Why is progress toward diverse representation so slow? Contrasting management practices’ prevalence versus effectiveness for achieving diverse representation

IF 5.8 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Business Horizons Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bushor.2024.02.012
Traci Sitzmann, Shoshana Schwartz
{"title":"Why is progress toward diverse representation so slow? Contrasting management practices’ prevalence versus effectiveness for achieving diverse representation","authors":"Traci Sitzmann, Shoshana Schwartz","doi":"10.1016/j.bushor.2024.02.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While a proliferation of management practices have been implemented in organizations in recent decades to create equitable and high performing workforces, there has been little to no progress toward diverse managerial representation during this timeframe. Our review contrasts the effectiveness of management practices for increasing diverse representation in management with how often these practices are utilized in organizations, centrally implicating ineffective management practices for the slow pace of change in diversifying managerial ranks. Specifically, we unveil that organizations predominantly implement ineffective and counterproductive practices that undermine managerial diversity while infrequently implementing practices that increase managerial diversity. For example, paid diversity roles (e.g., chief diversity officer), formal mentoring programs, and DEI-focused recruitment are among the most effective practices but are infrequently implemented in organizations. In contrast, diversity and harassment training and grievance procedures are frequently utilized in organizations but are negatively related to diverse representation. We also provide examples of organizations implementing multiple effective practices and making meaningful progress toward diversifying their workforces.","PeriodicalId":48347,"journal":{"name":"Business Horizons","volume":"102 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Horizons","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2024.02.012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While a proliferation of management practices have been implemented in organizations in recent decades to create equitable and high performing workforces, there has been little to no progress toward diverse managerial representation during this timeframe. Our review contrasts the effectiveness of management practices for increasing diverse representation in management with how often these practices are utilized in organizations, centrally implicating ineffective management practices for the slow pace of change in diversifying managerial ranks. Specifically, we unveil that organizations predominantly implement ineffective and counterproductive practices that undermine managerial diversity while infrequently implementing practices that increase managerial diversity. For example, paid diversity roles (e.g., chief diversity officer), formal mentoring programs, and DEI-focused recruitment are among the most effective practices but are infrequently implemented in organizations. In contrast, diversity and harassment training and grievance procedures are frequently utilized in organizations but are negatively related to diverse representation. We also provide examples of organizations implementing multiple effective practices and making meaningful progress toward diversifying their workforces.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么实现多元化代表性的进展如此缓慢?对比管理实践在实现多元化代表权方面的普遍性和有效性
近几十年来,各组织实施了大量管理实践,以建立公平和高绩效的员工队伍,但在这一时期,在实现管理人员多元化方面几乎没有取得任何进展。我们的研究对比了管理实践在提高管理层多元化代表性方面的有效性,以及这些实践在组织中的使用频率,并将无效的管理实践与管理队伍多元化变革步伐缓慢联系在一起。具体而言,我们揭示出,各组织主要实施的是破坏管理多样性的无效且适得其反的做法,而很少实施增加管理多样性的做法。例如,带薪的多元化职位(如首席多元化官)、正式的指导计划和以 DEI 为重点的招聘都是最有效的做法,但却很少在组织中实施。与此相反,多样性和骚扰培训以及申诉程序在各组织中经常使用,但却与多元化代表性呈负相关。我们还提供了一些组织实施多种有效做法并在实现员工队伍多元化方面取得有意义进展的实例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Business Horizons
Business Horizons BUSINESS-
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
5.40%
发文量
105
期刊介绍: Business Horizons, the bimonthly journal of the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University, is dedicated to publishing original articles that appeal to both business academics and practitioners. Our editorial focus is on covering a diverse array of topics within the broader field of business, with a particular emphasis on identifying critical business issues and proposing practical solutions. Our goal is to inspire readers to approach business practices from new and innovative perspectives. Business Horizons occupies a distinctive position among business publications by offering articles that strike a balance between academic rigor and practical relevance. As such, our articles are grounded in scholarly research yet presented in a clear and accessible format, making them relevant to a broad audience within the business community.
期刊最新文献
Inside front cover - ed board CIBER Acknowledgment Business and Peace, Part I: Insights from the first 20 years of B+P scholarship Inside front cover - ed board Peacebuilding by MNE subsidiaries: The role of intangible capital and local initiative
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1