Long-term survival and success rate of dental implants placed in reconstructed areas with extraoral autogenous bone grafts: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research Pub Date : 2024-03-07 DOI:10.1111/cid.13319
Vittorio Moraschini DDS, MSc, PhD, Rafael Seabra Louro DDS, MSc, PhD, Andrea Son DDS, MSc, Monica Diuana Calasans-Maia DDS, MSc, PhD, Suelen Cristina Sartoretto DDS, MSc, PhD, Jamil Awad Shibli DDS, MSc, PhD
{"title":"Long-term survival and success rate of dental implants placed in reconstructed areas with extraoral autogenous bone grafts: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Vittorio Moraschini DDS, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Rafael Seabra Louro DDS, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Andrea Son DDS, MSc,&nbsp;Monica Diuana Calasans-Maia DDS, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Suelen Cristina Sartoretto DDS, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Jamil Awad Shibli DDS, MSc, PhD","doi":"10.1111/cid.13319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the long-term survival and success rates of implants placed in reconstructed areas using microvascularized or non-microvascularized extraoral bone grafts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>An electronic search was performed in five databases and in gray literature for articles published until June, 2023. The eligibility criteria comprised observational studies (prospective or retrospective) and clinical trials, reporting survival and success rates of implants placed in extraoral bone grafts. A meta-analysis (implant failure) was categorized into subgroups based on the type of bone graft used. The risk of bias within studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up time was 92 months. The summary estimate of survival rate at the implant level were 94.9% (CI: 90.1%–97.4%) for non-vascularized iliac graft, 96.5% (CI: 91.4%–98.6%) for non-vascularized calvaria graft, and 92.3% (CI: 89.1%–94.6%) for vascularized fibula graft. The mean success rate and marginal bone loss (MBL) were 83.2%; 2.25 mm, 92.2%; 0.93 mm, and 87.6%; 1.49 mm, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Implants placed in areas reconstructed using extraoral autogenous bone graft have high long-term survival rates and low long-term MBLs. The data did not demonstrate clinically relevant differences in the survival, success, or MBL of grafts from different donor areas or with different vascularization.</p>\n \n <p>This systematic review was registered in INPLASY under number INPLASY202390004.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50679,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","volume":"26 3","pages":"469-481"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cid.13319","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the long-term survival and success rates of implants placed in reconstructed areas using microvascularized or non-microvascularized extraoral bone grafts.

Materials and Methods

An electronic search was performed in five databases and in gray literature for articles published until June, 2023. The eligibility criteria comprised observational studies (prospective or retrospective) and clinical trials, reporting survival and success rates of implants placed in extraoral bone grafts. A meta-analysis (implant failure) was categorized into subgroups based on the type of bone graft used. The risk of bias within studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

Results

Thirty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up time was 92 months. The summary estimate of survival rate at the implant level were 94.9% (CI: 90.1%–97.4%) for non-vascularized iliac graft, 96.5% (CI: 91.4%–98.6%) for non-vascularized calvaria graft, and 92.3% (CI: 89.1%–94.6%) for vascularized fibula graft. The mean success rate and marginal bone loss (MBL) were 83.2%; 2.25 mm, 92.2%; 0.93 mm, and 87.6%; 1.49 mm, respectively.

Conclusions

Implants placed in areas reconstructed using extraoral autogenous bone graft have high long-term survival rates and low long-term MBLs. The data did not demonstrate clinically relevant differences in the survival, success, or MBL of grafts from different donor areas or with different vascularization.

This systematic review was registered in INPLASY under number INPLASY202390004.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用口外自体骨移植在重建区域植入牙科种植体的长期存活率和成功率:系统回顾与荟萃分析。
目的评估使用微血管化或非微血管化口外骨移植物在重建区域植入种植体的长期存活率和成功率:在五个数据库和灰色文献中对 2023 年 6 月之前发表的文章进行了电子检索。合格标准包括观察性研究(前瞻性或回顾性)和临床试验,报告口外骨移植种植体的存活率和成功率。荟萃分析(植入失败)根据使用的骨移植类型分为不同的亚组。研究中的偏倚风险采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估:31项研究符合纳入标准。平均随访时间为 92 个月。无血管髂骨移植的植入水平存活率估计值为94.9%(CI:90.1%-97.4%),无血管腓骨移植的植入水平存活率估计值为96.5%(CI:91.4%-98.6%),有血管腓骨移植的植入水平存活率估计值为92.3%(CI:89.1%-94.6%)。平均成功率和边缘骨损失(MBL)分别为 83.2%; 2.25 mm、92.2%; 0.93 mm 和 87.6%; 1.49 mm:在使用口外自体骨移植重建的区域植入的种植体具有较高的长期存活率和较低的长期 MBL。数据并未显示来自不同供体区域或不同血管化的移植物在存活率、成功率或MBL方面存在临床相关性差异。本系统综述已在 INPLASY 注册,注册号为 INPLASY202390004。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
103
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research is to advance the scientific and technical aspects relating to dental implants and related scientific subjects. Dissemination of new and evolving information related to dental implants and the related science is the primary goal of our journal. The range of topics covered by the journals will include but be not limited to: New scientific developments relating to bone Implant surfaces and their relationship to the surrounding tissues Computer aided implant designs Computer aided prosthetic designs Immediate implant loading Immediate implant placement Materials relating to bone induction and conduction New surgical methods relating to implant placement New materials and methods relating to implant restorations Methods for determining implant stability A primary focus of the journal is publication of evidenced based articles evaluating to new dental implants, techniques and multicenter studies evaluating these treatments. In addition basic science research relating to wound healing and osseointegration will be an important focus for the journal.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Featured Cover A transcrestal sinus floor elevation strategy based on a haptic robot system: An in vitro study Influence of repeated implant‐abutment manipulation on the prevalence of peri‐implant diseases in complete arch restorations. A retrospective analysis Biocompatibility and dimensional stability through the use of 3D‐printed scaffolds made by polycaprolactone and bioglass‐7: An in vitro and in vivo study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1