Quantifying hominin morphological diversity at the end of the middle Pleistocene: Implications for the origin of Homo sapiens

IF 1.7 2区 生物学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY American Journal of Biological Anthropology Pub Date : 2024-03-06 DOI:10.1002/ajpa.24915
Hugo Hautavoine, Julie Arnaud, Antoine Balzeau, Aurélien Mounier
{"title":"Quantifying hominin morphological diversity at the end of the middle Pleistocene: Implications for the origin of Homo sapiens","authors":"Hugo Hautavoine,&nbsp;Julie Arnaud,&nbsp;Antoine Balzeau,&nbsp;Aurélien Mounier","doi":"10.1002/ajpa.24915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The Middle Pleistocene (MP) saw the emergence of new species of hominins: <i>Homo sapiens</i> in Africa, <i>H. neanderthalensis,</i> and possibly Denisovans in Eurasia, whose most recent common ancestor is thought to have lived in Africa around 600 ka ago. However, hominin remains from this period present a wide range of morphological variation making it difficult to securely determine their taxonomic attribution and their phylogenetic position within the <i>Homo</i> genus. This study proposes to reconsider the phenetic relationships between MP hominin fossils in order to clarify evolutionary trends and contacts between the populations they represent.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We used a Geometric Morphometrics approach to quantify the morphological variation of the calvarium of controversial MP specimens from Africa and Eurasia by using a comparative sample that can be divided into 5 groups: <i>H. ergaster</i>, <i>H. erectus</i>, <i>H. neanderthalensis</i>, and <i>H. sapiens</i>, as well as individuals from current modern human populations. We performed a Generalized Procrustes Analysis, a Principal Component Analysis, and Multinomial Principal Component Logistic Regressions to determine the phenetic affinities of the controversial Middle Pleistocene specimens with the other groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>MP African and Eurasian specimens represent several populations, some of which show strong affinities with <i>H. neanderthalensis</i> in Europe or <i>H. sapiens</i> in Africa, others presenting multiple affinities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>These MP populations might have contributed to the emergence of these two species in different proportions. This study proposes a new framework for the human evolutionary history during the MP.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":29759,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Biological Anthropology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajpa.24915","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Biological Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajpa.24915","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The Middle Pleistocene (MP) saw the emergence of new species of hominins: Homo sapiens in Africa, H. neanderthalensis, and possibly Denisovans in Eurasia, whose most recent common ancestor is thought to have lived in Africa around 600 ka ago. However, hominin remains from this period present a wide range of morphological variation making it difficult to securely determine their taxonomic attribution and their phylogenetic position within the Homo genus. This study proposes to reconsider the phenetic relationships between MP hominin fossils in order to clarify evolutionary trends and contacts between the populations they represent.

Materials and Methods

We used a Geometric Morphometrics approach to quantify the morphological variation of the calvarium of controversial MP specimens from Africa and Eurasia by using a comparative sample that can be divided into 5 groups: H. ergaster, H. erectus, H. neanderthalensis, and H. sapiens, as well as individuals from current modern human populations. We performed a Generalized Procrustes Analysis, a Principal Component Analysis, and Multinomial Principal Component Logistic Regressions to determine the phenetic affinities of the controversial Middle Pleistocene specimens with the other groups.

Results

MP African and Eurasian specimens represent several populations, some of which show strong affinities with H. neanderthalensis in Europe or H. sapiens in Africa, others presenting multiple affinities.

Discussion

These MP populations might have contributed to the emergence of these two species in different proportions. This study proposes a new framework for the human evolutionary history during the MP.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
量化中更新世末期的类人形态多样性:对智人起源的影响。
目的:中更新世(MP)时期出现了新的类人物种:非洲的智人(Homo sapiens)、尼安德特人(H. neanderthalensis),可能还有欧亚大陆的丹尼索瓦人(Denisovans)。然而,这一时期的智人遗骸形态差异很大,因此很难确定它们在分类学上的归属及其在智人属中的系统发育位置。本研究建议重新考虑 MP 类人化石之间的表型关系,以明确它们所代表的种群之间的进化趋势和联系:我们采用几何形态计量学方法,对非洲和欧亚大陆有争议的 MP 标本的颅骨形态变异进行量化,比较样本可分为 5 组:H. ergaster、H. erectus、H. neanderthalensis 和 H. sapiens,以及来自当前现代人种群的个体。我们进行了广义普氏分析、主成分分析和多项式主成分逻辑回归,以确定有争议的中更新世标本与其他组别的表型亲缘关系:结果:中更新世的非洲和欧亚标本代表了几个种群,其中一些与欧洲的尼安德特人或非洲的智人有很强的亲缘关系,另一些则具有多种亲缘关系:讨论:这些 MP 种群可能以不同的比例促成了这两个物种的出现。本研究为MP时期的人类进化史提出了一个新的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The intersectional effects of sex and socioeconomic status on risk of mortality in industrializing England. Dying of pestilence: Stature and mortality from the Black Death in 14th-century Kyrgyzstan. Technical note: Does scan resolution or downsampling impact the analysis of trabecular bone architecture? Evolutionary selection and morphological integration in the hand of modern humans. "How Handy was early hominin 'know-how'?" An experimental approach exploring efficient early stone tool use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1