Using artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: An essential productivity tool

Mohamed Khalifa , Mona Albadawy
{"title":"Using artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: An essential productivity tool","authors":"Mohamed Khalifa ,&nbsp;Mona Albadawy","doi":"10.1016/j.cmpbup.2024.100145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Academic writing is an essential component of research, characterized by structured expression of ideas, data-driven arguments, and logical reasoning. However, it poses challenges such as handling vast amounts of information and complex ideas. The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into academic writing has become increasingly important, offering solutions to these challenges. This review aims to explore specific domains where AI significantly supports academic writing.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic review of literature from databases like PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar, published since 2019, was conducted. Studies were included based on relevance to AI's application in academic writing and research, focusing on writing assistance, grammar improvement, structure optimization, and other related aspects.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The search identified 24 studies through which six core domains were identified where AI helps academic writing and research: 1) facilitating idea generation and research design, 2) improving content and structuring, 3) supporting literature review and synthesis, 4) enhancing data management and analysis, 5) supporting editing, review, and publishing, and 6) assisting in communication, outreach, and ethical compliance. ChatGPT has shown substantial potential in these areas, though challenges like maintaining academic integrity and balancing AI use with human insight remain.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion and recommendations</h3><p>AI significantly revolutionises academic writing and research across various domains. Recommendations include broader integration of AI tools in research workflows, emphasizing ethical and transparent use, providing adequate training for researchers, and maintaining a balance between AI utility and human insight. Ongoing research and development are essential to address emerging challenges and ethical considerations in AI's application in academia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72670,"journal":{"name":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine update","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666990024000120/pdfft?md5=69cd44e1ee12e7efa2147c0319eb0030&pid=1-s2.0-S2666990024000120-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine update","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666990024000120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Academic writing is an essential component of research, characterized by structured expression of ideas, data-driven arguments, and logical reasoning. However, it poses challenges such as handling vast amounts of information and complex ideas. The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into academic writing has become increasingly important, offering solutions to these challenges. This review aims to explore specific domains where AI significantly supports academic writing.

Methods

A systematic review of literature from databases like PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar, published since 2019, was conducted. Studies were included based on relevance to AI's application in academic writing and research, focusing on writing assistance, grammar improvement, structure optimization, and other related aspects.

Results

The search identified 24 studies through which six core domains were identified where AI helps academic writing and research: 1) facilitating idea generation and research design, 2) improving content and structuring, 3) supporting literature review and synthesis, 4) enhancing data management and analysis, 5) supporting editing, review, and publishing, and 6) assisting in communication, outreach, and ethical compliance. ChatGPT has shown substantial potential in these areas, though challenges like maintaining academic integrity and balancing AI use with human insight remain.

Conclusion and recommendations

AI significantly revolutionises academic writing and research across various domains. Recommendations include broader integration of AI tools in research workflows, emphasizing ethical and transparent use, providing adequate training for researchers, and maintaining a balance between AI utility and human insight. Ongoing research and development are essential to address emerging challenges and ethical considerations in AI's application in academia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在学术写作和研究中使用人工智能:必不可少的生产力工具
背景学术写作是研究工作的重要组成部分,其特点是有条理地表达观点、数据驱动论证和逻辑推理。然而,它也带来了一些挑战,如处理海量信息和复杂观点。将人工智能(AI)融入学术写作变得越来越重要,为这些挑战提供了解决方案。本综述旨在探讨人工智能在哪些具体领域为学术写作提供了重要支持。方法对PubMed、Embase和Google Scholar等数据库中2019年以来发表的文献进行了系统综述。根据人工智能在学术写作和研究中应用的相关性纳入研究,重点关注写作辅助、语法改进、结构优化和其他相关方面。结果检索发现了24项研究,通过这些研究确定了人工智能有助于学术写作和研究的六个核心领域:1) 促进想法的产生和研究设计;2) 改进内容和结构;3) 支持文献综述和合成;4) 加强数据管理和分析;5) 支持编辑、审查和出版;6) 协助交流、推广和伦理合规。ChatGPT 已在这些领域显示出巨大的潜力,尽管仍面临着保持学术诚信以及平衡人工智能的使用与人类洞察力等挑战。建议包括在研究工作流程中更广泛地整合人工智能工具,强调使用的道德性和透明度,为研究人员提供充分的培训,以及在人工智能的实用性和人类洞察力之间保持平衡。要解决人工智能在学术界应用过程中新出现的挑战和伦理问题,持续的研究和开发至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Fostering digital health literacy to enhance trust and improve health outcomes Machine learning from real data: A mental health registry case study ResfEANet: ResNet-fused External Attention Network for Tuberculosis Diagnosis using Chest X-ray Images Role-playing recovery in social virtual worlds: Adult use of child avatars as PTSD therapy Comparative evaluation of low-cost 3D scanning devices for ear acquisition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1