{"title":"Integration of rapid bioburden testing into production quality management systems and process control","authors":"Irina Ramos, Michelle Najera, Gene Schaefer","doi":"10.1002/btpr.3431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The move to integrated continuous bioprocessing (ICB), while providing a means for process intensification, can put added strain on process analytics when conventional methods are used. For instance, traditional microbial methods provide minimal value to ICB processes given that the time required for data to become available is much longer than a typical full cycle of the manufacturing process. Although rapid microbial detection has been in discussion for over 30 years, it is still not routinely deployed in commercial biopharmaceutical manufacturing. One contributing factor is the ability to integrate this technology into a process control strategy and existing quality systems. An understanding of the capability of microbial detection technology available today can be leveraged to implement a control strategy for bioburden monitoring in real time for process intermediates. One key tenet of this proposed control strategy is the use of a “two-tiered approach” wherein a fast (but possibly less sensitive) test is used to monitor the process and trigger further action for a second, longer duration test which is used to confirm and quantify the presence of bioburden and identify the organism. This approach, presented here alongside several case studies for microbial monitoring, can have broader application for other process analytical technologies where fit for purpose methods could be employed to establish process control alongside real time continuous processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8856,"journal":{"name":"Biotechnology Progress","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/btpr.3431","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotechnology Progress","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/btpr.3431","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The move to integrated continuous bioprocessing (ICB), while providing a means for process intensification, can put added strain on process analytics when conventional methods are used. For instance, traditional microbial methods provide minimal value to ICB processes given that the time required for data to become available is much longer than a typical full cycle of the manufacturing process. Although rapid microbial detection has been in discussion for over 30 years, it is still not routinely deployed in commercial biopharmaceutical manufacturing. One contributing factor is the ability to integrate this technology into a process control strategy and existing quality systems. An understanding of the capability of microbial detection technology available today can be leveraged to implement a control strategy for bioburden monitoring in real time for process intermediates. One key tenet of this proposed control strategy is the use of a “two-tiered approach” wherein a fast (but possibly less sensitive) test is used to monitor the process and trigger further action for a second, longer duration test which is used to confirm and quantify the presence of bioburden and identify the organism. This approach, presented here alongside several case studies for microbial monitoring, can have broader application for other process analytical technologies where fit for purpose methods could be employed to establish process control alongside real time continuous processes.
期刊介绍:
Biotechnology Progress , an official, bimonthly publication of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers and its technological community, the Society for Biological Engineering, features peer-reviewed research articles, reviews, and descriptions of emerging techniques for the development and design of new processes, products, and devices for the biotechnology, biopharmaceutical and bioprocess industries.
Widespread interest includes application of biological and engineering principles in fields such as applied cellular physiology and metabolic engineering, biocatalysis and bioreactor design, bioseparations and downstream processing, cell culture and tissue engineering, biosensors and process control, bioinformatics and systems biology, biomaterials and artificial organs, stem cell biology and genetics, and plant biology and food science. Manuscripts concerning the design of related processes, products, or devices are also encouraged. Four types of manuscripts are printed in the Journal: Research Papers, Topical or Review Papers, Letters to the Editor, and R & D Notes.