Technology paternalism: Development and validation of a measurement scale

Martin Rochi, Philipp A. Rauschnabel, Karl-Heinz Renner, Björn S. Ivens
{"title":"Technology paternalism: Development and validation of a measurement scale","authors":"Martin Rochi, Philipp A. Rauschnabel, Karl-Heinz Renner, Björn S. Ivens","doi":"10.1002/mar.21971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As technologies become smarter, they tend to protect their users, much like parents protect their children. However, caring too much about a user can lead to technology paternalism, a construct that is becoming increasingly relevant with the advent of smart technologies. Nonetheless, very little is known about what technology paternalism is or how it can be measured. The authors applied established procedures from scale development methodology followed by quantitative measurement to present and validate a three-factor scale (limiting, overruling, and welfare). The approach offers first empirical evidence linking technology paternalism to associated concepts, showing that it correlates as expected with established constructs in the literature on technology acceptance. This study contributes to the literature by uncovering a construct of interest to a critical discussion of technology paternalism and by providing a measurement tool that can be used by researchers, policy makers, and managers.","PeriodicalId":501349,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Marketing","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As technologies become smarter, they tend to protect their users, much like parents protect their children. However, caring too much about a user can lead to technology paternalism, a construct that is becoming increasingly relevant with the advent of smart technologies. Nonetheless, very little is known about what technology paternalism is or how it can be measured. The authors applied established procedures from scale development methodology followed by quantitative measurement to present and validate a three-factor scale (limiting, overruling, and welfare). The approach offers first empirical evidence linking technology paternalism to associated concepts, showing that it correlates as expected with established constructs in the literature on technology acceptance. This study contributes to the literature by uncovering a construct of interest to a critical discussion of technology paternalism and by providing a measurement tool that can be used by researchers, policy makers, and managers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
技术家长制:测量量表的开发与验证
随着技术变得越来越智能,它们倾向于保护用户,就像父母保护孩子一样。然而,过于关心用户会导致技术家长制,而随着智能技术的出现,技术家长制正变得越来越重要。然而,人们对什么是技术家长制或如何衡量技术家长制知之甚少。作者运用量表开发方法的既定程序,然后进行定量测量,提出并验证了一个三因素量表(限制、凌驾和福利)。这种方法首次提供了将技术家长制与相关概念联系起来的实证证据,表明技术家长制与有关技术接受度的文献中的既定概念之间存在预期的相关性。这项研究揭示了技术家长制批判性讨论中的一个重要概念,并提供了一个可供研究人员、政策制定者和管理者使用的测量工具,从而为相关文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Vibrotactile feedback in m-commerce: Stimulating perceived control and perceived ownership to increase anticipated satisfaction First come, first served versus the draw: Perceived fairness in the new product purchase competition The social side of color: How social exclusion influences preferences for color combination Promoting organ donation through philanthropic partnerships Social media marketing activities, customer engagement, and customer stickiness: A longitudinal investigation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1