Intraoperative effects of an alveolar recruitment manoeuvre in patients undergoing laparoscopic colon surgery

R. Mato-Búa, A. Prado-Rodríguez, D. López-López, P. Rama-Maceiras, N. Molins-Gauna, F. Álvarez-Refojo
{"title":"Intraoperative effects of an alveolar recruitment manoeuvre in patients undergoing laparoscopic colon surgery","authors":"R. Mato-Búa,&nbsp;A. Prado-Rodríguez,&nbsp;D. López-López,&nbsp;P. Rama-Maceiras,&nbsp;N. Molins-Gauna,&nbsp;F. Álvarez-Refojo","doi":"10.1016/j.redare.2024.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Pulmonary atelectasis is common in patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery under general anaesthesia, which increases the risk of perioperative respiratory complications. Alveolar recruitment manoeuvres (ARM) are used to open up the lung parenchyma with atelectasis, although the duration of their benefit has not been clearly established. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of an ARM in laparoscopic colon surgery, the duration of response over time, and its haemodynamic impact.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twenty-five patients undergoing laparoscopic colon surgery were included. After anaesthetic induction and initiation of surgery with pneumoperitoneum, an ARM was performed, and then optimal PEEP determined. Respiratory mechanics and gas exchange variables, and haemodynamic parameters, were analysed before the manoeuvre and periodically over the following 90 min.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three patients were excluded for surgical reasons. The alveolar arterial oxygen gradient went from 94.3 (62.3−117.8) mmHg before to 60.7 (29.6−91.0) mmHg after the manoeuvre (P &lt; .05). This difference was maintained during the 90 min of the study. Dynamic compliance of the respiratory system went from 31.3 ml/cmH<sub>2</sub>O (26.1–39.2) before the manoeuvre to 46.1 ml/cmH<sub>2</sub>O (37.5−53.5) after the manoeuvre (P &lt; .05). This difference was maintained for 60 min. No significant changes were identified in any of the haemodynamic variables studied.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In patients undergoing laparoscopic colon surgery, performing an intraoperative ARM improves the mechanics of the respiratory system and oxygenation, without associated haemodynamic compromise. The benefit of these manoeuvres lasts for at least one hour.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94196,"journal":{"name":"Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion","volume":"71 3","pages":"Pages 151-159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2341192924000593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Pulmonary atelectasis is common in patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery under general anaesthesia, which increases the risk of perioperative respiratory complications. Alveolar recruitment manoeuvres (ARM) are used to open up the lung parenchyma with atelectasis, although the duration of their benefit has not been clearly established. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of an ARM in laparoscopic colon surgery, the duration of response over time, and its haemodynamic impact.

Methods

Twenty-five patients undergoing laparoscopic colon surgery were included. After anaesthetic induction and initiation of surgery with pneumoperitoneum, an ARM was performed, and then optimal PEEP determined. Respiratory mechanics and gas exchange variables, and haemodynamic parameters, were analysed before the manoeuvre and periodically over the following 90 min.

Results

Three patients were excluded for surgical reasons. The alveolar arterial oxygen gradient went from 94.3 (62.3−117.8) mmHg before to 60.7 (29.6−91.0) mmHg after the manoeuvre (P < .05). This difference was maintained during the 90 min of the study. Dynamic compliance of the respiratory system went from 31.3 ml/cmH2O (26.1–39.2) before the manoeuvre to 46.1 ml/cmH2O (37.5−53.5) after the manoeuvre (P < .05). This difference was maintained for 60 min. No significant changes were identified in any of the haemodynamic variables studied.

Conclusion

In patients undergoing laparoscopic colon surgery, performing an intraoperative ARM improves the mechanics of the respiratory system and oxygenation, without associated haemodynamic compromise. The benefit of these manoeuvres lasts for at least one hour.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在接受腹腔镜结肠手术的患者中使用肺泡扩张操作的术中效果。
导言:在全身麻醉下接受腹腔镜腹部手术的患者中,肺部偏流很常见,这会增加围手术期呼吸系统并发症的风险。肺泡募集操作(ARM)可用于打开有肺偏流的肺实质,但其益处的持续时间尚未明确确定。本研究的目的是确定腹腔镜结肠手术中肺泡扩张术的有效性、反应持续时间及其对血流动力学的影响:研究纳入了 25 名接受腹腔镜结肠手术的患者。麻醉诱导和腹腔积气手术开始后,进行 ARM,然后确定最佳 PEEP。在操作前和随后的 90 分钟内定期分析呼吸力学和气体交换变量以及血流动力学参数:结果:三名患者因手术原因被排除在外。肺泡动脉血氧梯度从操作前的 94.3 (62.3-117.8) mmHg 降至操作后的 60.7 (29.6-91.0) mmHg(P < .05)。这一差异在 90 分钟的研究过程中一直保持不变。呼吸系统的动态顺应性从操作前的 31.3 ml/cmH2O(26.1-39.2)升至操作后的 46.1 ml/cmH2O(37.5-53.5)(P < .05)。这一差异保持了 60 分钟。研究中未发现任何血流动力学变量发生重大变化:结论:对于接受腹腔镜结肠手术的患者,术中进行 ARM 可改善呼吸系统的力学和氧合,而不会对血流动力学造成影响。这些操作的益处可持续至少一小时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Blood recirculation during continuous renal replacement therapy due to a thrombus in the inferior vena cava. Incidence and risk factors of chronic post-thoracic surgery pain: A retrospective study. Quantitative analysis of genicular nerve block spread and variability: Anatomical correlations and clinical implications. Simultaneous cardiac perforation and left pneumothorax as complications of temporary pacemaker probe. Sonoanatomy of the difficult airway. A case-control study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1