首页 > 最新文献

Surgical Innovation最新文献

英文 中文
Joseph Pancoast (1805-1882) and His Innovations in Plastic Surgery. 约瑟夫-潘科斯特(1805-1882 年)和他在整形外科方面的创新。
IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-02 DOI: 10.1177/15533506241273340
Loukas Agorgianitis, Heleni Karassava, Evaggelos Mavrommatis

Background: Joseph Pancoast (1805-1882), a prominent figure in 19th-century surgery and medical education, introduced several innovative surgical techniques during his careerPurpose: While he made significant contributions to various areas of surgery, including plastic surgery and anatomy, his techniques were particularly notable for their precision and efficacy.Results: Some of his surgical innovations are the facial grafting especially in rhinoplasty either by using a forehead graft or by using a graft from the cheeks. He introduced his own operation for Staphyloplasty by dissecting two flaps of mucous membrane having a triangular shape and contributed also in taliacotian operation, blepharoplasty, otoplasty, cheiloplastic operation in case of lip cancer, amputations at the hip-joint, ocular deformities and tongue cancer restoration. In ocular surgery he had produced a fine needle turned into a hook in order to be inserted behind the cornea to cut deeply the soft parts of the lens and withdraw any hardened nucleus.

背景:约瑟夫-潘科斯特(Joseph Pancoast,1805-1882 年)是 19 世纪外科和医学教育领域的杰出人物,他在职业生涯中引入了多项创新的外科技术:他的一些手术创新包括面部移植,尤其是在鼻整形术中使用前额移植或脸颊移植。他还在距骨整形手术、眼睑整形手术、耳部整形手术、唇癌颧骨整形手术、髋关节截肢、眼部畸形和舌癌修复等方面做出了贡献。在眼科手术方面,他制作了一种细针,将其变成钩状,以便插入角膜后方,深入切下晶状体的软部,并取出任何硬核。
{"title":"Joseph Pancoast (1805-1882) and His Innovations in Plastic Surgery.","authors":"Loukas Agorgianitis, Heleni Karassava, Evaggelos Mavrommatis","doi":"10.1177/15533506241273340","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15533506241273340","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Joseph Pancoast (1805-1882), a prominent figure in 19th-century surgery and medical education, introduced several innovative surgical techniques during his career<b>Purpose:</b> While he made significant contributions to various areas of surgery, including plastic surgery and anatomy, his techniques were particularly notable for their precision and efficacy.<b>Results:</b> Some of his surgical innovations are the facial grafting especially in rhinoplasty either by using a forehead graft or by using a graft from the cheeks. He introduced his own operation for Staphyloplasty by dissecting two flaps of mucous membrane having a triangular shape and contributed also in taliacotian operation, blepharoplasty, otoplasty, cheiloplastic operation in case of lip cancer, amputations at the hip-joint, ocular deformities and tongue cancer restoration. In ocular surgery he had produced a fine needle turned into a hook in order to be inserted behind the cornea to cut deeply the soft parts of the lens and withdraw any hardened nucleus.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141879460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter re: Minimal Invasive Extended Crescent Innovative Approach for Impacted Teeth in Temporomandibular Joint Ankylosis -Triumph on Perilous Task. 关于:颞下颌关节强直症牙齿撞击的微创扩展新月形创新方法--危险任务中的胜利的信函。
IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-08 DOI: 10.1177/15533506241273372
Lakshmi Shetty, Anshuman Nautiyal, Abhirami Premarajan, Uday Londhe
{"title":"Letter re: Minimal Invasive Extended Crescent Innovative Approach for Impacted Teeth in Temporomandibular Joint Ankylosis -Triumph on Perilous Task.","authors":"Lakshmi Shetty, Anshuman Nautiyal, Abhirami Premarajan, Uday Londhe","doi":"10.1177/15533506241273372","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15533506241273372","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141907759","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Robotic Versus Conventional Completion Thyroidectomy: A 10-year Experience. 评估机器人与传统完整甲状腺切除术的有效性和安全性:十年经验。
IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-04 DOI: 10.1177/15533506241273345
Mohammad Hussein, Peter P Issa, Alexandra LaForteza, Mahmoud Omar, Brandon Magazine, Ali Abdelhady, Eslam Hossam, Mohamed Shama, Eman Toraih, Emad Kandil

Background: Robotic thyroidectomy is gaining popularity, yet its role in completion thyroidectomy remains unclear. We aimed to compare robotic vs conventional completion thyroidectomy for thyroid nodules.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed patients undergoing completion thyroidectomy from 2010-2020, either by conventional open technique (n = 87) or a robotic remote-access approach (n = 44). Outcomes were compared between groups.

Results: A total of 131 patients were included. The robotic cohort was younger (45.3 ± 14.0 vs 55.5 ± 14.5 years, P < 0.001) with a lower BMI (25.9 ± 5.5 vs 33.7 ± 7.8 kg/m2, P < 0.001). Operative time was longer for robotic procedures (139 min vs 99 min, P < 0.001). Hospital stay was shorter after robotic surgery, with 25% discharged the same day as compared to 5.7% in the open thyroidectomy cohort (P = 0.006). Overall rates of complication were comparable (P = 0.65). Transient recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy occurred in 4.6% of patients, which was similar between both cohorts (P = 0.66).

Conclusion: Robotic completion thyroidectomy appears safe and effective, achieving shorter hospitalization than conventional open approaches despite longer operative times. Appropriate patient selection and surgical technique optimization are key. Larger prospective studies should investigate costs and long-term patient-reported outcomes.

背景:机器人甲状腺切除术越来越受欢迎,但其在完成甲状腺切除术中的作用仍不明确。我们旨在比较机器人与传统的甲状腺结节完整切除术:这项回顾性研究分析了 2010-2020 年间接受完形甲状腺切除术的患者,他们分别采用了传统开放技术(87 人)或机器人远程入路方法(44 人)。结果:共纳入131名患者:结果:共纳入131名患者。机器人组患者年龄较小(45.3 ± 14.0 岁 vs 55.5 ± 14.5 岁,P < 0.001),体重指数较低(25.9 ± 5.5 vs 33.7 ± 7.8 kg/m2,P < 0.001)。机器人手术的手术时间更长(139 分钟 vs 99 分钟,P < 0.001)。机器人手术后的住院时间更短,25%的患者当天就能出院,而开放式甲状腺切除术队列中只有5.7%的患者当天就能出院(P = 0.006)。总体并发症发生率相当(P = 0.65)。4.6%的患者出现一过性喉返神经麻痹,两组患者的情况相似(P = 0.66):机器人完成甲状腺切除术似乎安全有效,尽管手术时间较长,但住院时间比传统开放式方法短。适当的患者选择和手术技术优化是关键。更大规模的前瞻性研究应调查成本和患者报告的长期疗效。
{"title":"Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Robotic Versus Conventional Completion Thyroidectomy: A 10-year Experience.","authors":"Mohammad Hussein, Peter P Issa, Alexandra LaForteza, Mahmoud Omar, Brandon Magazine, Ali Abdelhady, Eslam Hossam, Mohamed Shama, Eman Toraih, Emad Kandil","doi":"10.1177/15533506241273345","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15533506241273345","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robotic thyroidectomy is gaining popularity, yet its role in completion thyroidectomy remains unclear. We aimed to compare robotic vs conventional completion thyroidectomy for thyroid nodules.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed patients undergoing completion thyroidectomy from 2010-2020, either by conventional open technique (n = 87) or a robotic remote-access approach (n = 44). Outcomes were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 131 patients were included. The robotic cohort was younger (45.3 ± 14.0 vs 55.5 ± 14.5 years, <i>P</i> < 0.001) with a lower BMI (25.9 ± 5.5 vs 33.7 ± 7.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Operative time was longer for robotic procedures (139 min vs 99 min, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Hospital stay was shorter after robotic surgery, with 25% discharged the same day as compared to 5.7% in the open thyroidectomy cohort (<i>P</i> = 0.006). Overall rates of complication were comparable (<i>P</i> = 0.65). Transient recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy occurred in 4.6% of patients, which was similar between both cohorts (<i>P</i> = 0.66).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic completion thyroidectomy appears safe and effective, achieving shorter hospitalization than conventional open approaches despite longer operative times. Appropriate patient selection and surgical technique optimization are key. Larger prospective studies should investigate costs and long-term patient-reported outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141890100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Prospective Study on a Suture Force Feedback Device for Training and Evaluating Junior Surgeons in Anastomotic Surgical Closure. 一项关于缝合力反馈装置的前瞻性研究,用于培训和评估吻合口手术缝合的初级外科医生。
IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-21 DOI: 10.1177/15533506241264382
S Dinesh, S Poonguzhali, M Satish Devakumar, S Jeswanth

Background: Surgical reconstruction is a crucial stage in various surgeries, including pancreaticoduodenectomy, as it can significantly affect the surgical results. The objective was to design a suture force feedback (SFF) device that can precisely measure the suture force during surgical closures. Afterward, the device was used to train junior surgeons in surgical closure techniques.

Methods: The SFF was used to capture the suture force data of experienced surgeons. This data was utilized to train and assess junior surgeons. The SFF device had 2 tactile-based force sensors that measured the applied force. Whenever the applied force was not within the optimal force range, the device provided feedback to the surgeon. A workshop was conducted to train junior surgeons in surgical closure techniques to improve their suturing skills.

Results: Thirty-seven junior surgeons were enrolled in this training, of whom only 24 completed the 30-day training program. The pre-assessment results revealed that the force exerted by junior surgeons during suture knot-tying was uneven compared with that of the experienced surgeons, with a significant difference in the force exerted per knot throw (P = 0.005. Before the training program, junior surgeons applied a force of 3.89 ± 0.43 N, which was more than twice the force applied by experienced surgeons (1.75 ± 0.12 N). However, after completing the 30-day training program, their force improved to 2.35 ± 0.13 N.

Conclusions: The SFF device was shown to be an encouraging training tool for improving the surgical closure dexterity and technique of the participating junior surgeons.

背景:手术重建是包括胰十二指肠切除术在内的各种外科手术的关键阶段,因为它会对手术效果产生重大影响。研究的目的是设计一种缝合力反馈(SFF)装置,它能精确测量手术缝合时的缝合力。之后,利用该装置对初级外科医生进行手术缝合技术培训:方法:使用 SFF 采集经验丰富的外科医生的缝合力数据。方法:使用 SFF 采集经验丰富的外科医生的缝合力数据,并利用这些数据对初级外科医生进行培训和评估。SFF 设备有两个基于触觉的力传感器,用于测量施加的力。只要施力不在最佳施力范围内,设备就会向外科医生提供反馈。为了提高外科医生的缝合技术,我们举办了一个培训班,对外科医生进行手术缝合技术培训:37 名初级外科医生参加了培训,其中只有 24 人完成了为期 30 天的培训计划。培训前的评估结果显示,与经验丰富的外科医生相比,初级外科医生在缝合打结时用力不均匀,每次打结的用力差异显著(P = 0.005)。培训前,初级外科医生的施力为 3.89 ± 0.43 N,是经验丰富的外科医生施力(1.75 ± 0.12 N)的两倍多。然而,在完成 30 天的培训计划后,他们的施力提高到了 2.35 ± 0.13 N:事实证明,SFF 装置是一种令人鼓舞的培训工具,可提高参与培训的初级外科医生的手术闭合灵巧性和技术。
{"title":"A Prospective Study on a Suture Force Feedback Device for Training and Evaluating Junior Surgeons in Anastomotic Surgical Closure.","authors":"S Dinesh, S Poonguzhali, M Satish Devakumar, S Jeswanth","doi":"10.1177/15533506241264382","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15533506241264382","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical reconstruction is a crucial stage in various surgeries, including pancreaticoduodenectomy, as it can significantly affect the surgical results. The objective was to design a suture force feedback (SFF) device that can precisely measure the suture force during surgical closures. Afterward, the device was used to train junior surgeons in surgical closure techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The SFF was used to capture the suture force data of experienced surgeons. This data was utilized to train and assess junior surgeons. The SFF device had 2 tactile-based force sensors that measured the applied force. Whenever the applied force was not within the optimal force range, the device provided feedback to the surgeon. A workshop was conducted to train junior surgeons in surgical closure techniques to improve their suturing skills.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven junior surgeons were enrolled in this training, of whom only 24 completed the 30-day training program. The pre-assessment results revealed that the force exerted by junior surgeons during suture knot-tying was uneven compared with that of the experienced surgeons, with a significant difference in the force exerted per knot throw (<i>P</i> = 0.005. Before the training program, junior surgeons applied a force of 3.89 ± 0.43 N, which was more than twice the force applied by experienced surgeons (1.75 ± 0.12 N). However, after completing the 30-day training program, their force improved to 2.35 ± 0.13 N.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SFF device was shown to be an encouraging training tool for improving the surgical closure dexterity and technique of the participating junior surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141437570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Virtual Loupes: A Pilot Study on the Use of Video Passthrough Augmented Reality in Plastic Surgery. 虚拟放大镜:在整形外科中使用视频透视增强现实技术的试点研究。
IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-26 DOI: 10.1177/15533506241265544
Waylon Zeng, Cory Ilo, Douglas Bowman, James Thompson

Background: Plastic surgeons use loupes or operative microscope to aid in tissue dissection and anastomosis of structures. These devices have their own limitations in areas of visualization and weight. Current uses of augmented and virtual reality in surgery have been limited to operative planning and simulation. We present a proof of concept that harnesses video passthrough AR technology to augment the capabilities of loupes.

Methods: We first evaluated methods of gaze-based eye tracking to enable digital magnification. Using the Varjo XR-1 mixed reality headset, we compared discrete zoom through displayed pop-up menu vs continuous zoom through eye winking. Six participants were recruited to perform skin suturing simulation and completed a survey and interview. Next we assessed the performance and limitations of AR digital magnification. Varjo XR-3 was utilized to address the hardware limitations. Participants performed anastomotic suturing tasks with progressively finer suture, then completed a survey and interview.

Findings: There was no strong preference between zoom methods, although participants felt the discrete zoom was easier to use. Participants had difficulty determining depth and visualizing the suture due to limitations of digital magnification. Using Wilcoxon rank sum test to examine differences in system usability scale, the Phase 2 user experience had significant difference in percentile distribution (P 0.0390).

Conclusion: Virtual loupes may be a valuable tool for plastic surgeons, with potential for variable magnification and advanced visualization. Improvements in the hardware yielded higher ratings of system usability and user experience. Further development is needed to address the limitations of existing devices.

背景:整形外科医生使用放大镜或手术显微镜辅助组织解剖和结构吻合。这些设备在可视化和重量方面有其自身的局限性。目前,增强现实和虚拟现实技术在外科手术中的应用仅限于手术规划和模拟。我们提出了一个概念验证,利用视频直通 AR 技术来增强放大镜的功能:我们首先评估了基于凝视的眼球跟踪方法,以实现数字放大。我们使用 Varjo XR-1 混合现实耳机,比较了通过显示弹出式菜单进行离散放大与通过眨眼进行连续放大的效果。我们招募了六名参与者进行皮肤缝合模拟,并完成了调查和访谈。接下来,我们评估了 AR 数字放大的性能和局限性。我们使用了 Varjo XR-3 来解决硬件限制问题。参试者用逐渐变细的缝线完成了吻合缝合任务,然后完成了调查和访谈:尽管参与者认为离散变焦更易于使用,但他们对变焦方法并无强烈偏好。由于数字放大倍率的限制,参与者在确定深度和可视化缝合时遇到了困难。使用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验来检查系统可用性量表的差异,第二阶段的用户体验在百分位数分布上有显著差异(P 0.0390):虚拟放大镜可能是整形外科医生的重要工具,具有可变放大率和高级可视化的潜力。硬件的改进提高了系统可用性和用户体验的评分。需要进一步开发以解决现有设备的局限性。
{"title":"Virtual Loupes: A Pilot Study on the Use of Video Passthrough Augmented Reality in Plastic Surgery.","authors":"Waylon Zeng, Cory Ilo, Douglas Bowman, James Thompson","doi":"10.1177/15533506241265544","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15533506241265544","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Plastic surgeons use loupes or operative microscope to aid in tissue dissection and anastomosis of structures. These devices have their own limitations in areas of visualization and weight. Current uses of augmented and virtual reality in surgery have been limited to operative planning and simulation. We present a proof of concept that harnesses video passthrough AR technology to augment the capabilities of loupes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We first evaluated methods of gaze-based eye tracking to enable digital magnification. Using the Varjo XR-1 mixed reality headset, we compared discrete zoom through displayed pop-up menu vs continuous zoom through eye winking. Six participants were recruited to perform skin suturing simulation and completed a survey and interview. Next we assessed the performance and limitations of AR digital magnification. Varjo XR-3 was utilized to address the hardware limitations. Participants performed anastomotic suturing tasks with progressively finer suture, then completed a survey and interview.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>There was no strong preference between zoom methods, although participants felt the discrete zoom was easier to use. Participants had difficulty determining depth and visualizing the suture due to limitations of digital magnification. Using Wilcoxon rank sum test to examine differences in system usability scale, the Phase 2 user experience had significant difference in percentile distribution (<i>P</i> 0.0390).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Virtual loupes may be a valuable tool for plastic surgeons, with potential for variable magnification and advanced visualization. Improvements in the hardware yielded higher ratings of system usability and user experience. Further development is needed to address the limitations of existing devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141767505","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Recurrence Rates after Primary Femoral Hernia Open Repair a Systematic Review. 原发性股骨疝开放性修复术后的复发率系统回顾
IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-03 DOI: 10.1177/15533506241273398
Lucia Romano, Fabiana Fiasca, Antonella Mattei, Giada Di Donato, Andrea Venturoni, Mario Schietroma, Antonio Giuliani

Purpose: Femoral hernia accounts for 22% of groin hernia operations in women and for 1.1% in men. Numerous surgical approaches have been reported but there is no consensus. Many of the recurrence rates are reported in old literature, while recent reports are scarce. The aim of the present study was to review rates of recurrences in patients who underwent open repair of a primary femoral hernia.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search in the electronic literature, using the search terms "femoral hernia" and "recurrence". We included studies published from 2002 that had as primary or secondary endpoint to evaluate the recurrence after surgery. Risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCT and by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies.

Results: Fifteen eligible articles were included in our systematic review. A total of 1087 procedures were performed according to the defined criteria. The metanalytic evaluation highlighted a higher probability of recurrence for non-mesh than mesh repairs (6.5% vs 1.9%; RR 0.924, 95% CI: 0.857 - 0.996). In patients treated in emergency settings the rate of recurrences was 3.7%; in patients who received elective repairs it was 0.71%. Six studies reported that most of recurrences occurred within the first post-operative year.

Conclusion: We found that crude recurrence rate after open repair of a primary femoral hernia is about 4%. This rate is higher in case of non-mesh techniques and in emergency surgery. Our results support the recommendation that femoral hernias should be repaired with mesh techniques.

目的:股疝占女性腹股沟疝手术的 22%,占男性腹股沟疝手术的 1.1%。已有许多手术方法的报道,但尚未达成共识。许多关于复发率的报道都来自于旧文献,而近期的报道却很少。本研究旨在回顾原发性股疝开放性修补术患者的复发率:我们使用 "股疝 "和 "复发 "这两个检索词对电子文献进行了系统检索。我们纳入了 2002 年以来发表的、以评估术后复发为主要或次要终点的研究。对于RCT研究,我们使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险;对于队列研究,我们使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估偏倚风险:结果:15 篇符合条件的文章被纳入我们的系统综述。根据规定的标准,共进行了 1087 例手术。荟萃分析评估结果表明,非网眼修复术的复发概率高于网眼修复术(6.5% vs 1.9%; RR 0.924, 95% CI: 0.857 - 0.996)。在急诊治疗的患者中,复发率为 3.7%;在接受择期修复的患者中,复发率为 0.71%。六项研究报告称,大多数复发发生在术后第一年内:我们发现,原发性股疝开放性修补术后的粗复发率约为 4%。结论:我们发现,原发性股疝开放性修补术后的粗复发率约为 4%,采用无网膜技术和急诊手术的复发率更高。我们的研究结果支持应使用网片技术修复股骨疝的建议。
{"title":"Recurrence Rates after Primary Femoral Hernia Open Repair a Systematic Review.","authors":"Lucia Romano, Fabiana Fiasca, Antonella Mattei, Giada Di Donato, Andrea Venturoni, Mario Schietroma, Antonio Giuliani","doi":"10.1177/15533506241273398","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15533506241273398","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Femoral hernia accounts for 22% of groin hernia operations in women and for 1.1% in men. Numerous surgical approaches have been reported but there is no consensus. Many of the recurrence rates are reported in old literature, while recent reports are scarce. The aim of the present study was to review rates of recurrences in patients who underwent open repair of a primary femoral hernia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search in the electronic literature, using the search terms \"femoral hernia\" and \"recurrence\". We included studies published from 2002 that had as primary or secondary endpoint to evaluate the recurrence after surgery. Risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCT and by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen eligible articles were included in our systematic review. A total of 1087 procedures were performed according to the defined criteria. The metanalytic evaluation highlighted a higher probability of recurrence for non-mesh than mesh repairs (6.5% vs 1.9%; RR 0.924, 95% CI: 0.857 - 0.996). In patients treated in emergency settings the rate of recurrences was 3.7%; in patients who received elective repairs it was 0.71%. Six studies reported that most of recurrences occurred within the first post-operative year.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that crude recurrence rate after open repair of a primary femoral hernia is about 4%. This rate is higher in case of non-mesh techniques and in emergency surgery. Our results support the recommendation that femoral hernias should be repaired with mesh techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141879498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Initial Experience With Ultra-High-Definition 3D Exoscope in Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery. 在甲状腺和甲状旁腺手术中使用超高清 3D 外窥镜的初步经验。
IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-04 DOI: 10.1177/15533506241273334
Steen Bernes, Jacob Lilja-Fischer, Niels Krintel Petersen, Nichlas Udholm, Kasper Basse Reinholdt, Stefano Londero, Thomas Kjærgaard, Lars Rolighed

Background: Operation with a 3D exoscope has recently been introduced in clinical practice. The exoscope consists of two cameras placed in front of the operative field. Images are shown on a large 3D screen with high resolution. The system can be used to enhance precise dissection and provides new possibilities for improved ergonomics, fluorescence, and other optical-guided modalities.

Methods: Initial experience with the ultra-high-definition (4K) 3D exoscope in thyroid and parathyroid operations. The exoscope (OrbEyeTM) was mounted on a holding system (Olympus).

Results: We used the exoscope in parathyroidectomy (N = 6) and thyroidectomy (N = 6). Immediate advantages and disadvantages were discussed and recorded. The learning curve for use of the exoscope may be shorter for surgeons with training in endoscopic or robotic procedures. There may be improved ergonomics compared with normal open-neck operations. Further, the optical guided operations can be used with fluorescence and have potential for different on-lay techniques in the future. The 4 K 3D image quality is state-of-art and is highly appreciated during fine surgical dissection and eliminates the need for loupes.

Conclusion: In several ways, using the ORBEYE™ in thyroid and parathyroid surgery provides the surgical team with a new and enhanced experience. This includes improved possibility for teaching, surgical ergonomics, and a 4K 3D camera with a powerful magnification system. However, it is not clear if utilization of these features would improve surgical outcomes. Furthermore, the ORBEYE™ lacks incorporation of parathyroid autofluorescence, and the current costs for the system do not facilitate general access to exoscope assisted operations.

背景:最近,临床上开始使用三维外窥镜进行手术。外窥镜由放置在手术区域前方的两个摄像头组成。图像显示在高分辨率的 3D 大屏幕上。该系统可用于加强精确解剖,并为改善人体工程学、荧光和其他光学引导方式提供了新的可能性:在甲状腺和甲状旁腺手术中使用超高清(4K)3D 外窥镜的初步经验。外窥镜(OrbEyeTM)安装在固定系统(奥林巴斯)上:结果:我们在甲状旁腺切除术(6 例)和甲状腺切除术(6 例)中使用了外窥镜。结果:我们在甲状旁腺切除术(6 例)和甲状腺切除术(6 例)中使用了外窥镜,并讨论和记录了其直接利弊。对于接受过内窥镜或机器人手术培训的外科医生来说,使用外窥镜的学习曲线可能更短。与普通开颈手术相比,人体工程学设计可能会有所改进。此外,光学引导手术可与荧光技术一起使用,并有可能在未来用于不同的铺设技术。4 K 三维图像质量达到了最先进的水平,在精细手术解剖时非常受欢迎,而且无需使用放大镜:在甲状腺和甲状旁腺手术中使用 ORBEYE™ 在多个方面为手术团队带来了全新的体验。这包括教学、手术人体工学和带有强大放大系统的 4K 3D 摄像头等方面的改进。不过,目前还不清楚使用这些功能是否能改善手术效果。此外,ORBEYE™ 没有加入甲状旁腺自动荧光功能,而且该系统目前的成本也不利于外窥镜辅助手术的普及。
{"title":"Initial Experience With Ultra-High-Definition 3D Exoscope in Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery.","authors":"Steen Bernes, Jacob Lilja-Fischer, Niels Krintel Petersen, Nichlas Udholm, Kasper Basse Reinholdt, Stefano Londero, Thomas Kjærgaard, Lars Rolighed","doi":"10.1177/15533506241273334","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15533506241273334","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Operation with a 3D exoscope has recently been introduced in clinical practice. The exoscope consists of two cameras placed in front of the operative field. Images are shown on a large 3D screen with high resolution. The system can be used to enhance precise dissection and provides new possibilities for improved ergonomics, fluorescence, and other optical-guided modalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Initial experience with the ultra-high-definition (4K) 3D exoscope in thyroid and parathyroid operations. The exoscope (OrbEye<sup>TM</sup>) was mounted on a holding system (Olympus).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We used the exoscope in parathyroidectomy (N = 6) and thyroidectomy (N = 6). Immediate advantages and disadvantages were discussed and recorded. The learning curve for use of the exoscope may be shorter for surgeons with training in endoscopic or robotic procedures. There may be improved ergonomics compared with normal open-neck operations. Further, the optical guided operations can be used with fluorescence and have potential for different on-lay techniques in the future. The 4 K 3D image quality is state-of-art and is highly appreciated during fine surgical dissection and eliminates the need for loupes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In several ways, using the ORBEYE™ in thyroid and parathyroid surgery provides the surgical team with a new and enhanced experience. This includes improved possibility for teaching, surgical ergonomics, and a 4K 3D camera with a powerful magnification system. However, it is not clear if utilization of these features would improve surgical outcomes. Furthermore, the ORBEYE™ lacks incorporation of parathyroid autofluorescence, and the current costs for the system do not facilitate general access to exoscope assisted operations.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141890101","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Laparoscopic Versus Open Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Propensity-Score Matched Studies. 腹腔镜与开腹肾切除术治疗上尿路上皮癌:倾向分数匹配研究的系统回顾与 Meta 分析。
IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-05 DOI: 10.1177/15533506241273378
Shidong Deng, Lingzhi Liu, Yurou Wang, Chuan Zhou, Huihui Zhang

Background: The effectiveness of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) vs open nephroureterectomy (ONU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is unclear.

Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of studies based on propensity score-matched cohorts to compare the surgical and oncological outcomes of LNU and ONU in UTUC patients. A literature search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library until July 12, 2023. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was utilized to assess the quality of eligible studies. Measurements of surgical and oncological outcomes were extracted and pooled including mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR), hazard ratios (HR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: Five high-quality retrospective studies were included, totaling 6422 patients; 2080 (32.4%) underwent LNU, and 4342 (67.6%) underwent ONU. With respect to surgical outcomes, patients in the LNU group experienced less estimated blood loss and had shorter hospital stay than those in the ONU group, but there was no significant difference in complication rates and operation time. In regard to oncological outcomes, there were no significant differences between the LNU and ONU groups in 3-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). However, 3-year intravesical recurrence free survival (IVRFS) was worse in the LNU group compared to the ONU group.

Conclusion: LNU was associated with less estimated blood loss and shorter hospital stays than ONU, but there were no differences in OS and CSS between the surgical modalities. Nonetheless, LNU might result in poorer IVRFS than ONU.

背景:腹腔镜肾切除术(LNU)与开腹肾切除术(ONU)治疗上尿路上皮癌(UTUC)的有效性尚不明确:我们对基于倾向评分匹配队列的研究进行了荟萃分析,以比较 LNU 和 ONU 对 UTUC 患者的手术和肿瘤治疗效果。在PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆进行了文献检索,直至2023年7月12日。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估符合条件的研究质量。提取并汇总了手术和肿瘤结果的测量值,包括平均差(MD)、风险比(RR)、危险比(HR)和 95% 置信区间(CI):共纳入了五项高质量的回顾性研究,共计6422名患者;其中2080人(32.4%)接受了LNU治疗,4342人(67.6%)接受了ONU治疗。在手术结果方面,LNU组患者的估计失血量比ONU组少,住院时间短,但并发症发生率和手术时间没有显著差异。在肿瘤结果方面,LNU 组和 ONU 组的 3 年总生存率(OS)和癌症特异性生存率(CSS)没有明显差异。然而,与ONU组相比,LNU组的3年无膀胱内复发生存率(IVRFS)更低:结论:与ONU相比,LNU的估计失血量更少,住院时间更短,但两种手术方式的OS和CSS没有差异。尽管如此,LNU可能比ONU导致更差的IVRFS。
{"title":"Laparoscopic Versus Open Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Propensity-Score Matched Studies.","authors":"Shidong Deng, Lingzhi Liu, Yurou Wang, Chuan Zhou, Huihui Zhang","doi":"10.1177/15533506241273378","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15533506241273378","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effectiveness of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) vs open nephroureterectomy (ONU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a meta-analysis of studies based on propensity score-matched cohorts to compare the surgical and oncological outcomes of LNU and ONU in UTUC patients. A literature search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library until July 12, 2023. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was utilized to assess the quality of eligible studies. Measurements of surgical and oncological outcomes were extracted and pooled including mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR), hazard ratios (HR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five high-quality retrospective studies were included, totaling 6422 patients; 2080 (32.4%) underwent LNU, and 4342 (67.6%) underwent ONU. With respect to surgical outcomes, patients in the LNU group experienced less estimated blood loss and had shorter hospital stay than those in the ONU group, but there was no significant difference in complication rates and operation time. In regard to oncological outcomes, there were no significant differences between the LNU and ONU groups in 3-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). However, 3-year intravesical recurrence free survival (IVRFS) was worse in the LNU group compared to the ONU group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LNU was associated with less estimated blood loss and shorter hospital stays than ONU, but there were no differences in OS and CSS between the surgical modalities. Nonetheless, LNU might result in poorer IVRFS than ONU.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141890102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patients Engaged in Losing Weight Preoperatively Experience Improved Outcomes After Hiatal Hernia Repair. 术前减肥的患者贲门疝修补术后效果更好
IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-22 DOI: 10.1177/15533506241264371
Justin J Turcotte, Yu-Wei W Chang, Adrian E Park

Background: Adherence to preoperative weight loss recommendations may serve as a surrogate for the level of engagement in hiatal hernia (HH) patients. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between achieving preoperative weight loss goals and outcomes after HH repair.

Methods: A retrospective review of 235 patients undergoing laparoscopic HH repair at a single institution was performed. Patients were grouped based on the percentage of weight loss goal achieved. Low achievement was defined as the bottom quartile of goal achievement (≤75%); high achievement was defined as the top quartile (≥140%). Baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes, and patient reported outcomes (PROMs) were compared between groups.

Results: 131/235 (55.7%) achieved their weight loss goal. No differences in baseline characteristics or clinical outcomes were observed between the low and high achievement groups. While both groups experienced improvements in PROMs postoperatively, patients in the high achievement group demonstrated significantly lower symptom burden at one-month postoperatively. Further, high-achievement patients were more likely to experience complete resolution of common HH symptoms at one-month postoperatively, including no difficulty swallowing food, no breathing difficulties or choking episodes, no choking when eating food, no choking when drinking liquid, and no regurgitation of food or liquid.

Conclusions: In patients undergoing laparoscopic HH repair, patients achieving their preoperative weight loss goals experienced less overall symptom burden and lower prevalence of common symptoms one-month postoperatively than those with low levels of goal achievement. These results demonstrate that patients can take an active role in improving their own surgical outcomes and health status.

背景:坚持术前减肥建议可作为食管裂孔疝(HH)患者参与程度的替代指标。本研究旨在评估实现术前减肥目标与 HH 修复术后效果之间的关系:方法:对在一家医疗机构接受腹腔镜 HH 修复术的 235 名患者进行了回顾性研究。根据实现减重目标的百分比对患者进行分组。目标达成率低的定义为目标达成率的下四分位数(≤75%);目标达成率高的定义为目标达成率的上四分位数(≥140%)。对各组的基线特征、临床结果和患者报告结果(PROMs)进行了比较:结果:131/235(55.7%)人实现了减肥目标。在基线特征或临床结果方面,低达成率组和高达成率组之间没有发现差异。虽然两组患者术后的 PROMs 都有所改善,但高成就组患者术后一个月的症状负担明显减轻。此外,高成就患者更有可能在术后一个月完全消除常见的HH症状,包括吞咽食物无困难、无呼吸困难或呛咳发作、进食时无呛咳、饮用液体时无呛咳、无食物或液体反流:结论:在接受腹腔镜 HH 修复术的患者中,达到术前减肥目标的患者术后一个月的总体症状负担较轻,常见症状的发生率也较低。这些结果表明,患者可以在改善自身手术效果和健康状况方面发挥积极作用。
{"title":"Patients Engaged in Losing Weight Preoperatively Experience Improved Outcomes After Hiatal Hernia Repair.","authors":"Justin J Turcotte, Yu-Wei W Chang, Adrian E Park","doi":"10.1177/15533506241264371","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15533506241264371","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adherence to preoperative weight loss recommendations may serve as a surrogate for the level of engagement in hiatal hernia (HH) patients. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between achieving preoperative weight loss goals and outcomes after HH repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of 235 patients undergoing laparoscopic HH repair at a single institution was performed. Patients were grouped based on the percentage of weight loss goal achieved. Low achievement was defined as the bottom quartile of goal achievement (≤75%); high achievement was defined as the top quartile (≥140%). Baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes, and patient reported outcomes (PROMs) were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>131/235 (55.7%) achieved their weight loss goal. No differences in baseline characteristics or clinical outcomes were observed between the low and high achievement groups. While both groups experienced improvements in PROMs postoperatively, patients in the high achievement group demonstrated significantly lower symptom burden at one-month postoperatively. Further, high-achievement patients were more likely to experience complete resolution of common HH symptoms at one-month postoperatively, including no difficulty swallowing food, no breathing difficulties or choking episodes, no choking when eating food, no choking when drinking liquid, and no regurgitation of food or liquid.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients undergoing laparoscopic HH repair, patients achieving their preoperative weight loss goals experienced less overall symptom burden and lower prevalence of common symptoms one-month postoperatively than those with low levels of goal achievement. These results demonstrate that patients can take an active role in improving their own surgical outcomes and health status.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141440906","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Smart Glasses in Surgery: The Theatre and Beyond. 手术中的智能眼镜:手术室及其他
IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-21 DOI: 10.1177/15533506241265274
Syama Gollapalli, Vidushi Sharma, Adel Al Ghazwi, Leonie Heskin

Aims & objectives: The primary aim of this paper is to determine whether smart glasses or head-mounted displays improve efficiency in a procedural or theatre setting without compromising the quality of the procedure performed. Additionally, this paper aims to qualitatively explore applications in surgical education, whilst on-call, consulting and patient observation.

Design: This paper is a systematic review of the literature available on the topic of smart glasses or head-mounted displays in surgical or procedural settings.

Methods: A search of Pubmed, Cochrane and the Wiley Online Library was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Procedural times and adverse outcomes were compared between the smart glass and non-smart glass groups in each of the quantitative studies. A literature review of studies, including those not satisfying the primary aim was conducted and is included in this paper.

Results: 32 studies were identified that complied with the inclusion criteria of this paper. 8 of these studies focused on procedural times and adverse outcomes, with and without smart glass usage. Procedural time was reduced when smart glass technology was used, without an increase in adverse patient outcomes.

Conclusions: Surgeons should consider whether the relatively short reduction in procedural time is worth the high cost, privacy issues, battery complaints and user discomfort involved with these devices. There are promising applications of this technology in the areas of surgical education and consultation. However, more trials are necessary to assess the value of using smart glasses in these settings.

目的与目标:本文的主要目的是确定智能眼镜或头戴式显示器是否能在不影响手术质量的前提下提高手术或手术室环境的效率。此外,本文还旨在定性地探讨智能眼镜在外科教育、值班、咨询和病人观察中的应用:本文是对智能眼镜或头戴式显示器在外科或手术环境中的应用相关文献的系统性综述:方法:根据PRISMA指南,对Pubmed、Cochrane和Wiley在线图书馆进行了检索。在每项定量研究中,比较了智能玻璃组和非智能玻璃组的手术时间和不良后果。本文还对各项研究进行了文献综述,包括那些不符合主要目的的研究:结果:共发现 32 项研究符合本文的纳入标准。其中 8 项研究重点关注了使用和不使用智能玻璃的手术时间和不良后果。使用智能玻璃技术后,手术时间缩短了,但患者的不良后果没有增加:外科医生应该考虑,相对较短的手术时间减少是否值得这些设备的高成本、隐私问题、电池投诉和用户不适。这项技术在外科教育和咨询领域的应用前景广阔。不过,有必要进行更多试验,以评估在这些场合使用智能眼镜的价值。
{"title":"Smart Glasses in Surgery: The Theatre and Beyond.","authors":"Syama Gollapalli, Vidushi Sharma, Adel Al Ghazwi, Leonie Heskin","doi":"10.1177/15533506241265274","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15533506241265274","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims & objectives: </strong>The primary aim of this paper is to determine whether smart glasses or head-mounted displays improve efficiency in a procedural or theatre setting without compromising the quality of the procedure performed. Additionally, this paper aims to qualitatively explore applications in surgical education, whilst on-call, consulting and patient observation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This paper is a systematic review of the literature available on the topic of smart glasses or head-mounted displays in surgical or procedural settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search of Pubmed, Cochrane and the Wiley Online Library was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Procedural times and adverse outcomes were compared between the smart glass and non-smart glass groups in each of the quantitative studies. A literature review of studies, including those not satisfying the primary aim was conducted and is included in this paper.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>32 studies were identified that complied with the inclusion criteria of this paper. 8 of these studies focused on procedural times and adverse outcomes, with and without smart glass usage. Procedural time was reduced when smart glass technology was used, without an increase in adverse patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgeons should consider whether the relatively short reduction in procedural time is worth the high cost, privacy issues, battery complaints and user discomfort involved with these devices. There are promising applications of this technology in the areas of surgical education and consultation. However, more trials are necessary to assess the value of using smart glasses in these settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141734979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Surgical Innovation
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1