Effect of Dental Practicality Index training using an online video on decision-making and confidence level in treatment planning by dental undergraduates.

Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics Pub Date : 2024-01-24 eCollection Date: 2024-02-01 DOI:10.5395/rde.2024.49.e8
Zhai Wei See, Ming Sern Lee, Abhishek Parolia, Shalini Kanagasingam, Shilpa Gunjal, Shanon Patel
{"title":"Effect of Dental Practicality Index training using an online video on decision-making and confidence level in treatment planning by dental undergraduates.","authors":"Zhai Wei See, Ming Sern Lee, Abhishek Parolia, Shalini Kanagasingam, Shilpa Gunjal, Shanon Patel","doi":"10.5395/rde.2024.49.e8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of Dental Practicality Index (DPI) training using an online video on the treatment planning decisions and confidence level of dental undergraduates (DUs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ninety-four DUs were shown 15 clinical case scenarios and asked to decide on treatment plans based on 4 treatment options. The most appropriate treatment plan had been decided by a consensus panel of experienced dentists. DUs then underwent DPI training using an online video. In a post-DPI-training test, DUs were shown the same clinical case scenarios and asked to assign the best treatment option. After 6 weeks, DUs were retested to assess their knowledge retention. In all 3 tests, DUs completed the confidence level scale questionnaire. Data were analyzed using the related-samples Wilcoxon signed rank test and the independent-samples Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test with the level of significance set at <i>p</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DPI training significantly improved the mean scores of the DUs from 7.53 in the pre-DPI-training test to 9.01 in the post-DPI-training test (<i>p</i> < 0.001). After 6 weeks, the mean scores decreased marginally to 8.87 in the retention test (<i>p</i> = 0.563). DPI training increased their confidence level from 5.68 pre-DPI training to 7.09 post-DPI training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Training DUs using DPI with an online video improved their decision-making and confidence level in treatment planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":21102,"journal":{"name":"Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics","volume":"49 1","pages":"e8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10912547/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2024.49.e8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of Dental Practicality Index (DPI) training using an online video on the treatment planning decisions and confidence level of dental undergraduates (DUs).

Materials and methods: Ninety-four DUs were shown 15 clinical case scenarios and asked to decide on treatment plans based on 4 treatment options. The most appropriate treatment plan had been decided by a consensus panel of experienced dentists. DUs then underwent DPI training using an online video. In a post-DPI-training test, DUs were shown the same clinical case scenarios and asked to assign the best treatment option. After 6 weeks, DUs were retested to assess their knowledge retention. In all 3 tests, DUs completed the confidence level scale questionnaire. Data were analyzed using the related-samples Wilcoxon signed rank test and the independent-samples Mann-Whitney U test with the level of significance set at p < 0.05.

Results: DPI training significantly improved the mean scores of the DUs from 7.53 in the pre-DPI-training test to 9.01 in the post-DPI-training test (p < 0.001). After 6 weeks, the mean scores decreased marginally to 8.87 in the retention test (p = 0.563). DPI training increased their confidence level from 5.68 pre-DPI training to 7.09 post-DPI training.

Conclusions: Training DUs using DPI with an online video improved their decision-making and confidence level in treatment planning.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用在线视频进行口腔实用性指数培训对口腔医学本科生制定治疗计划的决策和信心水平的影响。
研究目的本研究的目的是评估使用在线视频进行的牙科实用性指数(DPI)培训对牙科本科生(DUs)的治疗计划决策和信心水平的影响:向 94 名牙科大学生展示了 15 个临床病例,要求他们根据 4 种治疗方案决定治疗计划。最合适的治疗方案由经验丰富的牙科医生组成的共识小组决定。然后,使用在线视频对 DU 进行 DPI 培训。在 DPI 培训后的测试中,DUs 观看了相同的临床病例,并被要求指定最佳治疗方案。6 周后,对 DUs 进行复测,以评估他们的知识保留情况。在所有 3 次测试中,被试都填写了信心水平量表问卷。数据分析采用相关样本 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验和独立样本 Mann-Whitney U 检验,显著性水平为 p <0.05:DPI训练明显提高了DUs的平均得分,从DPI训练前测试的7.53分提高到DPI训练后测试的9.01分(p < 0.001)。6 周后,平均得分略有下降,在保留测试中为 8.87(p = 0.563)。DPI 培训提高了他们的自信水平,从 DPI 培训前的 5.68 提高到 DPI 培训后的 7.09:通过在线视频培训 DUs 使用 DPI,提高了他们在治疗计划中的决策能力和信心水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
A 48-month clinical performance of hybrid ceramic fragment restorations manufactured in CAD/CAM in non-carious cervical lesions: case report. Assessment of mechanical allodynia in healthy teeth adjacent and contralateral to endodontically diseased teeth: a clinical study. A global overview of enamel microabrasion for white spot lesions: a bibliometric review. Effect of surface sealant on the color stability and whiteness index of single-shade resin composites after staining and bleaching. Endodontic characteristics of mandibular premolar with dens evaginatus: a retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1