclusions: The International Commission on Radiological Protection recently reduced the yearly eye dose limit from 150 to 20mSv. Cataractogenesis is no longer considered a typical deterministic effect, with a threshold level below which no effect occurs. Even in higher volume centres, these annual limits are unlikely to be reached. Lead glasses may be considered for surgeons and radiologists with the highest exposure but, for the majority, ocular radiation exposure is negligible.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在正常容量的腔内造影术中,眼部辐射可忽略不计。
导言:最近,眼部的年度辐射剂量限制有所降低;眼部被公认为人体中对辐射最敏感的组织之一。关于眼球在腔内放射外科手术中受到的辐射剂量,高质量的研究极少,本研究旨在解决这一问题:这项前瞻性研究在英国一家大型教学医院进行,为期 8 个月。三项指标性手术包括:输尿管支架植入术、输尿管镜检查(URS)和经皮肾取石术(PCNL)。外科医生在臀部佩戴剂量计,记录每个病例的透视时间(FT)和剂量面积乘积(DAP):结果:共纳入 404 例手术(247 例 URS、150 例输尿管支架植入术和 7 例 PCNL)。十名外科医生佩戴了剂量计。确定的平均 FTs(URS 20.56s;输尿管支架 18.96s;PCNL 360.67s)和平均 DAP(URS 100.82cGy/m2,输尿管支架 119.82cGy/m2 和 PCNL 1121.62cGy/m2)在外科医生之间存在显著差异。没有一名外科医生的总剂量大于 0.00mSv:国际放射防护委员会最近将每年的眼部剂量限值从 150mSv 降至 20mSv。白内障的发生不再被认为是一种典型的确定性效应,其阈值水平低于该水平就不会产生效应。即使在放射量较高的中心,也不太可能达到这些年度限值。对于暴露量最高的外科医生和放射科医生,可以考虑佩戴铅眼镜,但对于大多数人来说,眼部辐射暴露量可以忽略不计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
316
期刊介绍: The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England is the official scholarly research journal of the Royal College of Surgeons and is published eight times a year in January, February, March, April, May, July, September and November. The main aim of the journal is to publish high-quality, peer-reviewed papers that relate to all branches of surgery. The Annals also includes letters and comments, a regular technical section, controversial topics, CORESS feedback and book reviews. The editorial board is composed of experts from all the surgical specialties.
期刊最新文献
Nasopharyngeal malignant melanoma masquerading in the gallbladder: the importance of histological assessment. Broken tibial nail extraction: a useful technique. Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children at paediatric centres and adult centres: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Management of acute colonic pseudo-obstruction: opportunities to improve care? Ocular radiation exposure is negligible in normal volume endourological practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1