Intensive Blood Pressure Control After Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-07 DOI:10.1007/s00062-024-01391-6
Mohamed Abuelazm, Yehya Khildj, Ahmed A Ibrahim, Abdelrahman Mahmoud, Ahmed Mazen Amin, Ibrahim Gowaily, Ubaid Khan, Basel Abdelazeem, James Robert Brašić
{"title":"Intensive Blood Pressure Control After Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Mohamed Abuelazm, Yehya Khildj, Ahmed A Ibrahim, Abdelrahman Mahmoud, Ahmed Mazen Amin, Ibrahim Gowaily, Ubaid Khan, Basel Abdelazeem, James Robert Brašić","doi":"10.1007/s00062-024-01391-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Optimal clinical outcome with successful recanalization from endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) requires optimal blood pressure (BP) management. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the intensive BP target (< 140 mm Hg) versus the standard BP target (< 180 mm Hg) after EVT for acute ischemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) obtained from PubMed, Embase Cochrane, Scopus, and WOS until September 7th, 2023. We used the fixed-effect model to report dichotomous outcomes using risk ratio (RR) and continuous outcomes using mean difference (MD), with a 95% confidence interval (CI).</p><p><strong>Prospero id: </strong>CRD42023463206.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included four RCTs with 1559 patients. There was no difference between intensive BP and standard BP targets regarding the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) change after 24 h [MD: 0.44 with 95% CI (0.0, 0.87), P = 0.05]. However, the intensive BP target was significantly associated with a decreased risk of excellent neurological recovery (mRS ≤ 1) [RR: 0.87 with 95% CI (0.76, 0.99), P = 0.03], functional independence (mRS ≤ 2) [RR: 0.81 with 95% CI (0.73, 0.90), P = 0.0001] and independent ambulation (mRS ≤ 3) [RR: 0.85 with 95% CI (0.79, 0.92), P < 0.0001].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An intensive BP target after EVT is associated with worse neurological recovery and significantly decreased rates of functional independence and independent ambulation compared to the standard BP target. Therefore, the intensive BP target should be avoided after EVT for acute ischemic stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":49298,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"563-575"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11339153/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-024-01391-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Optimal clinical outcome with successful recanalization from endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) requires optimal blood pressure (BP) management. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the intensive BP target (< 140 mm Hg) versus the standard BP target (< 180 mm Hg) after EVT for acute ischemic stroke.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) obtained from PubMed, Embase Cochrane, Scopus, and WOS until September 7th, 2023. We used the fixed-effect model to report dichotomous outcomes using risk ratio (RR) and continuous outcomes using mean difference (MD), with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

Prospero id: CRD42023463206.

Results: We included four RCTs with 1559 patients. There was no difference between intensive BP and standard BP targets regarding the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) change after 24 h [MD: 0.44 with 95% CI (0.0, 0.87), P = 0.05]. However, the intensive BP target was significantly associated with a decreased risk of excellent neurological recovery (mRS ≤ 1) [RR: 0.87 with 95% CI (0.76, 0.99), P = 0.03], functional independence (mRS ≤ 2) [RR: 0.81 with 95% CI (0.73, 0.90), P = 0.0001] and independent ambulation (mRS ≤ 3) [RR: 0.85 with 95% CI (0.79, 0.92), P < 0.0001].

Conclusions: An intensive BP target after EVT is associated with worse neurological recovery and significantly decreased rates of functional independence and independent ambulation compared to the standard BP target. Therefore, the intensive BP target should be avoided after EVT for acute ischemic stroke.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性缺血性脑卒中血管内血栓切除术后的强化血压控制:系统综述与 Meta 分析。
背景和目的:血管内血栓切除术(EVT)成功再通的最佳临床结果需要最佳血压(BP)管理。我们旨在评估强化血压目标的有效性和安全性:我们对截至 2023 年 9 月 7 日从 PubMed、Embase Cochrane、Scopus 和 WOS 获取的随机对照试验(RCT)证据进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。我们采用固定效应模型,以风险比(RR)报告二分结果,以平均差(MD)报告连续结果,并附带95%置信区间(CI):CRD42023463206.Results:结果:我们纳入了四项研究,共 1559 名患者。在 24 小时后美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)的变化方面,强化血压目标值与标准血压目标值之间没有差异[MD:0.44,95% CI (0.0,0.87),P = 0.05]。然而,强化血压目标与神经功能极佳恢复(mRS ≤ 1)[RR:0.87,95% CI(0.76,0.99),P = 0.03]、功能独立(mRS ≤ 2)[RR:0.81,95% CI(0.73,0.90),P = 0.0001]和独立行走(mRS ≤ 3)[RR:0.85,95% CI(0.79,0.92),P] 的风险降低显著相关:与标准血压目标值相比,EVT 后的强化血压目标值与神经功能恢复较差、功能独立率和独立行走率显著降低有关。因此,急性缺血性卒中 EVT 后应避免使用强化血压目标值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neuroradiology
Clinical Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
106
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Neuroradiology provides current information, original contributions, and reviews in the field of neuroradiology. An interdisciplinary approach is accomplished by diagnostic and therapeutic contributions related to associated subjects. The international coverage and relevance of the journal is underlined by its being the official journal of the German, Swiss, and Austrian Societies of Neuroradiology.
期刊最新文献
Epstein-Barr Virus Encephalitis Mimicking Herpes Encephalitis On Neuroimaging: A Case Report. Non-Stenotic Carotid Plaques and Rate of DWI-positive MRI in Patients with Lower-Risk Transient or Persistent Minor Neurologic Events: DOUBT Sub Study. Hyperdense Middle Cerebral Artery Sign as a Predictor of First-Pass Recanalization and Favorable Outcomes in Direct Thrombectomy Patients. Microstructural Characteristics of Cervical Spinal Cord Using High Angular Resolution Diffusion Imaging (HARDI) and Tractography in Healthy Subjects. Long and Large Stentrievers Improve Reperfusion Outcomes in Acute Intracranial Terminal Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion: Interim Results of the Rossetti Registry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1