Masks wearing off: Changing effects of face masks on trustworthiness over time.

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Perception Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-07 DOI:10.1177/03010066241237430
Julian A Oldmeadow, Taylor Gogan
{"title":"Masks wearing off: Changing effects of face masks on trustworthiness over time.","authors":"Julian A Oldmeadow, Taylor Gogan","doi":"10.1177/03010066241237430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During the global COVID-19 pandemic, the wearing of face masks became a common practice, raising questions about how masks affect perceptions of and behaviour towards others. Numerous studies have explored the impact of face masks on perceptions of trustworthiness, but results have been mixed and it remains unclear whether masks influence perceptions via their social meaning or their effects on facial appearance. In this study, Australian participants (<i>N </i>= 363) rated a series of faces which were either masked, unmasked, or occluded by a non-mask object (computer) in terms of perceived trustworthiness in 2020, 2022, or 2023. The apparent trustworthiness of unmasked faces remained stable across years, but masked faces were rated significantly more trustworthy in 2020 compared to 2022 and 2023. Furthermore, ratings of masked faces, but not unmasked faces, were correlated with participants' attitudes towards wearing masks. Faces occluded by a non-mask object were perceived to be less trustworthy than masked faces. Together, results strongly suggest the increase in perceived trustworthiness of masked faces reported in numerous studies conducted during COVID-19 were driven by positive social meanings around mask wearing rather than by their effect on facial appearance.</p>","PeriodicalId":49708,"journal":{"name":"Perception","volume":" ","pages":"343-355"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11088216/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perception","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03010066241237430","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the global COVID-19 pandemic, the wearing of face masks became a common practice, raising questions about how masks affect perceptions of and behaviour towards others. Numerous studies have explored the impact of face masks on perceptions of trustworthiness, but results have been mixed and it remains unclear whether masks influence perceptions via their social meaning or their effects on facial appearance. In this study, Australian participants (N = 363) rated a series of faces which were either masked, unmasked, or occluded by a non-mask object (computer) in terms of perceived trustworthiness in 2020, 2022, or 2023. The apparent trustworthiness of unmasked faces remained stable across years, but masked faces were rated significantly more trustworthy in 2020 compared to 2022 and 2023. Furthermore, ratings of masked faces, but not unmasked faces, were correlated with participants' attitudes towards wearing masks. Faces occluded by a non-mask object were perceived to be less trustworthy than masked faces. Together, results strongly suggest the increase in perceived trustworthiness of masked faces reported in numerous studies conducted during COVID-19 were driven by positive social meanings around mask wearing rather than by their effect on facial appearance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面具的磨损:面具对可信度的影响随时间而改变。
在 COVID-19 全球大流行期间,戴口罩成为一种普遍做法,这引发了口罩如何影响对他人的看法和行为的问题。许多研究探讨了口罩对可信度感知的影响,但结果不一,口罩是通过其社会意义还是通过其对面部外观的影响来影响感知的,目前仍不清楚。在这项研究中,澳大利亚的参与者(363 人)在 2020 年、2022 年或 2023 年对一系列戴面具、未戴面具或被非面具对象(电脑)遮挡的人脸的可信度进行了评分。未蒙面面孔的可信度在各年保持稳定,但蒙面面孔在 2020 年的可信度明显高于 2022 年和 2023 年。此外,受试者对蒙面面孔的评分与受试者对戴面具的态度有关,而对未蒙面面孔的评分与受试者对戴面具的态度无关。与戴面具的人脸相比,被非面具物体遮挡的人脸更不值得信任。总之,研究结果有力地表明,在 COVID-19 期间进行的大量研究中报告的戴面具面孔可信度的提高是由戴面具的积极社会意义驱动的,而不是由其对面部外观的影响驱动的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Perception
Perception 医学-心理学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
74
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Perception is a traditional print journal covering all areas of the perceptual sciences, but with a strong historical emphasis on perceptual illusions. Perception is a subscription journal, free for authors to publish their research as a Standard Article, Short Report or Short & Sweet. The journal also publishes Editorials and Book Reviews.
期刊最新文献
Re-examining our evolutionary propensities toward snakes: Insights from children's inattentional blindness. Face to face: Comparing ChatGPT with human performance on face matching. The overestimation of gaze for horizontal, vertical, and diagonal fixation points. Crossmodal to unimodal transfer of temporal perceptual learning. The Ames room and the misunderstood versions and depictions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1