Risk of severe COVID-19 in unvaccinated patients during the period from wild-type to Omicron variant: real-world evidence from Japan.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1265/ehpm.23-00274
Kimiko Tomioka, Kenji Uno, Masahiro Yamada
{"title":"Risk of severe COVID-19 in unvaccinated patients during the period from wild-type to Omicron variant: real-world evidence from Japan.","authors":"Kimiko Tomioka, Kenji Uno, Masahiro Yamada","doi":"10.1265/ehpm.23-00274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many studies have reported that the Omicron variant is less pathogenic than the Delta variant and the wild-type. Epidemiological evidence regarding the risk of severe COVID-19 from the wild-type to the Omicron variant has been lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study participants were COVID-19 patients aged 18 and older without previous COVID-19 infection who were notified to the Nara Prefecture Chuwa Public Health Center from January 2020 to March 2023, during the periods from the wild-type to the Omicron variant. The outcome variable was severe COVID-19 (i.e., ICU admission or COVID-19-related death). The explanatory variable was SARS-CoV-2 variant type or the number of COVID-19 vaccinations. Covariates included gender, age, risk factors for aggravation, and the number of general hospital beds per population. The generalized estimating equations of negative binomial regression models were used to estimate the adjusted incidence proportion (AIP) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for severe COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 77,044 patients included in the analysis, 14,556 (18.9%) were unvaccinated and 520 (0.7%) developed severe COVID-19. Among unvaccinated patients, the risk of severe COVID-19 increased in the Alpha/Delta variants and decreased in the Omicron variant compared to the wild-type (AIP [95% CI] was 1.55 [1.06-2.27] in Alpha/Delta and 0.25 [0.15-0.40] in Omicron), but differed by age. Especially in patients aged ≥80, there was no significant difference in the risk of severe COVID-19 between the wild-type and the Omicron variant (AIP [95% CI] = 0.59 [0.27-1.29]). Regarding the preventive effect of vaccines, among all study participants, the number of vaccinations was significantly associated with the prevention of severe COVID-19, regardless of variant type. After stratified analyses by age, patients aged ≥80 remained a significant association for all variant types. On the other hand, the number of vaccinations had no association in Omicron BA.5 of patients aged 18-64.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients aged ≥80 had less reduction in risk of severe COVID-19 during the Omicron variant period, and a greater preventive effect of vaccines against severe COVID-19, compared to younger people. Our findings suggest that booster vaccination is effective and necessary for older people, especially aged ≥80.</p>","PeriodicalId":11707,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine","volume":"29 ","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10937246/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1265/ehpm.23-00274","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many studies have reported that the Omicron variant is less pathogenic than the Delta variant and the wild-type. Epidemiological evidence regarding the risk of severe COVID-19 from the wild-type to the Omicron variant has been lacking.

Methods: Study participants were COVID-19 patients aged 18 and older without previous COVID-19 infection who were notified to the Nara Prefecture Chuwa Public Health Center from January 2020 to March 2023, during the periods from the wild-type to the Omicron variant. The outcome variable was severe COVID-19 (i.e., ICU admission or COVID-19-related death). The explanatory variable was SARS-CoV-2 variant type or the number of COVID-19 vaccinations. Covariates included gender, age, risk factors for aggravation, and the number of general hospital beds per population. The generalized estimating equations of negative binomial regression models were used to estimate the adjusted incidence proportion (AIP) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for severe COVID-19.

Results: Among 77,044 patients included in the analysis, 14,556 (18.9%) were unvaccinated and 520 (0.7%) developed severe COVID-19. Among unvaccinated patients, the risk of severe COVID-19 increased in the Alpha/Delta variants and decreased in the Omicron variant compared to the wild-type (AIP [95% CI] was 1.55 [1.06-2.27] in Alpha/Delta and 0.25 [0.15-0.40] in Omicron), but differed by age. Especially in patients aged ≥80, there was no significant difference in the risk of severe COVID-19 between the wild-type and the Omicron variant (AIP [95% CI] = 0.59 [0.27-1.29]). Regarding the preventive effect of vaccines, among all study participants, the number of vaccinations was significantly associated with the prevention of severe COVID-19, regardless of variant type. After stratified analyses by age, patients aged ≥80 remained a significant association for all variant types. On the other hand, the number of vaccinations had no association in Omicron BA.5 of patients aged 18-64.

Conclusions: Patients aged ≥80 had less reduction in risk of severe COVID-19 during the Omicron variant period, and a greater preventive effect of vaccines against severe COVID-19, compared to younger people. Our findings suggest that booster vaccination is effective and necessary for older people, especially aged ≥80.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从野生型到 Omicron 变异型期间未接种疫苗的患者发生严重 COVID-19 的风险:来自日本的实际证据。
背景:许多研究报告称,Omicron变体的致病性低于Delta变体和野生型。有关从野生型到 Omicron 变体的严重 COVID-19 风险的流行病学证据尚缺:研究对象为 2020 年 1 月至 2023 年 3 月期间向奈良县中和公共卫生中心通报的、年龄在 18 岁及以上、既往未感染过 COVID-19 的患者。结果变量为严重 COVID-19(即入住重症监护室或与 COVID-19 相关的死亡)。解释变量为 SARS-CoV-2 变异类型或 COVID-19 疫苗接种次数。协变量包括性别、年龄、病情恶化的风险因素和人均综合医院床位数。采用负二项回归模型的广义估计方程来估计重症COVID-19的调整发病率比例(AIP)和95%置信区间(CI):在纳入分析的 77,044 名患者中,14,556 人(18.9%)未接种疫苗,520 人(0.7%)罹患重症 COVID-19。在未接种疫苗的患者中,与野生型相比,Alpha/Delta 变体发生重症 COVID-19 的风险增加,Omicron 变体发生重症 COVID-19 的风险降低(Alpha/Delta 的 AIP [95% CI] 为 1.55 [1.06-2.27],Omicron 为 0.25 [0.15-0.40]),但因年龄而异。特别是在年龄≥80 岁的患者中,野生型和 Omicron 变异型患者发生严重 COVID-19 的风险没有显著差异(AIP [95% CI] = 0.59 [0.27-1.29])。关于疫苗的预防效果,在所有研究参与者中,接种疫苗的次数与预防严重COVID-19显著相关,而与变异类型无关。按年龄进行分层分析后,年龄≥80岁的患者与所有变异类型仍有显著相关性。另一方面,在 18-64 岁的患者中,接种疫苗的次数与 Omicron BA.5 没有关系:结论:与年轻人相比,年龄≥80 岁的患者在 Omicron 变异期间患重症 COVID-19 的风险降低较少,而疫苗对重症 COVID-19 的预防效果更大。我们的研究结果表明,加强接种疫苗对老年人,尤其是≥80岁的老年人是有效且必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.10%
发文量
44
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Japanese Society for Hygiene, Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine (EHPM) brings a comprehensive approach to prevention and environmental health related to medical, biological, molecular biological, genetic, physical, psychosocial, chemical, and other environmental factors. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine features definitive studies on human health sciences and provides comprehensive and unique information to a worldwide readership.
期刊最新文献
Association between urinary metallothionein concentration and causes of death among cadmium-exposed residents in Japan: a 35-year follow-up study. Application of machine learning algorithms in predicting new onset hypertension: a study based on the China Health and Nutrition Survey. Characteristics and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest among students under school supervision in Japan: a descriptive epidemiological study (2008-2021). Impact of fear of coronavirus disease 2019 on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder traits associated with depressive symptoms, functional impairment, and low self-esteem in university students: a cross-sectional study with mediation analysis. Regional adipose distribution and metabolically unhealthy phenotype in Chinese adults: evidence from China National Health Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1