Leftist governments, distributive strategies, and the politics of balance of payments-constrained growth in Chile and Uruguay

IF 3 2区 社会学 Q2 BUSINESS Competition & Change Pub Date : 2024-03-05 DOI:10.1177/10245294241237366
Juan Bogliaccini, Aldo Madariaga
{"title":"Leftist governments, distributive strategies, and the politics of balance of payments-constrained growth in Chile and Uruguay","authors":"Juan Bogliaccini, Aldo Madariaga","doi":"10.1177/10245294241237366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Leftist governments in peripheral economies have usually faced problems fulfilling their distributive mandate. Because of their inability to earn foreign exchange to pay for imports or service their debt, these governments often ended in epic balance of payments crises and renounced their electoral programs while embracing stabilization and fiscal austerity. This reflects the fact that economic growth and distribution in peripheral economies are fundamentally balance-of-payments-constrained. How can we understand variation in the form of distributive strategies advanced by left parties in government if they are subject to balance of payments constraints? And how can we understand the emergence of different growth models within those constraints? This article contributes to understanding the politics of peripheral growth models by studying the variation in left government distributive and growth strategies in the context of balance-of-payments (BoP) constrained growth. While the BoP constraints are real and challenging and the push for monetary and fiscal responsibility has been blunt, we argue that the extent to which governing left parties build linkages with grassroots and subordinated groups, and extant institutional architectures, allow spaces for political agency that leftist governments can use to pursue distinct distributive and growth strategies. In turn, these strategies allow for diverse ways of managing the macroeconomic implications of the BoP constraints.","PeriodicalId":46999,"journal":{"name":"Competition & Change","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Competition & Change","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294241237366","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Leftist governments in peripheral economies have usually faced problems fulfilling their distributive mandate. Because of their inability to earn foreign exchange to pay for imports or service their debt, these governments often ended in epic balance of payments crises and renounced their electoral programs while embracing stabilization and fiscal austerity. This reflects the fact that economic growth and distribution in peripheral economies are fundamentally balance-of-payments-constrained. How can we understand variation in the form of distributive strategies advanced by left parties in government if they are subject to balance of payments constraints? And how can we understand the emergence of different growth models within those constraints? This article contributes to understanding the politics of peripheral growth models by studying the variation in left government distributive and growth strategies in the context of balance-of-payments (BoP) constrained growth. While the BoP constraints are real and challenging and the push for monetary and fiscal responsibility has been blunt, we argue that the extent to which governing left parties build linkages with grassroots and subordinated groups, and extant institutional architectures, allow spaces for political agency that leftist governments can use to pursue distinct distributive and growth strategies. In turn, these strategies allow for diverse ways of managing the macroeconomic implications of the BoP constraints.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智利和乌拉圭的左派政府、分配战略以及受国际收支制约的增长政治
外围经济体的左派政府在履行其分配使命时通常会遇到困难。由于无法赚取外汇来支付进口或偿还债务,这些政府往往以史诗般的国际收支危机收场,并在接受稳定和财政紧缩政策的同时放弃了选举计划。这反映了外围经济体的经济增长和分配从根本上受制于国际收支这一事实。如果政府中的左翼政党受到国际收支的制约,我们又如何理解它们所提出的分配战略形式的变化呢?我们又如何理解在这些限制条件下出现的不同增长模式?本文通过研究国际收支(BoP)约束下左翼政府分配和增长战略的变化,有助于理解外围增长模式的政治学意义。虽然国际收支约束是真实的、具有挑战性的,对货币和财政责任的推动也是钝化的,但我们认为,执政的左翼政党与基层和从属群体建立联系的程度,以及现有的制度架构,为左翼政府提供了政治代理空间,使其可以利用这些空间来推行不同的分配和增长战略。反过来,这些战略又允许以不同的方式管理赤贫制约因素对宏观经济的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Making “strategic autonomy” rhyme with “fiscal austerity?” Unresolved conflicts of (geo)economic ideas in EU infrastructure policy Erratum to “An international interface: Democratic planning in a global context” The regulator’s trilemma: On the limits of technocratic governance in digital markets The invisible leverage of the rich. Absentee debtors and their hedge funds Partial organization and economic coordination: The gradual re-organization of Finnish corporatism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1