Current Status of Integrated Palliative Care Among Parkinson Foundation Centers of Excellence in the United States.

IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurology. Clinical practice Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200278
Umer Akbar, Sandhya Seshadri, Megan Dini, Peggy Auinger, Sally A Norton, Jodi S Holtrop, Benzi M Kluger
{"title":"Current Status of Integrated Palliative Care Among Parkinson Foundation Centers of Excellence in the United States.","authors":"Umer Akbar, Sandhya Seshadri, Megan Dini, Peggy Auinger, Sally A Norton, Jodi S Holtrop, Benzi M Kluger","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>To assess the current structures, knowledge, and readiness to integrate palliative care (PC) into Parkinson disease (PD) care at Parkinson's Foundation Centers of Excellence (COE) in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three unique surveys were administered to health care professionals/staff at COEs to assess PC (1) resources, (2) knowledge and comfort, (3) clinical experience and processes, (4) barriers, and (5) readiness for implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Response rates for the 3 surveys were 97%, 98%, and 56%. In total, 41% of COEs have access to outpatient PC specialists, 71% have mental health counseling, 82% have support groups, and 9% had very limited PC resources. Overall, 74% of providers believed persons with advanced PD should receive PC, and knowledge of PC fundamentals was good across providers. For high-needs persons with PD (PWP), only 16% of physicians and 24% of advanced practice providers made referrals to PC specialists ≥75% of the time, while 9% and 16% never made such referrals. Limited time, space, financing, and staffing were seen as major barriers to PC implementation. In total, 37% of providers were satisfied with their COE's ability to provide PC services. Most COEs report a culture open to change and appear well-positioned to implement PC in a more comprehensive fashion.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These results demonstrate the emergence of structures and processes to provide PC to persons with PD at COEs. They also identify concrete opportunities to strengthen integration of PC through educational, quality improvement, and advocacy efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10915817/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology. Clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: To assess the current structures, knowledge, and readiness to integrate palliative care (PC) into Parkinson disease (PD) care at Parkinson's Foundation Centers of Excellence (COE) in the United States.

Methods: Three unique surveys were administered to health care professionals/staff at COEs to assess PC (1) resources, (2) knowledge and comfort, (3) clinical experience and processes, (4) barriers, and (5) readiness for implementation.

Results: Response rates for the 3 surveys were 97%, 98%, and 56%. In total, 41% of COEs have access to outpatient PC specialists, 71% have mental health counseling, 82% have support groups, and 9% had very limited PC resources. Overall, 74% of providers believed persons with advanced PD should receive PC, and knowledge of PC fundamentals was good across providers. For high-needs persons with PD (PWP), only 16% of physicians and 24% of advanced practice providers made referrals to PC specialists ≥75% of the time, while 9% and 16% never made such referrals. Limited time, space, financing, and staffing were seen as major barriers to PC implementation. In total, 37% of providers were satisfied with their COE's ability to provide PC services. Most COEs report a culture open to change and appear well-positioned to implement PC in a more comprehensive fashion.

Discussion: These results demonstrate the emergence of structures and processes to provide PC to persons with PD at COEs. They also identify concrete opportunities to strengthen integration of PC through educational, quality improvement, and advocacy efforts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国帕金森基金会卓越中心的综合姑息治疗现状。
背景和目标:评估美国帕金森基金会卓越中心(COE)将姑息关怀(PC)纳入帕金森病(PD)治疗的现有结构、知识和准备情况:方法:对帕金森基金会卓越中心(COE)的医护专业人员/工作人员进行了三项独特的调查,以评估姑息关怀(PC)的(1)资源、(2)知识和舒适度、(3)临床经验和流程、(4)障碍和(5)实施准备情况:三项调查的回复率分别为 97%、98% 和 56%。总共有 41% 的 COE 可以获得 PC 专家的门诊服务,71% 的 COE 有心理健康咨询,82% 的 COE 有支持小组,9% 的 COE 的 PC 资源非常有限。总体而言,74% 的医疗服务提供者认为晚期帕金森病患者应该接受 PC 治疗,而且各医疗服务提供者对 PC 基础知识的了解程度良好。对于高需求的帕金森氏症患者(PWP),仅有 16% 的医生和 24% 的高级医疗服务提供者在≥75%的时间内向帕金森氏症专家进行了转诊,而 9% 和 16% 的医生和服务提供者从未进行过此类转诊。有限的时间、空间、资金和人员配置被视为实施 PC 的主要障碍。总共有 37% 的医疗服务提供者对其 COE 提供 PC 服务的能力表示满意。大多数 COE 都表示其文化乐于变革,似乎有能力以更全面的方式实施 PC:讨论:这些结果表明,COE 已经建立了为帕金森病患者提供个人护理服务的结构和流程。这些结果还指出了通过教育、质量改进和宣传工作加强个人护理整合的具体机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurology. Clinical practice
Neurology. Clinical practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Neurology® Genetics is an online open access journal publishing peer-reviewed reports in the field of neurogenetics. The journal publishes original articles in all areas of neurogenetics including rare and common genetic variations, genotype-phenotype correlations, outlier phenotypes as a result of mutations in known disease genes, and genetic variations with a putative link to diseases. Articles include studies reporting on genetic disease risk, pharmacogenomics, and results of gene-based clinical trials (viral, ASO, etc.). Genetically engineered model systems are not a primary focus of Neurology® Genetics, but studies using model systems for treatment trials, including well-powered studies reporting negative results, are welcome.
期刊最新文献
An Interprofessional Team for Disease-Modifying Therapy in Alzheimer Disease Implementation. Virtual Compared With In-Person Neurologic Examination Study. A General Neurologist's Practical Diagnostic Algorithm for Atypical Parkinsonian Disorders: A Consensus Statement. Access to Care and Health-Related Quality of Life in Multiple Sclerosis. Antiseizure Medication Withdrawal, Risk of Epilepsy, and Longterm EEG Trends in Acute Symptomatic Seizures or Epileptic EEG Patterns.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1