Differences Between NSA 94–106 and IEEE Std. 299 Setups for Low-Frequency Magnetic Shielding Effectiveness Characterization: A Study Using Numerical Simulations

IF 1 Q4 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC IEEE Letters on Electromagnetic Compatibility Practice and Applications Pub Date : 2024-01-18 DOI:10.1109/LEMCPA.2024.3355849
Lirim Koraqi;Tim Claeys;Johan Catrysse;Davy Pissoort
{"title":"Differences Between NSA 94–106 and IEEE Std. 299 Setups for Low-Frequency Magnetic Shielding Effectiveness Characterization: A Study Using Numerical Simulations","authors":"Lirim Koraqi;Tim Claeys;Johan Catrysse;Davy Pissoort","doi":"10.1109/LEMCPA.2024.3355849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This letter employs simulation findings to demonstrate the practical reasons why the low-frequency magnetic shielding effectiveness (SE) is different when characterized using two parallel loops (NSA 94-106) or two coplanar loops (IEEE Std. 299). It shows how the change in the loop radius impacts the SE for the NSA 94–106 setup rather than for the IEEE 299 one. The observation is rooted in the difference of the wave impedance for both scenarios. Additionally, this letter elucidates the reason behind the wave impedance difference.","PeriodicalId":100625,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Letters on Electromagnetic Compatibility Practice and Applications","volume":"6 1","pages":"22-28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Letters on Electromagnetic Compatibility Practice and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10403931/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This letter employs simulation findings to demonstrate the practical reasons why the low-frequency magnetic shielding effectiveness (SE) is different when characterized using two parallel loops (NSA 94-106) or two coplanar loops (IEEE Std. 299). It shows how the change in the loop radius impacts the SE for the NSA 94–106 setup rather than for the IEEE 299 one. The observation is rooted in the difference of the wave impedance for both scenarios. Additionally, this letter elucidates the reason behind the wave impedance difference.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
NSA 94-106 和 IEEE Std:数值模拟研究
这封信利用仿真结果来说明,在使用两个平行环路(NSA 94-106)或两个共面环路(IEEE 标准 299)时,低频磁屏蔽效能(SE)不同的实际原因。它显示了环路半径的变化如何影响 NSA 94-106 设置的 SE,而不是 IEEE 299 设置的 SE。这一观察结果源于两种情况下波阻抗的不同。此外,这封信还阐明了波阻抗差异背后的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
2025 Index IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatiblity Practice and Applications Table of Contents Front Cover Editorial: Message From the Editor-in-Chief IEEE ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY SOCIETY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1