Are larger cities more central in urban networks: A meta-analysis

IF 2.5 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Global Networks-A Journal of Transnational Affairs Pub Date : 2023-12-02 DOI:10.1111/glob.12467
Xiaomeng Li, Zachary P. Neal
{"title":"Are larger cities more central in urban networks: A meta-analysis","authors":"Xiaomeng Li,&nbsp;Zachary P. Neal","doi":"10.1111/glob.12467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As cities develop more and longer-range external relations, some have challenged the long-standing notion that population size indicates a city's power in its urban system. But are population size and network centrality really independent properties in practice, or do larger cities tend to be more central in urban networks? To answer this question, we conducted a systematic literature search and meta-analysed 41 reported correlations between city size and degree centrality. The results show that population size and degree centrality are significantly and positively correlated for cities across various urban systems (<i>r</i> = 0.77), but the correlation varies by network scale and type. The size-centrality association is weaker for global economic and transportation networks\n(<i>r</i> = 0.43), and stronger for non-global social and communication networks (<i>r</i> = 0.91). This clarifies seemingly contradictory predictions in the literature regarding the association betweensize and centrality for cities.</p>","PeriodicalId":47882,"journal":{"name":"Global Networks-A Journal of Transnational Affairs","volume":"24 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/glob.12467","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Networks-A Journal of Transnational Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/glob.12467","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As cities develop more and longer-range external relations, some have challenged the long-standing notion that population size indicates a city's power in its urban system. But are population size and network centrality really independent properties in practice, or do larger cities tend to be more central in urban networks? To answer this question, we conducted a systematic literature search and meta-analysed 41 reported correlations between city size and degree centrality. The results show that population size and degree centrality are significantly and positively correlated for cities across various urban systems (r = 0.77), but the correlation varies by network scale and type. The size-centrality association is weaker for global economic and transportation networks (r = 0.43), and stronger for non-global social and communication networks (r = 0.91). This clarifies seemingly contradictory predictions in the literature regarding the association betweensize and centrality for cities.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大城市在城市网络中是否更重要?荟萃分析
随着城市发展更多、更长距离的对外关系,一些人对长期以来认为人口数量表明城市在其城市体系中的力量的观点提出了质疑。但是,在实践中,人口规模和网络中心性真的是独立的属性吗?为了回答这个问题,我们进行了系统的文献检索,并对 41 篇报道的城市规模与度中心性之间的相关性进行了元分析。结果表明,在不同的城市体系中,人口规模与度中心性呈显著正相关(r = 0.77),但相关性因网络规模和类型而异。全球经济和交通网络的规模-中心度关联性较弱(r = 0.43),而非全球社会和通信网络的规模-中心度关联性较强(r = 0.91)。这澄清了文献中关于城市规模与中心性之间关联的看似矛盾的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Digital Technologies on the Transnational Aging Experience of Older Hong Kongers The Welfare System in the Face of War Refugees From Ukraine: The Experience of Social Workers in Poland Changed Reality, Changed Positions: The Case Study of Eritrean Women Refugees in Times of Global Pandemic Issue Information Promoting Good Governance Through Transnational Projects: A Study of Swedish Funding in Russia 1991–2005
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1