Taxi in competition with online car-hailing drivers: Policy implication to operating strategies

Tianqi Gu , Weiping Xu , Peijie Shi , Ruiyi Wang , Inhi Kim
{"title":"Taxi in competition with online car-hailing drivers: Policy implication to operating strategies","authors":"Tianqi Gu ,&nbsp;Weiping Xu ,&nbsp;Peijie Shi ,&nbsp;Ruiyi Wang ,&nbsp;Inhi Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.multra.2024.100129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Car-hailing and taxis coexist and constitute a healthy market in normal times when demand is sufficient for growing supplies. However, in a limited market influenced by disruptive issues such as COVID-19, drivers from online car-hailing and local taxi operators have been compelled to engage in competition due to the shrinking revenue. The distinct occupational characteristics and operation patterns of drivers in different groups directly influence their operational strategies (whether to operate or not), which remains an unexplored research area. To this end, this article analyzes the contrast in diverse operating indicators between the two service models before and following the outbreak of the epidemic based on a local case study in Suzhou. It establishes an income matrix for drivers in varied scenarios and employs evolutionary game theory (EGT) to dissect the dynamic operating strategies of taxi and online car-hailing drivers. Furthermore, considering the impact of disruptive issues on market demand, this study also introduces an optimized dynamic income incentive mechanism. The findings demonstrate that when disruptive issues arise and last for a considerable extended period, a 'winner-takes-all' market scenario might unfold - the potential monopoly of one service type. To circumvent this scenario, proactive human intervention can be employed at opportune moments, such as augmenting initial income, to establish the equilibrium state of ESS (1,1)—a balanced and robust coexistence of the two services. Overall, this paper provides a set of novel indicators to identify different drivers’ operation strategies, and applies EGT to analyze and estimate their operation strategies during disruptive events.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100933,"journal":{"name":"Multimodal Transportation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772586324000108/pdfft?md5=d63c5fb6278bbb62b160a2166075448a&pid=1-s2.0-S2772586324000108-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multimodal Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772586324000108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Car-hailing and taxis coexist and constitute a healthy market in normal times when demand is sufficient for growing supplies. However, in a limited market influenced by disruptive issues such as COVID-19, drivers from online car-hailing and local taxi operators have been compelled to engage in competition due to the shrinking revenue. The distinct occupational characteristics and operation patterns of drivers in different groups directly influence their operational strategies (whether to operate or not), which remains an unexplored research area. To this end, this article analyzes the contrast in diverse operating indicators between the two service models before and following the outbreak of the epidemic based on a local case study in Suzhou. It establishes an income matrix for drivers in varied scenarios and employs evolutionary game theory (EGT) to dissect the dynamic operating strategies of taxi and online car-hailing drivers. Furthermore, considering the impact of disruptive issues on market demand, this study also introduces an optimized dynamic income incentive mechanism. The findings demonstrate that when disruptive issues arise and last for a considerable extended period, a 'winner-takes-all' market scenario might unfold - the potential monopoly of one service type. To circumvent this scenario, proactive human intervention can be employed at opportune moments, such as augmenting initial income, to establish the equilibrium state of ESS (1,1)—a balanced and robust coexistence of the two services. Overall, this paper provides a set of novel indicators to identify different drivers’ operation strategies, and applies EGT to analyze and estimate their operation strategies during disruptive events.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
出租车与网约车司机的竞争:对运营战略的政策影响
在正常情况下,当需求足以满足不断增长的供给时,汽车召车和出租车共存并构成一个健康的市场。然而,在受 COVID-19 等颠覆性问题影响的有限市场中,网约车和本地出租车运营商的司机因收入缩水而不得不参与竞争。不同群体司机的不同职业特征和运营模式直接影响着他们的运营策略(是否运营),这仍是一个尚未探索的研究领域。为此,本文以苏州本地案例为基础,分析了疫情爆发前后两种服务模式在不同运营指标上的对比。文章建立了不同场景下司机的收入矩阵,并运用演化博弈论(EGT)剖析了出租车和网约车司机的动态运营策略。此外,考虑到颠覆性问题对市场需求的影响,本研究还引入了优化的动态收入激励机制。研究结果表明,当颠覆性问题出现并持续相当长一段时间后,市场可能会出现 "赢家通吃 "的局面--一种服务类型可能会被垄断。为避免出现这种情况,可以在适当的时候采取积极的人为干预措施,例如增加初始收入,以建立ESS(1,1)的均衡状态--两种服务均衡而稳健地共存。总之,本文提供了一套新颖的指标来识别不同司机的运营策略,并应用 EGT 分析和估计他们在破坏性事件中的运营策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Relationship between urban traffic crashes and temporal/meteorological conditions: understanding and predicting the effects An assignment-based decomposition approach for the vehicle routing problem with backhauls An adapted savings algorithm for planning heterogeneous logistics with uncrewed aerial vehicles Catastrophic causes of truck drivers’ crashes on Brazilian highways: Mixed method analyses and crash prediction using machine learning Reinforcement learning in transportation research: Frontiers and future directions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1