Compatibility of Standard Vagus Nerve Stimulation and Investigational Microburst Vagus Nerve Stimulation Therapy with fMRI.

Erik H Middlebrooks, Jerzy P Szaflarski, Jason Begnaud, Ashesh Thaker, Kenny Henderson, Mark Bolding, Jill A Sellers, Jane Allendorfer
{"title":"Compatibility of Standard Vagus Nerve Stimulation and Investigational Microburst Vagus Nerve Stimulation Therapy with fMRI.","authors":"Erik H Middlebrooks, Jerzy P Szaflarski, Jason Begnaud, Ashesh Thaker, Kenny Henderson, Mark Bolding, Jill A Sellers, Jane Allendorfer","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vagus nerve stimulation devices are conditionally approved for MR imaging with stimulation turned off, and the requirement to modify the stimulation settings may be a barrier to scanning in some radiology practices. There is increasing interest in studying the effects of stimulation during MR imaging/fMRI. This study evaluated the safety of standard and investigational microburst vagus nerve stimulation therapies during MR imaging/fMRI. A prospective, multicenter study was conducted in patients with an investigational vagus nerve stimulation device that delivered either standard or investigational microburst vagus nerve stimulation. Thirty participants underwent sequential MR imaging and fMRI scans, encompassing 188 total hours of scan time (62.7 hours with standard vagus nerve stimulation and 125.3 hours with investigational microburst vagus nerve stimulation). No adverse events were reported with active stimulation during MR imaging or during 12 months of follow-up. Our results support the safety of standard and investigational microburst vagus nerve stimulation therapy during MR imaging and fMRI scans.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11383398/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vagus nerve stimulation devices are conditionally approved for MR imaging with stimulation turned off, and the requirement to modify the stimulation settings may be a barrier to scanning in some radiology practices. There is increasing interest in studying the effects of stimulation during MR imaging/fMRI. This study evaluated the safety of standard and investigational microburst vagus nerve stimulation therapies during MR imaging/fMRI. A prospective, multicenter study was conducted in patients with an investigational vagus nerve stimulation device that delivered either standard or investigational microburst vagus nerve stimulation. Thirty participants underwent sequential MR imaging and fMRI scans, encompassing 188 total hours of scan time (62.7 hours with standard vagus nerve stimulation and 125.3 hours with investigational microburst vagus nerve stimulation). No adverse events were reported with active stimulation during MR imaging or during 12 months of follow-up. Our results support the safety of standard and investigational microburst vagus nerve stimulation therapy during MR imaging and fMRI scans.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
标准迷走神经刺激疗法和研究性微脉冲迷走神经刺激疗法与功能磁共振成像的兼容性。
迷走神经刺激装置有条件地被批准在磁共振成像中关闭刺激,而修改刺激设置的要求可能会成为某些放射科进行扫描的障碍。人们对核磁共振/磁共振成像期间刺激效果的研究兴趣与日俱增。本研究评估了标准迷走神经刺激疗法和研究性微脉冲迷走神经刺激疗法在 MRI/fMRI 期间的安全性。这项前瞻性、多中心研究在使用研究性迷走神经刺激装置的患者中进行,该装置可提供标准或研究性微爆破迷走神经刺激。30 名参与者接受了连续的 MRI 和 fMRI 扫描,扫描时间共计 188 小时(标准迷走神经刺激 62.7 小时,研究性微脉冲迷走神经刺激 125.3 小时)。在核磁共振成像期间或 12 个月的随访期间,未报告主动刺激的不良事件。我们的研究结果表明,在核磁共振成像和 fMRI 扫描期间,标准迷走神经刺激疗法和研究性微脉冲迷走神经刺激疗法都是安全的:VNS = 迷走神经刺激;µVNS = 微脉冲迷走神经刺激;DRE = 耐药性癫痫;U.S. = 美国;FOS = 局灶性发作;PGTC = 原发性全身强直阵挛发作;IDE = 研究性设备豁免;SD = 标准偏差;EEG = 脑电图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association of Pretreatment Perfusion Imaging Parameters With 90-Day Excellent Functional Outcomes in Anterior Circulation Distal Medium Vessel Occlusion Stroke. Deep learning-based algorithm for automatic quantification of nigrosome-1 and Parkinsonism classification using susceptibility map-weighted MRI. High wall shear stress is related to complicated AHA lesion type VI plaques in mild to moderate internal carotid artery stenosis - a 3D cardiovascular MRI study. Prevalence of Spinal Meningeal Diverticula in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease. Comprehensive Review of Inner Ear Anatomy on Photon-Counting CT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1