Lumbar and neck injuries of occupants in different reclining postures

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Chinese Journal of Traumatology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cjtee.2024.02.005
Di-Yi Liu , Sen Xiao , Fei-Fei Han , Bo-Tao Hu
{"title":"Lumbar and neck injuries of occupants in different reclining postures","authors":"Di-Yi Liu ,&nbsp;Sen Xiao ,&nbsp;Fei-Fei Han ,&nbsp;Bo-Tao Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.cjtee.2024.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>With the increasing level of automation in automobiles, the advent of autonomous vehicles has reduced the tendency of drivers and passengers to focus on the task of driving. The increasing automation in automobiles reduced the drivers' and passengers' focus on driving, which allowed occupants to choose a more relaxed and comfortable sitting position. Meanwhile, the occupant's sitting position went from a frontal, upright position to a more relaxed and reclined one, which resulted in the existing restraint systems cannot to keep occupants safe and secure. This study aimed to determine the effects of different reclining states on occupants' lumbar and neck injuries.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is an original research on the field of automotive safety engineering. Occupants in different initial sitting positions (25°, 35°, 45°, and 55°) were adapted to changes in seat back angle and restraint systems and placed in the same frontal impact environment. Neck injury indexes, lumbar axial compression force and acceleration, as well as occupant dynamic response during the impact, were compared in different sitting positions. The injury response and kinematic characteristics of occupants in different reclining positions were analyzed by the control variable method.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>As the sitting angle increased, the occupant's head acceleration decreased, and the forward-lean angle decreased. Occupants in the standard sitting position had the greatest neck injury, with an N<sub>ij</sub> of 0.95, and were susceptible to abbreviated injury scale 2+ cervical medullary injuries. As the seatback angle increased, the geometric position of the lumbar spine tended to be horizontal, and the impact load transmitted greater forces to the lumbar spine. The occupant's lumbar injury was greatest in the lying position, with a peak axial compression force on the lumbar region of 5.5 KN, which was 2.3 KN greater than in the standard sitting position.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study of occupant lumbar and neck injuries based on different recline states can provide a theoretical basis for optimizing lumbar evaluation indexes, which is conducive to the understanding of the lumbar injury mechanism and the comprehensive consideration of occupant safety protection.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51555,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Traumatology","volume":"27 4","pages":"Pages 211-217"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1008127524000117/pdfft?md5=b06d2ad1db8ebab03d53ed34866b916e&pid=1-s2.0-S1008127524000117-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1008127524000117","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

With the increasing level of automation in automobiles, the advent of autonomous vehicles has reduced the tendency of drivers and passengers to focus on the task of driving. The increasing automation in automobiles reduced the drivers' and passengers' focus on driving, which allowed occupants to choose a more relaxed and comfortable sitting position. Meanwhile, the occupant's sitting position went from a frontal, upright position to a more relaxed and reclined one, which resulted in the existing restraint systems cannot to keep occupants safe and secure. This study aimed to determine the effects of different reclining states on occupants' lumbar and neck injuries.

Methods

This is an original research on the field of automotive safety engineering. Occupants in different initial sitting positions (25°, 35°, 45°, and 55°) were adapted to changes in seat back angle and restraint systems and placed in the same frontal impact environment. Neck injury indexes, lumbar axial compression force and acceleration, as well as occupant dynamic response during the impact, were compared in different sitting positions. The injury response and kinematic characteristics of occupants in different reclining positions were analyzed by the control variable method.

Results

As the sitting angle increased, the occupant's head acceleration decreased, and the forward-lean angle decreased. Occupants in the standard sitting position had the greatest neck injury, with an Nij of 0.95, and were susceptible to abbreviated injury scale 2+ cervical medullary injuries. As the seatback angle increased, the geometric position of the lumbar spine tended to be horizontal, and the impact load transmitted greater forces to the lumbar spine. The occupant's lumbar injury was greatest in the lying position, with a peak axial compression force on the lumbar region of 5.5 KN, which was 2.3 KN greater than in the standard sitting position.

Conclusion

The study of occupant lumbar and neck injuries based on different recline states can provide a theoretical basis for optimizing lumbar evaluation indexes, which is conducive to the understanding of the lumbar injury mechanism and the comprehensive consideration of occupant safety protection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同躺卧姿势下的乘客腰部和颈部受伤情况。
目的:随着汽车自动化水平的不断提高,自动驾驶汽车的出现减少了驾驶员和乘客专注于驾驶任务的倾向。汽车自动化程度的不断提高减少了驾驶员和乘客对驾驶的关注,这使得乘员可以选择更加放松和舒适的坐姿。与此同时,乘员的坐姿也从正面直立变为更加放松和倾斜,这导致现有的约束系统无法保证乘员的安全。本研究旨在确定不同倾斜状态对乘员腰部和颈部伤害的影响:这是一项汽车安全工程领域的原创性研究。对不同初始坐姿(25°、35°、45°和55°)的乘员进行了调整,以适应座椅靠背角度和约束系统的变化,并将其置于相同的正面撞击环境中。比较了不同坐姿下的颈部损伤指数、腰部轴向压缩力和加速度,以及撞击过程中乘员的动态响应。采用控制变量法分析了不同躺卧姿势下乘员的损伤反应和运动学特征:结果:随着坐姿角度的增加,乘员的头部加速度减小,前倾角度减小。标准坐姿下的乘员颈部受伤最严重,Nij值为0.95,容易造成简易损伤量表2+颈髓损伤。随着座椅靠背角度的增加,腰椎的几何位置趋于水平,冲击载荷向腰椎传递更大的力。卧姿对乘员腰部的伤害最大,腰部受到的轴向压缩力峰值为 5.5 千牛顿,比标准坐姿高出 2.3 千牛顿:基于不同仰卧状态的乘员腰部和颈部损伤研究可为优化腰部评价指标提供理论依据,有利于了解腰部损伤机理和全面考虑乘员安全保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1707
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Traumatology (CJT, ISSN 1008-1275) was launched in 1998 and is a peer-reviewed English journal authorized by Chinese Association of Trauma, Chinese Medical Association. It is multidisciplinary and designed to provide the most current and relevant information for both the clinical and basic research in the field of traumatic medicine. CJT primarily publishes expert forums, original papers, case reports and so on. Topics cover trauma system and management, surgical procedures, acute care, rehabilitation, post-traumatic complications, translational medicine, traffic medicine and other related areas. The journal especially emphasizes clinical application, technique, surgical video, guideline, recommendations for more effective surgical approaches.
期刊最新文献
FM1-Editorial board 4-Octyl itaconate inhibits synovitis in the mouse model of post-traumatic osteoarthritis and alleviates pain. Recent advances in the management of chronic ankle instability. Relevance of intra-abdominal pressure monitoring in non-operative management of patients with blunt liver and splenic injuries. Molecular mechanism underlying the protective effects of ischemic preconditioning in total knee arthroplasty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1