Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-04-02DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0108
D L Crook, Ome Padfield
Background: Perianal abscesses are common presentations and reasons for emergency general surgery admissions. Management involves incision and drainage of the abscess and packing the cavity with internal wound dressings. This meta-analysis aimed to assess in adults if packing an abscess or leaving it unpacked leads to a significant difference in the outcomes of pain on wound dressing, time to healing, rate of fistulation and abscess recurrence.
Methods: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with participants aged 18 years or older that compared packing of perianal abscess cavities with no packing between 2002 and 2022 were searched for in December 2022 on OVID Medline and Embase, the CENTRAL register of trials, PubMed and Google Scholar. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Random effects meta-analysis was conducted on the data extracted.
Results: Three RCTs involving 490 patients were analysed for the outcomes of abscess recurrence and postoperative fistula formation; the data were not adequate to assess pain on dressing and time to healing. For unpacked versus packed, the pooled relative risk of abscess recurrence was 1.57 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.764, 3.29, p=0.219) and for fistula formation 0.686 (95% CI 0.430, 1.09, p=0.114). These results suggest there is no significant benefit to packing abscess cavities.
Conclusions: Analysis of the outcomes suggests there is no significant difference with regards to rates of abscess recurrence or fistula formation between the packed and unpacked groups; however, appropriately powered RCTs are required in this area to provide more primary evidence to inform best practice and clinical management.
{"title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of packing in the management of perianal abscesses.","authors":"D L Crook, Ome Padfield","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0108","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0108","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perianal abscesses are common presentations and reasons for emergency general surgery admissions. Management involves incision and drainage of the abscess and packing the cavity with internal wound dressings. This meta-analysis aimed to assess in adults if packing an abscess or leaving it unpacked leads to a significant difference in the outcomes of pain on wound dressing, time to healing, rate of fistulation and abscess recurrence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with participants aged 18 years or older that compared packing of perianal abscess cavities with no packing between 2002 and 2022 were searched for in December 2022 on OVID Medline and Embase, the CENTRAL register of trials, PubMed and Google Scholar. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Random effects meta-analysis was conducted on the data extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three RCTs involving 490 patients were analysed for the outcomes of abscess recurrence and postoperative fistula formation; the data were not adequate to assess pain on dressing and time to healing. For unpacked versus packed, the pooled relative risk of abscess recurrence was 1.57 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.764, 3.29, <i>p</i>=0.219) and for fistula formation 0.686 (95% CI 0.430, 1.09, <i>p</i>=0.114). These results suggest there is no significant benefit to packing abscess cavities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Analysis of the outcomes suggests there is no significant difference with regards to rates of abscess recurrence or fistula formation between the packed and unpacked groups; however, appropriately powered RCTs are required in this area to provide more primary evidence to inform best practice and clinical management.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":"29-34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140334521","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2023-02-07DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0148
L Drummond, A McNeill
This case report aims to encourage teams to readjust the operating table during prolonged robotic cases, especially in those patients with a high body mass index. We present the case of a 59-year-old male who developed neuropathic pain involving the suprascapular nerve distribution following a prolonged robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
{"title":"Suprascapular nerve injury during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a case report.","authors":"L Drummond, A McNeill","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2022.0148","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2022.0148","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This case report aims to encourage teams to readjust the operating table during prolonged robotic cases, especially in those patients with a high body mass index. We present the case of a 59-year-old male who developed neuropathic pain involving the suprascapular nerve distribution following a prolonged robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":"83-84"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11658876/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10718792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-04-02DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0029
L Paramore, A S Chetwood
{"title":"Role of urinary pregnancy testing in the diagnosis of men with testicular cancer.","authors":"L Paramore, A S Chetwood","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0029","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0029","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":"73"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11658873/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140334529","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2023-05-23DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0023
V L Fretwell, E G Kane, S MacPherson, P Skaife
Gastric cancer is common with well-established routes of spread. Metastasis to the colon or rectum is rare; however, we have recently managed two patients with this clinical picture. We present these cases together with a literature review of current practice. A systematic review in PubMed using the terms 'gastric cancer' and 'colorectal metastasis' was performed. The identified papers were screened for relevance and the reference lists of relevant papers were also reviewed to ensure capture of all relevant reports. Twenty-four papers containing 26 cases of gastric cancer with metastasis to the colon or rectum were found. There was wide variation in presentation and practice in these cases, which tended to be in patients with poor histopathological features. Diagnosis is often challenging owing to the unusual radiological appearance and submucosal nature of the metastatic lesions. Treatment ranges from palliative care to radical resection. Colorectal metastases from gastric primary cancer are rare, but cases are reported and should be part of the index of suspicion during the work-up of patients with lower gastrointestinal symptoms and a history of gastric cancer. Treatment options range from aggressive surgical resection to palliative care and should be centred on the patient's fitness and wishes.
{"title":"Metastases from gastric cancer presenting as colorectal lesions: a report of two cases and systematic review.","authors":"V L Fretwell, E G Kane, S MacPherson, P Skaife","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0023","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gastric cancer is common with well-established routes of spread. Metastasis to the colon or rectum is rare; however, we have recently managed two patients with this clinical picture. We present these cases together with a literature review of current practice. A systematic review in PubMed using the terms 'gastric cancer' and 'colorectal metastasis' was performed. The identified papers were screened for relevance and the reference lists of relevant papers were also reviewed to ensure capture of all relevant reports. Twenty-four papers containing 26 cases of gastric cancer with metastasis to the colon or rectum were found. There was wide variation in presentation and practice in these cases, which tended to be in patients with poor histopathological features. Diagnosis is often challenging owing to the unusual radiological appearance and submucosal nature of the metastatic lesions. Treatment ranges from palliative care to radical resection. Colorectal metastases from gastric primary cancer are rare, but cases are reported and should be part of the index of suspicion during the work-up of patients with lower gastrointestinal symptoms and a history of gastric cancer. Treatment options range from aggressive surgical resection to palliative care and should be centred on the patient's fitness and wishes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":"76-82"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11658880/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9741077","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-02-13DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0106
J Saleem, O Brown, C Mclean, K Kurzatkowski, S Radha, R Mallina
Introduction: Inefficiencies in the trauma setting are well known and have been further exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic among other factors, resulting in national guidance to aid improvements in resource utilisation. This study introduced a novel surgeon-led intervention, a trauma bed in recovery, with the aim of improving trauma theatre efficiency.
Methods: This quality improvement project was conducted using a Plan Do Study Act (PDSA) methodology and comprised multiple cycles to assess theatre performance. A multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach with relevant stakeholder input enabled intervention implementation, aimed at facilitating 'golden patient' arrival in the anaesthetic room as early as possible. The primary outcome was the time at which the first patient entered the anaesthetic room, and the secondary outcome was the number of cases performed each day.
Results: The study period was 1 year and encompassed three PDSA cycles. The intervention achieved its primary outcome by PDSA cycle 1 and its secondary outcome by PDSA cycle 2, demonstrating statistically significantly improved results (p < 0.001). A subanalysis assessed the specific impact of the intervention, and demonstrated a significant improvement in both outcomes when the intervention was used as intended (p < 0.0005).
Conclusions: A ringfenced trauma bed significantly improved theatre start times and thereby theatre efficiency. This is a simple, pragmatic intervention that benefitted the MDT trauma team while also demonstrating a sustained impact. Given that National Health Service efficiency is at the forefront of national healthcare discourse, we recommend that this intervention is implemented in other trauma units to help provide a solution to this longstanding issue.
{"title":"The provision of a trauma bed in theatre recovery and its impact on trauma theatre efficiency: experience from a high-volume trauma unit.","authors":"J Saleem, O Brown, C Mclean, K Kurzatkowski, S Radha, R Mallina","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0106","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0106","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Inefficiencies in the trauma setting are well known and have been further exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic among other factors, resulting in national guidance to aid improvements in resource utilisation. This study introduced a novel surgeon-led intervention, a trauma bed in recovery, with the aim of improving trauma theatre efficiency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This quality improvement project was conducted using a Plan Do Study Act (PDSA) methodology and comprised multiple cycles to assess theatre performance. A multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach with relevant stakeholder input enabled intervention implementation, aimed at facilitating 'golden patient' arrival in the anaesthetic room as early as possible. The primary outcome was the time at which the first patient entered the anaesthetic room, and the secondary outcome was the number of cases performed each day.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study period was 1 year and encompassed three PDSA cycles. The intervention achieved its primary outcome by PDSA cycle 1 and its secondary outcome by PDSA cycle 2, demonstrating statistically significantly improved results (<i>p</i> < 0.001). A subanalysis assessed the specific impact of the intervention, and demonstrated a significant improvement in both outcomes when the intervention was used as intended (<i>p</i> < 0.0005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A ringfenced trauma bed significantly improved theatre start times and thereby theatre efficiency. This is a simple, pragmatic intervention that benefitted the MDT trauma team while also demonstrating a sustained impact. Given that National Health Service efficiency is at the forefront of national healthcare discourse, we recommend that this intervention is implemented in other trauma units to help provide a solution to this longstanding issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":"35-40"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11658875/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139721376","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-02-16DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0101
Introduction: Scrotal exploration for suspected testicular torsion is a common emergency procedure in the United Kingdom (UK). There is no universally agreed practice for how the testis should be fixed, or whether a nontorted testis should receive fixation. This survey aims to describe the methods used for emergency scrotal exploration and testicular fixation in the UK.
Methods: An online survey was distributed to urologists, general surgeons and specialist paediatric surgeons in approved NHS trusts, and via the email lists of collaborating organisations. The survey questioned surgeons on their operative management of a variety of common diagnoses encountered during scrotal exploration using multiple choice and free-text answers.
Results: A total of 340 responses were received from 83 institutions. Respondents included urologists (consultants, 33%; trainees, 24%), paediatric surgeons (consultants, 12%; trainees, 16%) and general surgeons. In cases of torsion, respondents predominantly perform sutured fixation (74%); however, sutureless dartos pouch fixation was used frequently (37%) by paediatric surgeons. The finding of 'bell-clapper' anatomy without torsion prompts 69% of respondents to undertake sutured fixation, but alternative nontorsion diagnoses frequently prompt use of sutureless methods (53-66%).
Conclusion: This study is the largest survey of methods for emergency scrotal exploration and describes current UK practice. The majority of surgeons prefer sutured fixation in cases of torsion and/or bell-clapper anomalies, and sutureless methods in the absence of it.
{"title":"A national survey of practice for the emergency fixation of testis.","authors":"","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0101","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0101","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Scrotal exploration for suspected testicular torsion is a common emergency procedure in the United Kingdom (UK). There is no universally agreed practice for how the testis should be fixed, or whether a nontorted testis should receive fixation. This survey aims to describe the methods used for emergency scrotal exploration and testicular fixation in the UK.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was distributed to urologists, general surgeons and specialist paediatric surgeons in approved NHS trusts, and via the email lists of collaborating organisations. The survey questioned surgeons on their operative management of a variety of common diagnoses encountered during scrotal exploration using multiple choice and free-text answers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 340 responses were received from 83 institutions. Respondents included urologists (consultants, 33%; trainees, 24%), paediatric surgeons (consultants, 12%; trainees, 16%) and general surgeons. In cases of torsion, respondents predominantly perform sutured fixation (74%); however, sutureless dartos pouch fixation was used frequently (37%) by paediatric surgeons. The finding of 'bell-clapper' anatomy without torsion prompts 69% of respondents to undertake sutured fixation, but alternative nontorsion diagnoses frequently prompt use of sutureless methods (53-66%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study is the largest survey of methods for emergency scrotal exploration and describes current UK practice. The majority of surgeons prefer sutured fixation in cases of torsion and/or bell-clapper anomalies, and sutureless methods in the absence of it.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":"48-53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11658877/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139740226","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-02-16DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0031
J Maudsley, R E Clifford, O Aziz, P A Sutton
Introduction: Pelvic exenteration (PE) is now the standard of care for locally advanced (LARC) and locally recurrent (LRRC) rectal cancer. Reports of the significant short-term morbidity and survival advantage conferred by R0 resection are well established. However, longer-term outcomes are rarely addressed. This systematic review focuses on long-term oncosurgical and quality of life (QoL) outcomes following PE for rectal cancer.
Methods: A systematic review of the PubMed®, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE® and Embase® databases was conducted, in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Studies were included if they reported long-term outcomes following PE for LARC or LRRC. Studies with fewer than 20 patients were excluded.
Findings: A total of 25 papers reported outcomes for 5,489 patients. Of these, 4,744 underwent PE for LARC (57.5%) or LRRC (42.5%). R0 resection rates ranged from 23.2% to 98.4% and from 14.9% to 77.8% respectively. The overall morbidity rates were 17.8-87.0%. The median survival ranged from 12.5 to 140.0 months. None of these studies reported functional outcomes and only four studies reported QoL outcomes. Numerous different metrics and timepoints were utilised, with QoL scores frequently returning to baseline by 12 months.
Conclusions: This review demonstrates that PE is safe, with a good prospect of R0 resection and acceptable mortality rates in selected patients. Morbidity rates remain high, highlighting the importance of shared decision making with patients. Longer-term oncological outcomes as well as QoL and functional outcomes need to be addressed in future studies. Development of a core outcomes set would facilitate better reporting in this complex and challenging patient group.
简介:盆腔外扩张术(PE)是目前治疗局部晚期(LARC)和局部复发(LRRC)直肠癌的标准方法。R0 切除术在短期发病率和生存率方面具有显著优势,这一点已得到公认。然而,长期疗效却鲜有报道。本系统性综述侧重于直肠癌PE术后的长期手术和生活质量(QoL)结果:方法:根据 PRISMA(系统综述和元分析首选报告项目)指南,对 PubMed®、Cochrane 图书馆、MEDLINE® 和 Embase® 数据库进行了系统综述。如果研究报告了 LARC 或 LRRC PE 后的长期疗效,则将其纳入研究。少于 20 名患者的研究被排除在外:共有 25 篇论文报告了 5489 名患者的治疗结果。其中,4744 名患者因 LARC(57.5%)或 LRRC(42.5%)接受了 PE。R0切除率分别为23.2%至98.4%和14.9%至77.8%。总发病率为17.8%-87.0%。中位生存期从12.5个月到140.0个月不等。这些研究均未报告功能性结果,仅有四项研究报告了 QoL 结果。研究采用了许多不同的指标和时间点,QoL评分经常在12个月后恢复到基线水平:本综述表明,PE 是安全的,在选定的患者中,R0 切除的前景良好,死亡率可接受。发病率仍然很高,这凸显了与患者共同决策的重要性。在未来的研究中,需要探讨较长期的肿瘤学结果以及 QoL 和功能性结果。制定一套核心结果将有助于更好地报告这一复杂而具有挑战性的患者群体。
{"title":"A systematic review of oncosurgical and quality of life outcomes following pelvic exenteration for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer.","authors":"J Maudsley, R E Clifford, O Aziz, P A Sutton","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0031","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0031","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pelvic exenteration (PE) is now the standard of care for locally advanced (LARC) and locally recurrent (LRRC) rectal cancer. Reports of the significant short-term morbidity and survival advantage conferred by R0 resection are well established. However, longer-term outcomes are rarely addressed. This systematic review focuses on long-term oncosurgical and quality of life (QoL) outcomes following PE for rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of the PubMed<sup>®</sup>, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE<sup>®</sup> and Embase<sup>®</sup> databases was conducted, in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Studies were included if they reported long-term outcomes following PE for LARC or LRRC. Studies with fewer than 20 patients were excluded.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 25 papers reported outcomes for 5,489 patients. Of these, 4,744 underwent PE for LARC (57.5%) or LRRC (42.5%). R0 resection rates ranged from 23.2% to 98.4% and from 14.9% to 77.8% respectively. The overall morbidity rates were 17.8-87.0%. The median survival ranged from 12.5 to 140.0 months. None of these studies reported functional outcomes and only four studies reported QoL outcomes. Numerous different metrics and timepoints were utilised, with QoL scores frequently returning to baseline by 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review demonstrates that PE is safe, with a good prospect of R0 resection and acceptable mortality rates in selected patients. Morbidity rates remain high, highlighting the importance of shared decision making with patients. Longer-term oncological outcomes as well as QoL and functional outcomes need to be addressed in future studies. Development of a core outcomes set would facilitate better reporting in this complex and challenging patient group.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":"2-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11658885/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139740228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-02-16DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0099
H Bhachoo, S C Glossop, L R Mattey, C Pearson, L Hoade, N Cereceda-Monteoliva, L Scourfield, A T Poacher
Introduction: Plastic surgery is an important specialty that involves widespread medical knowledge, some of which is taught in undergraduate curricula. The General Medical Council provides a well-defined plastic surgery curriculum for postgraduate training. However, there is no consensus on the provision for undergraduates in this specialty, potentially giving rise to a deficit in undergraduate medical education and a suboptimal basis for plastic surgery postgraduate training. Our aim was to identify the gap in undergraduate plastic surgery teaching and to understand student perceptions of the specialty as well as any trialled interventions.
Methods: A prospectively registered systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The MEDLINE®, Embase™, PubMed® and Google Scholar™ databases were searched for literature relating to undergraduate exposure to plastic surgery and relevant teaching interventions. Ten studies were included in this review, categorised into three main themes: exposure during medical school, determining factors and perceptions for pursuing a plastic surgery career, and teaching interventions.
Results: Surveys assessing medical student perceptions indicate a significant deficit in exposure to plastic surgery in the undergraduate curriculum. Medical students' interest in the specialty is affected by multiple factors, including the amount of surgical exposure in medical school. Interventions to address the deficit mostly involve one-day courses.
Conclusions: Although the literature is currently limited, studies are needed to effectively assess the outcomes of plastic surgery teaching methods in undergraduate training. Moreover, there is a need for consensus around the provision of undergraduate teaching in plastic surgery. This should be reflected in the latest undergraduate curricula in medical education.
导言:整形外科是一门重要的专科,涉及广泛的医学知识,其中一些知识是在本科课程中教授的。医学委员会为研究生培训提供了明确的整形外科课程。然而,在为本科生提供该专业课程方面还没有达成共识,这可能会导致本科医学教育的不足,并为整形外科研究生培训奠定不理想的基础。我们的目的是找出整形外科本科生教学中的不足,了解学生对该专业的看法以及任何尝试过的干预措施:方法:我们按照 PRISMA(系统综述和元分析的首选报告项目)指南进行了一项前瞻性注册系统综述。在 MEDLINE®、Embase™、PubMed® 和 Google Scholar™ 数据库中搜索了与本科生接触整形外科和相关教学干预相关的文献。本综述共纳入十项研究,分为三大主题:医学院期间的接触、从事整形外科职业的决定性因素和看法以及教学干预措施:结果:对医学生看法的调查显示,在本科课程中接触整形外科的机会严重不足。医学生对该专业的兴趣受到多种因素的影响,包括在医学院中接触外科手术的次数。解决这一不足的干预措施大多涉及为期一天的课程:尽管目前文献有限,但仍需开展研究,以有效评估整形外科教学方法在本科生培训中的效果。此外,有必要就整形外科本科教学达成共识。这一点应反映在最新的医学教育本科课程中。
{"title":"Undergraduate deficits in plastic surgery exposure and awareness of the specialty: a systematic review.","authors":"H Bhachoo, S C Glossop, L R Mattey, C Pearson, L Hoade, N Cereceda-Monteoliva, L Scourfield, A T Poacher","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0099","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0099","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Plastic surgery is an important specialty that involves widespread medical knowledge, some of which is taught in undergraduate curricula. The General Medical Council provides a well-defined plastic surgery curriculum for postgraduate training. However, there is no consensus on the provision for undergraduates in this specialty, potentially giving rise to a deficit in undergraduate medical education and a suboptimal basis for plastic surgery postgraduate training. Our aim was to identify the gap in undergraduate plastic surgery teaching and to understand student perceptions of the specialty as well as any trialled interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospectively registered systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The MEDLINE<sup>®</sup>, Embase™, PubMed<sup>®</sup> and Google Scholar™ databases were searched for literature relating to undergraduate exposure to plastic surgery and relevant teaching interventions. Ten studies were included in this review, categorised into three main themes: exposure during medical school, determining factors and perceptions for pursuing a plastic surgery career, and teaching interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surveys assessing medical student perceptions indicate a significant deficit in exposure to plastic surgery in the undergraduate curriculum. Medical students' interest in the specialty is affected by multiple factors, including the amount of surgical exposure in medical school. Interventions to address the deficit mostly involve one-day courses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the literature is currently limited, studies are needed to effectively assess the outcomes of plastic surgery teaching methods in undergraduate training. Moreover, there is a need for consensus around the provision of undergraduate teaching in plastic surgery. This should be reflected in the latest undergraduate curricula in medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":"12-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11658874/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139740235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0115
B Rogers
{"title":"\"It's no use going back to yesterday\".","authors":"B Rogers","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0115","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0115","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":"107 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11658870/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142862785","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-01-04DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0097
P Batra, A O'Connor, J Walmsley, W Baraza, A Sharma
Background: Symptomatic haemorrhoids (SH) are a common condition; however, conventional outpatient treatment, including rubber band ligation, is contraindicated in patients receiving concurrent anticoagulation. Injection sclerotherapy (IST) has been proposed as a treatment option for these patients.
Methods: A retrospective review of case notes was performed in a colorectal surgery department that sits alongside a tertiary cardiothoracic surgical unit. Patients treated with an IST for SH between 1 April 2014 and 30 November 2021 were identified. Anticoagulation was not stopped in these patients as they were at high risk of developing thromboembolism, except in two patients who required alternative procedures. The primary outcome was symptom resolution, defined as no patient reporting bleeding for at least six months. The secondary outcomes were patient-reported complications, number of IST procedures and number of other procedures performed to achieve symptom resolution.
Results: A total of 20 patients with a median age of 64 years (range 35-86, 14 male) who underwent 32 IST treatments were identified. Symptom resolution was achieved in 18 (90%) patients using IST while continuing anticoagulation treatment, with two (10%) patients requiring alternative interventions. Ten patients (50%) required only one IST procedure, and three patients (15%) required two procedures. The remaining five (25%) patients required three or four interventions. The median time between IST treatments was 32 weeks (range 8-133). No complications were reported.
Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that IST can be considered as a potential treatment option for patients with SH who are at a high risk of thromboembolic disease requiring anticoagulation.
背景:无症状痔疮(SH)是一种常见病;然而,包括橡皮筋结扎在内的传统门诊治疗对同时接受抗凝治疗的患者是禁忌症。有人建议将注射硬化剂疗法(IST)作为这些患者的治疗选择:方法:我们对与三级心胸外科毗邻的结直肠外科的病例记录进行了回顾性分析。确定了2014年4月1日至2021年11月30日期间接受IST治疗的SH患者。除两名需要进行其他手术的患者外,其他患者均未停止抗凝治疗,因为这些患者具有发生血栓栓塞的高风险。主要研究结果为症状缓解,即患者至少在六个月内未报告出血。次要结果是患者报告的并发症、IST手术次数以及为缓解症状而进行的其他手术次数:共有 20 名患者接受了 32 次 IST 治疗,中位年龄为 64 岁(35-86 岁,14 名男性)。18名患者(90%)在继续抗凝治疗的同时接受了IST治疗,症状得到缓解,2名患者(10%)需要采取其他干预措施。10 名患者(50%)只需要一次 IST 治疗,3 名患者(15%)需要两次治疗。其余五名患者(25%)需要进行三次或四次干预。IST 治疗的中位间隔时间为 32 周(8-133 周不等)。无并发症报告:我们的研究表明,对于需要抗凝治疗的血栓栓塞性疾病高危 SH 患者,IST 可被视为一种潜在的治疗选择。
{"title":"Injection sclerotherapy for the treatment of haemorrhoids in anticoagulated patients.","authors":"P Batra, A O'Connor, J Walmsley, W Baraza, A Sharma","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0097","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0097","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Symptomatic haemorrhoids (SH) are a common condition; however, conventional outpatient treatment, including rubber band ligation, is contraindicated in patients receiving concurrent anticoagulation. Injection sclerotherapy (IST) has been proposed as a treatment option for these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of case notes was performed in a colorectal surgery department that sits alongside a tertiary cardiothoracic surgical unit. Patients treated with an IST for SH between 1 April 2014 and 30 November 2021 were identified. Anticoagulation was not stopped in these patients as they were at high risk of developing thromboembolism, except in two patients who required alternative procedures. The primary outcome was symptom resolution, defined as no patient reporting bleeding for at least six months. The secondary outcomes were patient-reported complications, number of IST procedures and number of other procedures performed to achieve symptom resolution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 patients with a median age of 64 years (range 35-86, 14 male) who underwent 32 IST treatments were identified. Symptom resolution was achieved in 18 (90%) patients using IST while continuing anticoagulation treatment, with two (10%) patients requiring alternative interventions. Ten patients (50%) required only one IST procedure, and three patients (15%) required two procedures. The remaining five (25%) patients required three or four interventions. The median time between IST treatments was 32 weeks (range 8-133). No complications were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study demonstrates that IST can be considered as a potential treatment option for patients with SH who are at a high risk of thromboembolic disease requiring anticoagulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":"25-28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11658878/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139085628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}