Arthur Miller's Suicidology of the Stage: Suicide and Dramatic Form in Death of a Salesman

IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 THEATER COMPARATIVE DRAMA Pub Date : 2024-03-06 DOI:10.1353/cdr.2024.a920785
Nicholas Duddy
{"title":"Arthur Miller's Suicidology of the Stage: Suicide and Dramatic Form in Death of a Salesman","authors":"Nicholas Duddy","doi":"10.1353/cdr.2024.a920785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Arthur Miller's Suicidology of the Stage:<span>Suicide and Dramatic Form in <em>Death of a Salesman</em></span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Nicholas Duddy (bio) </li> </ul> <p>On August 5, 1962, the body of Marilyn Monroe, Arthur Miller's exwife, was found in the bedroom of her Brentwood home. Tangled bedsheets, bottles of pills, a rotary phone receiver by her hand—the room resembled the mise-en-scène of a murder mystery, and in death the cultural icon received just as much attention as in life.<sup>1</sup> Newspapers across the world announced her death with front page headlines that were both equivocal and sensational: \"Marilyn Dead\" (<em>Daily News</em>), \"Marilyn Phone Riddle\" (<em>Daily Express</em>), \"Marilyn Monroe Kills Self: Found Nude in Bed … Hand On Phone … Took 40 Pills\" (<em>New York Mirror</em>).<sup>2</sup></p> <p>Less than two weeks later, Los Angeles County Coroner Theodore Curphey, clad in a white lab coat, cigar in mouth, sat before a room of reporters to announce the findings of his inquest. He prefaced his ruling with a public appeal:</p> <blockquote> <p>Ladies and gentlemen, I must be frank to state that in seeking in my own mind any justification for this conference the most impelling reason that occurred to me is the importance of recognizing that in the death of Marilyn Monroe she has unwittingly and unfortunately played the greatest role of her career in focusing the attention of every one of us living on the gravity of a worldwide problem that bathetically cries out for a solution.<sup>3</sup></p> </blockquote> <p>Sitting beside Curphey were two men, psychologist Norman Farberow and psychiatrist Robert Litman, who had helped the coroner reach the verdict of a \"probable suicide\" by performing a \"psychological autopsy\" on Monroe, studying her lifestyle, behavior, and character traits to uncover her suicidal state of mind.<sup>4</sup> Solemn in their black suits, Farberow and <strong>[End Page 33]</strong> Litman fielded questions from the press about Monroe's final moments. \"The only conclusion we could reach was suicide,\" Litman stated. \"Or at least a gamble with death.\"<sup>5</sup></p> <p>Farberow and Litman had developed this method of psychological enquiry while working with Edwin Shneidman at the Los Angeles Suicide Prevention Center, an organization established just four years earlier as a clinical practice, public health agency, and research site into suicide. The Center's origins, though, date to 1949, the year <em>Death of a Salesman</em> opened in Broadway's Morosco Theatre. While Miller refined <em>Salesman</em>'s production script, Shneidman, who would later be considered \"a father of contemporary suicidology,\" analyzed 721 suicide notes pulled from a coroner's vault and compared them in a blind test to simulated notes written by non-suicidal individuals.<sup>6</sup> This systematic study became a seminal development in the emerging discipline of \"suicidology,\" \"the scientific study of suicidal phenomena.\"<sup>7</sup> And it is this investigation into Monroe's death, an infamous event in twentieth-century history, and a seminal moment in the contemporary study of suicide, that represents the nexus between Miller and Shneidman, the playwright and the psychologist, two men preoccupied with understanding suicidal experience.</p> <p>Although working in different fields, Miller's and Shneidman's approaches to suicide reflected a similar interest in the circumstances and motivations driving an individual to death. Born in 1915 and 1918 respectively, Miller and Shneidman came of age during the Great Depression, an event that saw the American suicide rate increase by over twenty percent.<sup>8</sup> As college students, both men expressed an interest in the connection between literature and psychology: Miller, an English major, took a sophomore psychology course with Walter Bowers Pillsbury at the University of Michigan; Shneidman, a Psychology major, took a sophomore American literature course with George Shelton Hubbell at the University of California Los Angeles.<sup>9</sup> Over their careers, they gravitated towards literature that probed the human psyche. Miller cited the experience of reading Dostoevsky—whose four great novels <em>Crime and Punishment</em> (1866), <em>The Idiot</em> (1869), <em>Demons</em> (1872), and <em>The Brothers Karamazov</em> (1880) delve into suicidal psychology, what the Russian writer called \"the dreadful question of our age\"—while a high <strong>[End Page 34]</strong> school senior as the moment when \"I knew that I had to be a writer.\"<sup>10</sup> Shneidman, too, believed \"the world's greatest psychologists are not Wundt or Titchener or...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":39600,"journal":{"name":"COMPARATIVE DRAMA","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMPARATIVE DRAMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cdr.2024.a920785","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Arthur Miller's Suicidology of the Stage:Suicide and Dramatic Form in Death of a Salesman
  • Nicholas Duddy (bio)

On August 5, 1962, the body of Marilyn Monroe, Arthur Miller's exwife, was found in the bedroom of her Brentwood home. Tangled bedsheets, bottles of pills, a rotary phone receiver by her hand—the room resembled the mise-en-scène of a murder mystery, and in death the cultural icon received just as much attention as in life.1 Newspapers across the world announced her death with front page headlines that were both equivocal and sensational: "Marilyn Dead" (Daily News), "Marilyn Phone Riddle" (Daily Express), "Marilyn Monroe Kills Self: Found Nude in Bed … Hand On Phone … Took 40 Pills" (New York Mirror).2

Less than two weeks later, Los Angeles County Coroner Theodore Curphey, clad in a white lab coat, cigar in mouth, sat before a room of reporters to announce the findings of his inquest. He prefaced his ruling with a public appeal:

Ladies and gentlemen, I must be frank to state that in seeking in my own mind any justification for this conference the most impelling reason that occurred to me is the importance of recognizing that in the death of Marilyn Monroe she has unwittingly and unfortunately played the greatest role of her career in focusing the attention of every one of us living on the gravity of a worldwide problem that bathetically cries out for a solution.3

Sitting beside Curphey were two men, psychologist Norman Farberow and psychiatrist Robert Litman, who had helped the coroner reach the verdict of a "probable suicide" by performing a "psychological autopsy" on Monroe, studying her lifestyle, behavior, and character traits to uncover her suicidal state of mind.4 Solemn in their black suits, Farberow and [End Page 33] Litman fielded questions from the press about Monroe's final moments. "The only conclusion we could reach was suicide," Litman stated. "Or at least a gamble with death."5

Farberow and Litman had developed this method of psychological enquiry while working with Edwin Shneidman at the Los Angeles Suicide Prevention Center, an organization established just four years earlier as a clinical practice, public health agency, and research site into suicide. The Center's origins, though, date to 1949, the year Death of a Salesman opened in Broadway's Morosco Theatre. While Miller refined Salesman's production script, Shneidman, who would later be considered "a father of contemporary suicidology," analyzed 721 suicide notes pulled from a coroner's vault and compared them in a blind test to simulated notes written by non-suicidal individuals.6 This systematic study became a seminal development in the emerging discipline of "suicidology," "the scientific study of suicidal phenomena."7 And it is this investigation into Monroe's death, an infamous event in twentieth-century history, and a seminal moment in the contemporary study of suicide, that represents the nexus between Miller and Shneidman, the playwright and the psychologist, two men preoccupied with understanding suicidal experience.

Although working in different fields, Miller's and Shneidman's approaches to suicide reflected a similar interest in the circumstances and motivations driving an individual to death. Born in 1915 and 1918 respectively, Miller and Shneidman came of age during the Great Depression, an event that saw the American suicide rate increase by over twenty percent.8 As college students, both men expressed an interest in the connection between literature and psychology: Miller, an English major, took a sophomore psychology course with Walter Bowers Pillsbury at the University of Michigan; Shneidman, a Psychology major, took a sophomore American literature course with George Shelton Hubbell at the University of California Los Angeles.9 Over their careers, they gravitated towards literature that probed the human psyche. Miller cited the experience of reading Dostoevsky—whose four great novels Crime and Punishment (1866), The Idiot (1869), Demons (1872), and The Brothers Karamazov (1880) delve into suicidal psychology, what the Russian writer called "the dreadful question of our age"—while a high [End Page 34] school senior as the moment when "I knew that I had to be a writer."10 Shneidman, too, believed "the world's greatest psychologists are not Wundt or Titchener or...

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿瑟-米勒的舞台自杀学:推销员之死》中的自杀与戏剧形式
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 阿瑟-米勒的舞台自杀学:《推销员之死》中的自杀与戏剧形式 Nicholas Duddy (bio) 1962 年 8 月 5 日,阿瑟-米勒的前妻玛丽莲-梦露的尸体在布伦特伍德家中的卧室被发现。纠结的床单、药瓶、手边的旋转电话听筒--房间就像一个谋杀之谜的场景,这位文化偶像死后受到的关注与生前一样多1。世界各地的报纸都在头版头条以含糊其辞又耸人听闻的标题宣布了她的死讯:"玛丽莲死了"(《每日新闻》)、"玛丽莲电话之谜"(《每日快报》)、"玛丽莲-梦露自杀:被发现裸体躺在床上......手放在电话上......服用了 40 粒药丸"(《纽约镜报》)2。2 不到两周后,洛杉矶县验尸官西奥多-柯菲(Theodore Curphey)身着白大褂,叼着雪茄,坐在一屋子记者面前宣布了他的调查结果。在宣布裁决之前,他向公众发出了呼吁: 女士们,先生们,我必须坦率地说,在我自己的脑海中寻找召开这次会议的任何理由时,我想到的最重要的理由是,必须认识到玛丽莲-梦露之死在她的职业生涯中不知不觉地、不幸地发挥了最大的作用,使我们每一个人都关注到了一个世界性问题的严重性,这个问题亟待解决3。 坐在库尔菲身边的是心理学家诺曼-法贝罗(Norman Farberow)和精神病学家罗伯特-利特曼(Robert Litman),他们通过对梦露进行 "心理解剖",研究她的生活方式、行为和性格特征,帮助验尸官得出了 "很可能是自杀 "的结论,从而揭示了她的自杀心理状态。"利特曼说:"我们能得出的唯一结论就是自杀。"5法贝罗和利特曼在洛杉矶自杀预防中心与埃德温-施奈德曼(Edwin Shneidman)合作时,就已经开发出了这种心理调查方法,该中心成立于四年前,是一家集临床实践、公共卫生机构和自杀研究为一体的机构。该中心的起源可以追溯到 1949 年,也就是《推销员之死》在百老汇莫罗斯科剧院开演的那一年。在米勒完善《推销员之死》剧本的同时,后来被誉为 "当代自杀学之父 "的施奈德曼分析了从验尸官保险库中提取的 721 份自杀笔记,并在盲测中将其与非自杀者所写的模拟笔记进行比较。这项系统性研究成为新兴学科 "自杀学"("对自杀现象的科学研究")的开创性进展。7 而正是对门罗之死这一 20 世纪历史上臭名昭著的事件以及当代自杀研究的开创性时刻的调查,代表了剧作家米勒和心理学家施奈德曼这两个专注于理解自杀体验的人之间的联系。尽管米勒和施奈德曼从事不同领域的工作,但他们对自杀的研究方法反映了他们对驱使个体走向死亡的环境和动机的相似兴趣。米勒和施奈德曼分别出生于 1915 年和 1918 年,他们都是在美国经济大萧条时期长大的,当时美国的自杀率增长了 20% 以上:主修英语的米勒在密歇根大学选修了沃尔特-鲍尔斯-皮尔斯伯里(Walter Bowers Pillsbury)的大二心理学课程;主修心理学的施奈德曼在加州大学洛杉矶分校选修了乔治-谢尔顿-哈贝尔(George Shelton Hubbell)的大二美国文学课程。米勒说,在读陀思妥耶夫斯基的四部伟大小说《罪与罚》(1866 年)、《白痴》(1869 年)、《恶魔》(1872 年)和《卡拉马佐夫兄弟》(1880 年)时,"我知道我必须成为一名作家"。"10施奈德曼也认为,"世界上最伟大的心理学家不是翁德、蒂切纳或......
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
COMPARATIVE DRAMA
COMPARATIVE DRAMA Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Comparative Drama (ISSN 0010-4078) is a scholarly journal devoted to studies international in spirit and interdisciplinary in scope; it is published quarterly (Spring, Summer, Fall, and Winter) at Western Michigan University
期刊最新文献
In Memoriam: Clifford O. Davidson: 1932–2024 "Simply Sitting in a Chair": Questioning Representational Practice and Dramatic Convention in Marguerite Duras's L'Amante anglaise and The Viaducts of Seine-et-Oise Rewriting Idolatry: Doctor Faustus and Romeo and Juliet Measuring Protagonism in Early Modern European Theatre: A Distant Reading of the Character of Sophonisba Theater, War, and Revolution in Eighteenth-Century France and Its Empire by Logan J. Connors (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1