Towards a reliable neural biomarker for predicting response to non-invasive brain stimulation in the treatment of depression

IF 4.9 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2024-03-07 DOI:10.1016/j.cobeha.2024.101369
Emmet McNickle , Lamia Tadjine , Kathy Ruddy
{"title":"Towards a reliable neural biomarker for predicting response to non-invasive brain stimulation in the treatment of depression","authors":"Emmet McNickle ,&nbsp;Lamia Tadjine ,&nbsp;Kathy Ruddy","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2024.101369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) approaches such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are rapidly emerging as effective and well-tolerated treatments for depression. With the most recent head-to-head studies demonstrating equivalence in clinical efficacy between rTMS, tDCS and widely used pharmaceutical antidepressants, there is urgent need for a paradigm shift towards its inclusion as a low-cost, low-risk frontline treatment for depression. Here, we provide a narrative review outlining barriers currently impeding translation of NIBS approaches into large-scale clinical use, with a view to developing a neural biomarker that could provide early stratification of patients as potential responders or non-responders. We describe how the TMS-evoked potential provides a marker of cortical excitability that could be used as a baseline predictor of whether the NIBS user will derive benefit from approaches tailored to achieve neuromodulation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 101369"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154624000202/pdfft?md5=0eb6d9126d7e20d4157d61338e2187fb&pid=1-s2.0-S2352154624000202-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154624000202","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) approaches such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are rapidly emerging as effective and well-tolerated treatments for depression. With the most recent head-to-head studies demonstrating equivalence in clinical efficacy between rTMS, tDCS and widely used pharmaceutical antidepressants, there is urgent need for a paradigm shift towards its inclusion as a low-cost, low-risk frontline treatment for depression. Here, we provide a narrative review outlining barriers currently impeding translation of NIBS approaches into large-scale clinical use, with a view to developing a neural biomarker that could provide early stratification of patients as potential responders or non-responders. We describe how the TMS-evoked potential provides a marker of cortical excitability that could be used as a baseline predictor of whether the NIBS user will derive benefit from approaches tailored to achieve neuromodulation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发可靠的神经生物标志物,用于预测对治疗抑郁症的非侵入性脑部刺激的反应
重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)和经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)等非侵入性脑刺激(NIBS)方法正迅速成为有效且耐受性良好的抑郁症治疗方法。最新的头对头研究表明,经颅磁刺激、经颅直流电刺激和广泛使用的药物抗抑郁剂的临床疗效相当,因此迫切需要转变治疗模式,将其作为低成本、低风险的一线抑郁症治疗方法。在此,我们通过叙述性综述概述了目前阻碍将 NIBS 方法转化为大规模临床应用的障碍,以期开发出一种神经生物标志物,及早将患者分层为潜在应答者或非应答者。我们描述了 TMS 诱发电位如何提供皮质兴奋性的标记,该标记可用作 NIBS 用户是否能从为实现神经调节而定制的方法中获益的基线预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Neuroscience-Cognitive Neuroscience
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
2.00%
发文量
135
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences is a systematic, integrative review journal that provides a unique and educational platform for updates on the expanding volume of information published in the field of behavioral sciences.
期刊最新文献
A light at the end of the axon: genetically encoded fluorescent indicators shine light on the dopamine system Dopaminergic computations for perceptual decisions From sensory motor and perceptual development to primary consciousness in the fetus: converging neural, behavioral, and imaging correlates of cognition-mediated emergent transitions Nonsynaptic encoding of behavior by neuropeptides Stress-free indulgence: indulge adaptively to promote goal pursuit and well-being
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1