Schneiderian First Rank Symptoms Significantly Predict a Dissociative Disorder Diagnosis in Psychiatric In-Patients.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Trauma & Dissociation Pub Date : 2024-03-08 DOI:10.1080/15299732.2024.2326515
Christa Krüger, Lizelle Fletcher
{"title":"Schneiderian First Rank Symptoms Significantly Predict a Dissociative Disorder Diagnosis in Psychiatric In-Patients.","authors":"Christa Krüger, Lizelle Fletcher","doi":"10.1080/15299732.2024.2326515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous empirical studies on the relationship between psychotic symptoms and dissociative disorders focused on auditory hallucinations only or employed limited statistical analyses. We investigated whether the frequency of Schneiderian first rank symptoms (FRS) predicts the presence or absence of a dissociative disorder (DD). Psychiatric in-patients (<i>n</i> = 116) completed measures of dissociation, FRS and general psychological distress (GPD). DD diagnoses were confirmed by multidisciplinary teams or administering the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Dissociative Disorders-Revised (SCID-D-R). The FRS were recorded in the Multidimensional Inventory of Dissociation (MID) and a mean score obtained for 35 relevant items: Voices arguing, voices commenting, made feelings, made impulses, made actions, influences on body, thought withdrawal, and thought insertion. A global severity index (GSI) of GPD was obtained from the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R). Logistic regression models examined whether FRS predict diagnostic classification of patients under a DD (<i>n</i> = 16) or not (<i>n</i> = 100), controlling for GSI. The overall fit of the model was significant (<i>p</i> = .0002). DD was correctly classified using frequency of FRS, controlling for GSI. The latter was moderately associated with FRS (<i>r</i> = 0.56). FRS more than doubled the odds of a DD diagnosis (odds = 2.089; 95% CI = 1.409-3.098; correct classification rate 87.1%). The study provides convincing evidence that FRS are closely related to DDs. FRS should alert clinicians to consider DDs in differential diagnosis of psychiatric in-patients. Future research should analyze whether FRS also predict a diagnosis of schizophrenia or other psychiatric disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":47476,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2024.2326515","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous empirical studies on the relationship between psychotic symptoms and dissociative disorders focused on auditory hallucinations only or employed limited statistical analyses. We investigated whether the frequency of Schneiderian first rank symptoms (FRS) predicts the presence or absence of a dissociative disorder (DD). Psychiatric in-patients (n = 116) completed measures of dissociation, FRS and general psychological distress (GPD). DD diagnoses were confirmed by multidisciplinary teams or administering the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Dissociative Disorders-Revised (SCID-D-R). The FRS were recorded in the Multidimensional Inventory of Dissociation (MID) and a mean score obtained for 35 relevant items: Voices arguing, voices commenting, made feelings, made impulses, made actions, influences on body, thought withdrawal, and thought insertion. A global severity index (GSI) of GPD was obtained from the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R). Logistic regression models examined whether FRS predict diagnostic classification of patients under a DD (n = 16) or not (n = 100), controlling for GSI. The overall fit of the model was significant (p = .0002). DD was correctly classified using frequency of FRS, controlling for GSI. The latter was moderately associated with FRS (r = 0.56). FRS more than doubled the odds of a DD diagnosis (odds = 2.089; 95% CI = 1.409-3.098; correct classification rate 87.1%). The study provides convincing evidence that FRS are closely related to DDs. FRS should alert clinicians to consider DDs in differential diagnosis of psychiatric in-patients. Future research should analyze whether FRS also predict a diagnosis of schizophrenia or other psychiatric disorders.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
施耐德一级症状可显著预测精神病住院患者的分离障碍诊断。
以往有关精神病症状与分离性障碍之间关系的实证研究仅关注幻听,或采用有限的统计分析。我们研究了施耐德一级症状(FRS)的频率是否能预测解离障碍(DD)的存在与否。住院精神病患者(n = 116)完成了解离、FRS 和一般心理困扰(GPD)的测量。DD诊断由多学科团队确认,或通过 DSM-IV 解离障碍结构化临床访谈-修订版(SCID-D-R)进行确认。FRS记录在解离多维量表(MID)中,并获得35个相关项目的平均分:声音争论、声音评论、制造的感觉、制造的冲动、制造的行动、对身体的影响、思想退缩和思想插入。GPD 的总体严重程度指数(GSI)由症状检查表-90-修订版(SCL-90-R)得出。逻辑回归模型检验了 FRS 是否能预测 DD 患者(n = 16)的诊断分类(n = 100),并对 GSI 进行了控制。该模型的整体拟合效果显著(p = .0002)。在控制 GSI 的情况下,使用 FRS 频率对 DD 进行了正确分类。后者与 FRS 呈中度相关(r = 0.56)。FRS 使 DD 诊断几率增加了一倍多(几率 = 2.089;95% CI = 1.409-3.098;正确分类率 87.1%)。该研究提供了令人信服的证据,表明 FRS 与 DD 密切相关。FRS应提醒临床医生在对精神病住院患者进行鉴别诊断时考虑DDs。未来的研究应分析 FRS 是否也能预测精神分裂症或其他精神疾病的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.10%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Correction. Presidential Editorial. The Detection of Invalid Responses Using the Dissociative Experiences Scale-V (DES-V). Dissociative Experiences Among Transgender Women: A Phenomenological Study. A Virtual Reality Simulation to Examine the Relationship Between Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms and Decision-Making in First Responders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1