A Bayesian change-point detection approach to the economic evaluation of risky projects: an application to healthcare technology assessment

Daniele Bregantini, Laetitia H M Schmitt, Jacco J J Thijssen
{"title":"A Bayesian change-point detection approach to the economic evaluation of risky projects: an application to healthcare technology assessment","authors":"Daniele Bregantini, Laetitia H M Schmitt, Jacco J J Thijssen","doi":"10.1093/jrsssa/qnad129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> We propose a Bayesian hypothesis testing framework that allows for the assessment of evidence collected during a clinical trial about the cost-effectiveness of a healthcare technology. The model exploits a Bayesian updating rule that makes the link between the evidence collected in clinical research and the expected payoffs of adoption to the healthcare system. The framework takes into account the cost of decision errors in the payoff function, allowing the decision maker to compute the cost of taking a decision when evidence is far from the optimal decision triggers. We show, using a real-world cost-effectiveness study based on clinical trial evidence, how rules derived from a sequential adaptive design approach can lead to quicker decisions when compared to the value of information decision framework. Our application shows that a sequential approach has the potential to lead to quicker decisions, higher payoffs, and better health outcomes.","PeriodicalId":517419,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (Statistics in Society)","volume":"99 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (Statistics in Society)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrsssa/qnad129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract We propose a Bayesian hypothesis testing framework that allows for the assessment of evidence collected during a clinical trial about the cost-effectiveness of a healthcare technology. The model exploits a Bayesian updating rule that makes the link between the evidence collected in clinical research and the expected payoffs of adoption to the healthcare system. The framework takes into account the cost of decision errors in the payoff function, allowing the decision maker to compute the cost of taking a decision when evidence is far from the optimal decision triggers. We show, using a real-world cost-effectiveness study based on clinical trial evidence, how rules derived from a sequential adaptive design approach can lead to quicker decisions when compared to the value of information decision framework. Our application shows that a sequential approach has the potential to lead to quicker decisions, higher payoffs, and better health outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对风险项目进行经济评估的贝叶斯变化点检测方法:在医疗保健技术评估中的应用
摘要 我们提出了一个贝叶斯假设检验框架,可用于评估临床试验期间收集的有关医疗保健技术成本效益的证据。该模型利用贝叶斯更新规则,将临床研究中收集的证据与医疗系统采用该技术的预期回报联系起来。该框架考虑了报酬函数中的决策失误成本,允许决策者在证据与最优决策触发点相差甚远时计算决策成本。我们通过一项基于临床试验证据的真实世界成本效益研究表明,与信息价值决策框架相比,从顺序自适应设计方法中得出的规则如何能更快地做出决策。我们的应用表明,顺序方法有可能带来更快的决策、更高的回报和更好的健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On partial likelihood Using proxy pattern-mixture models to explain bias in estimates of COVID-19 vaccine uptake from two large surveys Relaxing the exclusion restriction in shift-share instrumental variable estimation Grace periods in comparative effectiveness studies of sustained treatments Statistics did not prove that the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market was the early epicentre of the COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1