Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the upright head roll test for lateral semicircular canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo

Jae Sang Han, Dong-Hee Lee, Shi Nae Park, Kyoung Ho Park, Tae Ho Kim, Jae Hong Han, Min Ju Kang, So-Hyun Kim, Jae-Hyun Seo
{"title":"Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the upright head roll test for lateral semicircular canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo","authors":"Jae Sang Han, Dong-Hee Lee, Shi Nae Park, Kyoung Ho Park, Tae Ho Kim, Jae Hong Han, Min Ju Kang, So-Hyun Kim, Jae-Hyun Seo","doi":"10.3233/ves-230127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: The upright head roll test (UHRT) is a recently introduced diagnostic maneuver for lateral semicircular canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (LSC-BPPV). OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the UHRT. METHODS: Two separate studies were conducted.Study 1 analyzed 827 results of videonystagmography (VNG) to assess UHRT reliability, and Study 2 analyzed 130 LSC-BPPV cases to evaluate UHRT validity. RESULTS: The inter-test reliability between UHRT and the supine head roll test (SHRT) showed substantial agreement (Cohen’s kappa = 0.753) in direction-changing positional nystagmus (DCPN) and almost perfect agreement (Cohen’s kappa = 0.836) in distinguishing the direction of DCPN. The validity assessment of UHRT showed high accuracy in diagnosing LSC-BPPV (80.0% ) and in differentiating the variant types (74.6% ). UHRT was highly accurate in diagnosing the canalolithiasis type in LSC-BPPV patients (Cohen’s kappa = 0.835); however, it showed only moderate accuracy in diagnosing the cupulolithiasis type (Cohen’s kappa = 0.415). The intensity of nystagmus in UHRT was relatively weaker than that in SHRT (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: UHRT is a reliable test for diagnosing LSC-BPPV and distinguishing subtypes. However, UHRT has a limitation in discriminating the affected side owing to a weaker intensity of nystagmus than SHRT.","PeriodicalId":516316,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vestibular Research","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vestibular Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/ves-230127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The upright head roll test (UHRT) is a recently introduced diagnostic maneuver for lateral semicircular canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (LSC-BPPV). OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the UHRT. METHODS: Two separate studies were conducted.Study 1 analyzed 827 results of videonystagmography (VNG) to assess UHRT reliability, and Study 2 analyzed 130 LSC-BPPV cases to evaluate UHRT validity. RESULTS: The inter-test reliability between UHRT and the supine head roll test (SHRT) showed substantial agreement (Cohen’s kappa = 0.753) in direction-changing positional nystagmus (DCPN) and almost perfect agreement (Cohen’s kappa = 0.836) in distinguishing the direction of DCPN. The validity assessment of UHRT showed high accuracy in diagnosing LSC-BPPV (80.0% ) and in differentiating the variant types (74.6% ). UHRT was highly accurate in diagnosing the canalolithiasis type in LSC-BPPV patients (Cohen’s kappa = 0.835); however, it showed only moderate accuracy in diagnosing the cupulolithiasis type (Cohen’s kappa = 0.415). The intensity of nystagmus in UHRT was relatively weaker than that in SHRT (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: UHRT is a reliable test for diagnosing LSC-BPPV and distinguishing subtypes. However, UHRT has a limitation in discriminating the affected side owing to a weaker intensity of nystagmus than SHRT.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估侧半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕的直立头部滚动测试的可靠性和有效性
背景:直立滚头试验(UHRT)是最近推出的一种诊断外侧半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕(LSC-BPPV)的方法。目的:本研究旨在评估 UHRT 的可靠性和有效性。研究 1 分析了 827 例视频震颤成像(VNG)结果,以评估 UHRT 的可靠性;研究 2 分析了 130 例 LSC-BPPV 病例,以评估 UHRT 的有效性。结果:UHRT 和仰卧头部滚动测试(SHRT)在改变方向的位置性眼球震颤(DCPN)方面的测试间可靠性显示出很大的一致性(Cohen's kappa = 0.753),在区分 DCPN 的方向方面几乎完全一致(Cohen's kappa = 0.836)。UHRT 的有效性评估显示,其诊断 LSC-BPPV 的准确率很高(80.0%),区分变异类型的准确率也很高(74.6%)。UHRT 在诊断 LSC-BPPV 患者的管结石类型时准确率很高(Cohen's kappa = 0.835);但在诊断杯状结石类型时仅显示出中等准确率(Cohen's kappa = 0.415)。与 SHRT 相比,UHRT 的眼震强度相对较弱(P < 0.05)。结论:UHRT 是诊断 LSC-BPPV 和区分亚型的可靠测试。然而,由于 UHRT 的眼震强度弱于 SHRT,因此在区分患侧方面存在局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Visual scale to document acute dizziness in the hospital Recovery of turning speed in patients after vestibular schwannoma resection Psychometrics of inertial heading perception Sense of direction in vestibular disorders Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the upright head roll test for lateral semicircular canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1