Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using a Set of Novel Needle Instruments.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Surgical Innovation Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-05 DOI:10.1177/15533506241237141
Zhengmin Cui, Duoqiang Zhang, Mingguo Tian, Yafei Wang, Xiuping Yang
{"title":"Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using a Set of Novel Needle Instruments.","authors":"Zhengmin Cui, Duoqiang Zhang, Mingguo Tian, Yafei Wang, Xiuping Yang","doi":"10.1177/15533506241237141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the technique of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) has improved remarkably, problems such as limited exposure and instrument collision persist. We describe a new SILC technique that uses a set of specially-designed needle instruments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-six patients with benign gallbladder disease underwent SILC using the newly-designed needle assembly instruments (NAIs). The NAIs comprise an needle assembly exposing hook for operative field exposure and an needle assembly electrocoagulation hook for dissection. During the operation, the NAIs were assembled and disassembled before and after gallbladder removal within the abdominal cavity. The operative efficacy and postoperative complications of this procedure were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SILC was completed successfully in 52 cases, and four cases (7.14%) required an additional trocar. There were no conversions to open surgery. The mean operative time was 48.2 ± 21.8 min, and the mean operative bleeding volume was 10.5 ± 12.5 mL. Minor postoperative complications occurred in 3 cases, including 2 cases of localized fluid accumulation in the abdominal cavity and 1 case of pulmonary infection, and all of them recovered after conservative treatment. There was no occurrence of bile leak, abdominal bleeding, bile duct injury and incisional hernia. The medical cost of each case was saved by approximately $200. The abdominal scars produced by the needle instruments were negligible.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NAIs can make SILC safer, more convenient, and less expensive.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506241237141","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although the technique of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) has improved remarkably, problems such as limited exposure and instrument collision persist. We describe a new SILC technique that uses a set of specially-designed needle instruments.

Methods: Fifty-six patients with benign gallbladder disease underwent SILC using the newly-designed needle assembly instruments (NAIs). The NAIs comprise an needle assembly exposing hook for operative field exposure and an needle assembly electrocoagulation hook for dissection. During the operation, the NAIs were assembled and disassembled before and after gallbladder removal within the abdominal cavity. The operative efficacy and postoperative complications of this procedure were evaluated.

Results: SILC was completed successfully in 52 cases, and four cases (7.14%) required an additional trocar. There were no conversions to open surgery. The mean operative time was 48.2 ± 21.8 min, and the mean operative bleeding volume was 10.5 ± 12.5 mL. Minor postoperative complications occurred in 3 cases, including 2 cases of localized fluid accumulation in the abdominal cavity and 1 case of pulmonary infection, and all of them recovered after conservative treatment. There was no occurrence of bile leak, abdominal bleeding, bile duct injury and incisional hernia. The medical cost of each case was saved by approximately $200. The abdominal scars produced by the needle instruments were negligible.

Conclusion: NAIs can make SILC safer, more convenient, and less expensive.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用一套新型针式器械的单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术
背景:尽管单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)的技术已经有了显著的提高,但暴露受限和器械碰撞等问题依然存在。我们介绍了一种新的 SILC 技术,该技术使用一套专门设计的针状器械:方法:56 名良性胆囊疾病患者使用新设计的针组件器械(NAIs)接受了 SILC 手术。NAI包括用于手术视野暴露的针组件暴露钩和用于剥离的针组件电凝钩。手术过程中,NAI在腹腔内胆囊切除前后进行组装和拆卸。对该手术的疗效和术后并发症进行了评估:52例患者成功完成了SILC手术,4例患者(7.14%)需要额外的套管。没有患者转为开腹手术。平均手术时间为(48.2±21.8)分钟,平均手术出血量为(10.5±12.5)毫升。术后发生轻微并发症 3 例,其中 2 例为腹腔局部积液,1 例为肺部感染,均经保守治疗后痊愈。没有发生胆漏、腹腔出血、胆管损伤和切口疝。每例节省医疗费用约 200 美元。针刺器械造成的腹部疤痕微乎其微:结论:NAI 可使 SILC 更安全、更方便、更经济。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Surgical Innovation
Surgical Innovation 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Innovation (SRI) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal focusing on minimally invasive surgical techniques, new instruments such as laparoscopes and endoscopes, and new technologies. SRI prepares surgeons to think and work in "the operating room of the future" through learning new techniques, understanding and adapting to new technologies, maintaining surgical competencies, and applying surgical outcomes data to their practices. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
The Use of the Symani Surgical System® in Emergency Hand Trauma Care. A Prospective Study on a Suture Force Feedback Device for Training and Evaluating Junior Surgeons in Anastomotic Surgical Closure. The Reconstructive Metaverse - Collaboration in Real-Time Shared Mixed Reality Environments for Microsurgical Reconstruction. Patients Engaged in Losing Weight Preoperatively Experience Improved Outcomes After Hiatal Hernia Repair. Metrics for Success in a Surgical Innovation Fellowship.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1