Behavioral Interventions Can Improve Brain Injury-Induced Deficits in Behavioral Flexibility and Impulsivity Linked to Impaired Reward-Feedback Beta Oscillations.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurotrauma Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-03 DOI:10.1089/neu.2023.0448
Miranda F Koloski, Christopher M O'Hearn, Michelle Frankot, Lauren P Giesler, Dhakshin S Ramanathan, Cole Vonder Haar
{"title":"Behavioral Interventions Can Improve Brain Injury-Induced Deficits in Behavioral Flexibility and Impulsivity Linked to Impaired Reward-Feedback Beta Oscillations.","authors":"Miranda F Koloski, Christopher M O'Hearn, Michelle Frankot, Lauren P Giesler, Dhakshin S Ramanathan, Cole Vonder Haar","doi":"10.1089/neu.2023.0448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) affects a large population, resulting in severe cognitive impairments. Although cognitive rehabilitation is an accepted treatment for some deficits, studies in patients are limited in ability to probe physiological and behavioral mechanisms. Therefore, animal models are needed to optimize strategies. Frontal TBI in a rat model results in robust and replicable cognitive deficits, making this an ideal candidate for investigating various behavioral interventions. In this study, we report three distinct frontal TBI experiments assessing behavior well into the chronic post-injury period using male Long-Evans rats. First, we evaluated the impact of frontal injury on local field potentials recorded simultaneously from 12 brain regions during a probabilistic reversal learning (PbR) task. Next, a set of rats were tested on a similar PbR task or an impulsivity task (differential reinforcement of low-rate behavior [DRL]) and half received salient cues associated with reinforcement contingencies to encourage engagement in the target behavior. After intervention on the PbR task, brains were stained for markers of activity. On the DRL task, cue relevance was decoupled from outcomes to determine if beneficial effects persisted on impulsive behavior. TBI decreased the ability to detect reinforced outcomes; this was evident in task performance and reward-feedback signals occurring at beta frequencies in lateral orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and associated frontostriatal regions. The behavioral intervention improved flexibility and increased OFC activity. Intervention also reduced impulsivity, even after cues were decoupled, which was partially mediated by improvements in timing behavior. The current study established a platform to begin investigating cognitive rehabilitation in rats and identified a strong role for dysfunctional OFC signaling in probabilistic learning after frontal TBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":16512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurotrauma","volume":" ","pages":"e1721-e1737"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11339556/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurotrauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2023.0448","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) affects a large population, resulting in severe cognitive impairments. Although cognitive rehabilitation is an accepted treatment for some deficits, studies in patients are limited in ability to probe physiological and behavioral mechanisms. Therefore, animal models are needed to optimize strategies. Frontal TBI in a rat model results in robust and replicable cognitive deficits, making this an ideal candidate for investigating various behavioral interventions. In this study, we report three distinct frontal TBI experiments assessing behavior well into the chronic post-injury period using male Long-Evans rats. First, we evaluated the impact of frontal injury on local field potentials recorded simultaneously from 12 brain regions during a probabilistic reversal learning (PbR) task. Next, a set of rats were tested on a similar PbR task or an impulsivity task (differential reinforcement of low-rate behavior [DRL]) and half received salient cues associated with reinforcement contingencies to encourage engagement in the target behavior. After intervention on the PbR task, brains were stained for markers of activity. On the DRL task, cue relevance was decoupled from outcomes to determine if beneficial effects persisted on impulsive behavior. TBI decreased the ability to detect reinforced outcomes; this was evident in task performance and reward-feedback signals occurring at beta frequencies in lateral orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and associated frontostriatal regions. The behavioral intervention improved flexibility and increased OFC activity. Intervention also reduced impulsivity, even after cues were decoupled, which was partially mediated by improvements in timing behavior. The current study established a platform to begin investigating cognitive rehabilitation in rats and identified a strong role for dysfunctional OFC signaling in probabilistic learning after frontal TBI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行为干预可以改善脑损伤引起的行为灵活性和冲动性缺陷,这些缺陷与受损的回报-反馈β振荡有关。
创伤性脑损伤(TBI)影响着大量人群,导致严重的认知障碍。虽然认知康复是治疗某些缺陷的公认疗法,但对患者进行的研究在探究生理和行为机制方面能力有限。因此,需要通过动物模型来优化治疗策略。在大鼠模型中进行额叶创伤性脑损伤会导致强大且可复制的认知障碍,因此是研究各种行为干预措施的理想候选模型。在本研究中,我们报告了三项不同的额叶创伤性脑损伤实验,使用雄性长-埃文斯大鼠评估受伤后慢性期的行为。首先,我们评估了额叶损伤对在概率反转学习任务(PbR)中同时从 12 个脑区记录的局部场电位的影响。接着,一组大鼠接受了类似的 PbR 任务或冲动性任务(低速率行为的差异强化:DRL)测试,其中一半接受了与强化或然条件相关的突出线索,以鼓励参与目标行为。在对 PbR 任务进行干预后,大脑会被染色以检测活动标记。在DRL任务中,提示相关性与结果脱钩,以确定对冲动行为的有益影响是否持续。创伤性脑损伤降低了检测强化结果的能力;这一点在任务表现和外侧眶额皮层(OFC)及相关前额纹状体区域β频率的奖励反馈信号中表现得很明显。行为干预提高了灵活性,增加了 OFC 的活动。干预还降低了冲动性,即使在线索脱钩后也是如此,这部分是由计时行为的改善促成的。目前的研究为开始研究大鼠的认知康复建立了一个平台,并确定了额叶创伤性脑损伤后OFC信号传导功能障碍在概率学习中的重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurotrauma
Journal of neurotrauma 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
233
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Neurotrauma is the flagship, peer-reviewed publication for reporting on the latest advances in both the clinical and laboratory investigation of traumatic brain and spinal cord injury. The Journal focuses on the basic pathobiology of injury to the central nervous system, while considering preclinical and clinical trials targeted at improving both the early management and long-term care and recovery of traumatically injured patients. This is the essential journal publishing cutting-edge basic and translational research in traumatically injured human and animal studies, with emphasis on neurodegenerative disease research linked to CNS trauma.
期刊最新文献
Intravenous Immunomodulatory Nanoparticles Prevent Secondary Damage after Traumatic Brain Injury. Altered Dynamic Brain Functional Network Connectivity Related to Visual Network in Spinal Cord Injury. Genetic Differences Modify Anesthetic Preconditioning of Traumatic Brain Injury in Drosophila. Measuring Self-Efficacy for Concussion Recovery: Psychometric Characteristics of the Progressive Activities of Controlled Exertion-Self-Efficacy Scale. Correction to: Impact of Low-Level Blast Exposure on Brain Function after a One-Day Tactile Training and the Ameliorating Effect of a Jugular Vein Compression Neck Collar Device; DOI: 10.1089/neu.2018.5737.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1